Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: April Metagame Analysis

  1. #1
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    April Metagame Analysis

    Hey everyone,

    We're two weeks into May so I'm hoping the bulk of April's results are in. I went with the same formula of surveying all decks on The Council with 6 or more rounds of players, the tournaments (some of these will date to the end of March but their results came in quite late) are:

    SCG Milwaukee (376 players)
    SCG Dallas (308 players)
    SCG Detroit (225 players)
    Trial BoM 9 ( 35 players)
    3 Toreno Legacy (33 players)
    Kingdom Galactus 7 (40 players)
    Prague Eternal Trial (47 players)
    Evil 10 (205 players)
    Hymn to Wave Legacy (96 players)
    BoMbs 3.0 (62 players)
    LCL April (94 players)
    Arcanis 20k (203 players)
    Liga Valenciana Torneo 8 (38 players)
    WL6 Vado (33 players)
    AZMagic April (34 players)
    GBLL Tapa 8 (46 players)
    Knight Ware April (66 players)
    Legacy Linz 2014 (38 players)
    Scandicci April (39 players)
    BoM 9 (535 players)
    Hannover (79 players)
    2 Torneo Legacy (39 players)
    3 LCL Store Evolution (55 players)

    This covered 181 decks (one or two tournaments did not report a full top 8) and the decks with the most top 8s over this period are:

    Miracles 27 top 8s
    Team America 19 top 8s
    Death n Taxes 10 top 8s
    ANT 9 top 8s
    Deathblade 9 top 8s
    Jund, RUG, and UWR Delver 8 top 8s
    Sneak and Show, Fish, and UR Delver 7 top 8s
    Shardless BUG 6 top 8s
    Elves, Esper Stoneblade, and PW BUG 5 top 8s
    Maverick, Painter, and Dredge 4 top 8s

    35 decks total appeared in a top 8 over this period as well.

    If you want I can also give the results of the TNN-forward meta, but so far no deck has more than 9.17% of top 8 placings since TNN became legal and the top 12 decks are 65.32% of all decks placing from November through April.

  2. #2
    Member
    BVB09's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2011
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    157

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Thanks for the analysis, very useful! But one question, with "Fish" you mean Merfolks or UWx Aggro?
    Is interesting how Esperblade passed from DTB to that position...

  3. #3
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Merfolks, I think that's what they use in Europe but I've always used them interchangeably here in the States.

  4. #4
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    It is interesting to me that none of the PLS events nor Michael Caffrey's events are on the council :(. Oh well, this analysis is still awesome. Thanks!
    Matt Bevenour in real life

  5. #5
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by HSCK View Post
    If you want I can also give the results of the TNN-forward meta...
    That would be awesome if you have the time!

  6. #6

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    This month's data is a bit different.

    BoM staff was kind enough to sort out all 535 deck lists into different archtypes, so you get to see how well each archtype performed in the swiss. That's something SCG could have done but lacks resources.

  7. #7
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Sure, this is just the crunched version of the criteria I've been using:

    November: 248 decks
    December and January: 364 decks
    February: 104
    March: 193
    April: 181

    Total of 1090 decks surveyed

    Team America and Miracles: 100 top 8s
    UWR and Deathblade: 57 top 8s
    Sneak n Show and RUG: 56 top 8s
    Jund: 52 top 8s
    Elves: 51 top 8s
    Blade Control: 50 top 8s
    Death n Taxes and ANT: 48 top 8s
    Shardless BUG: 37 top 8s

    Total: 65.32% of the metagame. I think that's the lowest percentage in terms of consolidation for the top tier decks in a long time for Legacy, maybe ever. That's 12 decks! Pre-TNN these same 12 decks took up close 85% if I recall, but Arsenal has those numbers.

  8. #8
    Site Contributor
    Scott's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Virginia
    Posts

    659

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by Tammit67 View Post
    It is interesting to me that none of the PLS events nor Michael Caffrey's events are on the council :(. Oh well, this analysis is still awesome. Thanks!
    I don't really know how it works, but if you know anyone who has the deck lists, there's a submission page: http://tcdecks.net/submit.php

  9. #9
    Member
    GoblinZ's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Beijing/Shenzhen
    Posts

    370

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by Scott View Post
    I don't really know how it works, but if you know anyone who has the deck lists, there's a submission page: http://tcdecks.net/submit.php
    By the way, I sent some decklists about one week ago, but it seems that the deck lists are not published yet...And I also sent message to them, but there is no reply...Do you know how I can contact them? Thanks...
    Team Blood, Beijing.
    Currently play: Sneaky Show/ Lands

  10. #10
    Judgy Curmudgeon
    Ellomdian's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    409

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    In B4 whining about sample size and teh udder dominance of TNN and Brainstorm LOLZ!

    Seriously though, this data is great - it's nice to be able to have some balance to "Common knowledge" (ie, SCG=Legacy)

    Keep it up! +1 internet dollars!

    EDIT: While the Archetype groupings are great, I don't see the logic of grouping America and Miracles, let alone RUG and Sneak'n'Show. Thoughts?
    Check out my Legacy UBTezz Primer. Chalice of the Void: Keeping Magic Fair.
    -----
    Playing since '96. Brief forced break '02-04. Former/Idle Judge since '05. Told Smmenen to play faster at Vintage Worlds.
    -----
    Most of the 'Ban brainstorm!' arguments are based on the logic that 'more different cards should get played in Legacy', as though the success or health of the format can be measured by the portion of cards that are available and see play. This is an idiotic metric.

  11. #11
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    They're grouped by frequency, not archetype? So those two go together because they each have the same amount of top 8s.
    Last edited by HSCK; 05-15-2014 at 10:09 PM.

  12. #12

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    ^I'm pretty sure that's just saying EACH had a 100 top 8's. Not combined they had that many.

  13. #13
    Judgy Curmudgeon
    Ellomdian's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    409

    Re: April Metagame Analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by [SLAYER]chaos View Post
    ^I'm pretty sure that's just saying EACH had a 100 top 8's. Not combined they had that many.
    Aha! That makes way more sense :)
    Check out my Legacy UBTezz Primer. Chalice of the Void: Keeping Magic Fair.
    -----
    Playing since '96. Brief forced break '02-04. Former/Idle Judge since '05. Told Smmenen to play faster at Vintage Worlds.
    -----
    Most of the 'Ban brainstorm!' arguments are based on the logic that 'more different cards should get played in Legacy', as though the success or health of the format can be measured by the portion of cards that are available and see play. This is an idiotic metric.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)