Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 61 to 64 of 64

Thread: GP NJ meta discussion

  1. #61
    Cabal Therapist
    TheArchitect's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Colchester, VT
    Posts

    600

    Re: GP NJ meta discussion

    By the way, the day 2 metagame break down is up, which is like the best paper statistics we ever get:

    http://magic.wizards.com/en/events/c.../gpnj14/d2meta

    and round 14 breakdown:

    http://magic.wizards.com/en/events/c...gpnj14/r14meta

    The naming conventions are a little annoying. Like Eli's deck is apparently "grixis tempo", UR Golddigger is UR (not izzet?) control and Nic Fit is Jund Midrange (which is different from actual jund midrange).

  2. #62
    Judgy Curmudgeon
    Ellomdian's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    409

    Re: GP NJ meta discussion

    Let's sum this up:

    UR Delver is expected to make up 30-35% of the field Day 1, only made up 20% of the field Day 2, and finished with just over 10% of the T8 with a single list.

    Whereas Miracles made up 6% of the D2 field, and 25% of the T8.

    TL;DR - UR Delver under-performed dramatically, especially for all of the "Best Deck" hype it got in the last 2 weeks.

    EDIT: It gets even better - there is a SINGLE UR Delver list in the T16. Or, 6%.
    Check out my Legacy UBTezz Primer. Chalice of the Void: Keeping Magic Fair.
    -----
    Playing since '96. Brief forced break '02-04. Former/Idle Judge since '05. Told Smmenen to play faster at Vintage Worlds.
    -----
    Most of the 'Ban brainstorm!' arguments are based on the logic that 'more different cards should get played in Legacy', as though the success or health of the format can be measured by the portion of cards that are available and see play. This is an idiotic metric.

  3. #63
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: GP NJ meta discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by tammit67
    Doesn't stop people for Hymn to Touraching me out of the event, or bringing in pithing needle for LED..
    Quote Originally Posted by rlesko View Post
    umm...
    I never said my opponent knew how his cards interacted with mine, just that discard was a poor choice that feels like it works.
    Matt Bevenour in real life

  4. #64
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,496

    Re: GP NJ meta discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Ellomdian View Post
    Let's sum this up:

    UR Delver is expected to make up 30-35% of the field Day 1, only made up 20% of the field Day 2, and finished with just over 10% of the T8 with a single list.

    Whereas Miracles made up 6% of the D2 field, and 25% of the T8.

    TL;DR - UR Delver under-performed dramatically, especially for all of the "Best Deck" hype it got in the last 2 weeks.

    EDIT: It gets even better - there is a SINGLE UR Delver list in the T16. Or, 6%.
    UR Delver is a retard-proof budget deck that requires little format knowledge. It underperforming isn't too suprising in the grand scheme of things. People came prepared for it.

    Miracles is a hard-to-play deck that rewards skill alot, so people bringing it are most likely pretty good with the deck. It performing above average yields no real suprises, either.

    True performers were basically Jeskai Stoneblade and Miracles, while UWR Delver, Elves and Sneak and Show had a good showing, too. D&T performed average compared to its starting numbers and UR Delver sucked badly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)