Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

  1. #21

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    Quote Originally Posted by nodahero View Post
    Can anyone post the UG Dark Depths build or even a link to it?
    Is there a UG Dark Depths build? The Dark Depths builds I've seen are mono-Green, like this one.

  2. #22
    Clergyman of Cool
    lordofthepit's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Location

    Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
    Posts

    1,954

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    I agree they look like shit.

    My inspiration for considering snow-covered basics came from watching a stream in which an opponent went green fetchland into Snow-Covered Forest. The streamer put him on Elves or Maverick, but the fact that it's Snow-Covered was a dead giveaway to me that the opponent was on Turbo Post.

    I'm wondering if I shouldn't be swapping the Forests in my Elves deck for Snow-Covered Forests at least, since this seems like the only basic land type where you could credibly represent another archetype. If only they looked like Beta forests.

  3. #23
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    Quote Originally Posted by lordofthepit View Post
    I agree they look like shit.

    My inspiration for considering snow-covered basics came from watching a stream in which an opponent went green fetchland into Snow-Covered Forest. The streamer put him on Elves or Maverick, but the fact that it's Snow-Covered was a dead giveaway to me that the opponent was on Turbo Post.

    I'm wondering if I shouldn't be swapping the Forests in my Elves deck for Snow-Covered Forests at least, since this seems like the only basic land type where you could credibly represent another archetype. If only they looked like Beta forests.
    To be fair, with elves, how often are you playing a turn 1 forest and not casting something that is basically a dead giveaway to what you are playing?
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  4. #24
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    To be fair, with elves, how often are you playing a turn 1 forest and not casting something that is basically a dead giveaway to what you are playing?
    As much as it pains me to admit similarities, they can share Green Sun's Zenith. Fortunately, that's where the similarities end.

  5. #25
    Force of Will is my bitch
    Finn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2004
    Location

    South Florida
    Posts

    2,979

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    I admit ignorance to Anchorman references. That movie did not do it for me. I'm lucky I did not choose to make fun of your statement.
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
    "Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason."
    "Governing is too important to be left to people as silly as politicians."
    "Politicians were mostly people who'd had too little morals and ethics to stay lawyers."

  6. #26
    Hamburglar Hlelpler
    TsumiBand's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Nebraska
    Posts

    2,774

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    I admit ignorance to Anchorman references. That movie did not do it for me. I'm lucky I did not choose to make fun of your statement.
    I eschew every movie centered around Will Farrell, with the exception of Stranger Than Fiction. Yeah, I'm "that guy", IDGAF. vOv

    I'm not entirely positive that Into the North's synergy with one tutorable card means that all of Snow lands are worth a look - it's akin in my mind to suggesting Stoneforge Mystic makes Bonesplitter a better card. It's a two-way street; if there had never been any "Sword of Bill and Ted" cycle or if Batterskull had been conceived a little differently, we might not be playing SFM at all, but we have those cards and so the limited tutor aspect of SFM makes it a worthwhile card. Into the North gets Dark Depths, sweet -- but it's pretty hard to argue for a ton of other snow cards, for the sake of playing moar Snow.

    I still maintain that Scrying Sheets being the one other playable Snow land and not seeing play is indicative of this trend in Snow cards. Shit mang, it says "2, T: Draw a card" on it. Tempo and control decks should have been snowing the fuck out of their mana bases if that effect were worthwhile, but it didn't really happen because the rest of the Snow cards aren't strong enough to keep the success rate closer to 1.

    I'd be all about seeing more Snow or other rando elementally-supertyped cards, but "dicking with types" seem to be another way of spelling "DOA" for any given mechanic (Arcane, Tribal... :/) so maybe it's better left on the shelf -- but if they did ever return to a Snowy plane and maybe raise the playability of Snow things, this would be a more interesting discussion. As it stands there's only one-offs to playing Snow stuff beyond a handful of spells that it's not even a pro or a con really, just a "why bother".
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Creature type - 'Fuck you mooooooom'
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    EDIT: Tsumi, you are silly.

  7. #27
    banned

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    black metal bed room
    Posts

    2,188

    Re: Should we be playing snow-covered basics?

    IDK how I could throw them into RUG Thresh without being ridiculous.

    Otoh, when I was building some casual pile a month or two ago, I thought about the GW snowlands. Yet they don't work well in ICE-WTH environment, because something something Jamuraa. So I sticked to normal ICE lands (as Mirage bushes are awful), thus having a manabase made completely of Allice:

    10 Forest
    5 Plains
    4 Brushland
    3 Thawing Glaciers

    4 Fyndhorn Elves
    4 Quirion Ranger
    2 Wall of Roots
    4 River Boa
    4 Jolrael's Centaur
    4 Maro
    4 Serrated Biskelion

    2 Sylvan Library
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    3 Armageddon
    2 Reprisal
    1 Disenchant


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)