Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Gideon and "must attack X" cards

  1. #1
    Here I Rule!!!!!!!!!!
    Phoenix Ignition's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Location

    Minneapolis MN
    Posts

    2,287

    Gideon and "must attack X" cards

    I was playing MTGO and am wondering if this is in the rules or just a bug.

    The opponent played Gideon Jura and used the +2 ability. I had a Geist of Saint Traft in play and therefore attacked Gideon with it the next turn, but it gave me the option to use the 4/4 angel token to attack Gideon or to directly attack the player if I chose. What rules knowledge should I know for this interaction? Without going into specific rules I would have just assumed the angel must attack Gideon.

    MTGO is known for bugs involving their rules interactions, however.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,496

    Re: Gideon and "must attack X" cards

    It's fine since Geist attacks due to Gideon's trigger. The token is created afterwards already attacking, so it isn't affected by Gideon anymore.

  3. #3

    Re: Gideon and "must attack X" cards

    Gideon's ability is a requirement on declaring attackers (508.1d). There's two concepts called restrictions and requirements, and they only apply to declaring attackers and blockers. Since the angel is put on the battlefield attacking, it isn't involved in declare attackers and doesn't care about restrictions or requirments.
    “It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.
    -David DeLaney

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)