The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
1. Discuss the unbanning ofLand TaxEarthcraft.
2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
4. Stifle Standstill.
5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).
This isn't an argument about renaming because Wizards never gave them any real names. The only names they had were things made by the communitee like abbreviations of colors, or just naming the 3 colors like "Blue/White/Red". So considering the fact that they weren't actually named I would be hard pressed to say this is a problem with renaming. I also am not advocating changing them constantly, as that just gets confusing, but I don't see the problem of them giving them universal names akin to what they did with shards of alara.
The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
1. Discuss the unbanning ofLand TaxEarthcraft.
2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
4. Stifle Standstill.
5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).
West side
Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
* Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
My Legacy stream
My MTG Blog - Work in progress
The only name of those that people ever used for those is Dega, so considering that absolutely no one ever used the (hyperbole, but not far from the truth) I think its safe to say they are irrelevant.
I only watch legacy and Modern GPs and don't watch Pro tours at all so I don't know what Wizards does and doesn't name things. I did watch the Modern portion of PT Fate Reforged and GP Vancouver and they named the Junk decks Abzan. I also watched GP Omaha and it was the same, they also called the UWR decks Jeskai.
Almost every time I saw a man use the name "Dega" on forums, their topic is not focus on tactics/card selection of some BWR deck, but on boasting their MTG experience since(before) Apocalypse.
Personally I don't like the Khans names, these name are harder to spell than 2-syllables "Bant" or "Junk". But at least "Mardu" does not contain cheap sense of pride.
I hear they got twisters miles wide in the Midwest.
Hello,
this is you personal opinion. I think you are not a new player and therefore these names are not for you. That means you are not theiamajellydonut
Because "Sultai Delver" is no more descriptive than saying "BUG Delver" and it sounds like ass.
target group. In addtion to that your personal liking of the name is not a reason for making the introduction of new people more diffcult than
necassary.
So again please tell me why it is worse to name something Sultai instead of UWR, or Outjai+r or Azorius +R. All names are describing the same deck
and therefore you can take what you want in your discussion.
SCG has to insure that every person undertsand their articles and therefore i bound to chose the newest name because otherwise people who started with
Khans might be unable to understand the articles because they donīt know terms like BUG Delver.
The first part of this comment is ignorant on so many levels and can be compared with the famous #goplay modern. MTG changes and at the momentBarook
If one can't grasp something easy like the WUBRG color code, then MtG is most likely the wrong game for them.
Besides, what happens once Wedges rotate out of Standard? How is a new player after that going to know what the hell Mardu means?
they want to introduce the game to as much people as possible and the result are names which are easier to rember than a abstract combination of
letters like RBG or UWR. So yes they names they use now are unfamiliar for the most older players but no one forces you to use it.
So why exactly are you flaming about other people having their own opinion on that and using such names out of pratical reasons ?
I mean there was no valid argument here but only subjective feelings or unjustified insults like your sentance above.
What happens when Wedges rotate out is easy all Colour combination from them will continously explained with the last known name so UWR will stay Sultai as
long as there is no new set of names.
In the end Names are names and while true names matter, normal names are quiet easy exchangable as long as they describe the same fact and this is clearly the case.
Hello,
If this is really the case than they should rethink the name. I for mypart canīt believe that some one can get the names wrongBecause the names are so atrocious that even their proponents can't get them right.
but this is a legit argument against the names.
Hello,
Donīt know what you are taling about. I for my part only agreed to the fact that if the people who are using the names canīt use them in the right way thanYou are the best!
Thank you for making this day a little bit brighter!
the names should be changed.
I read it so it would say if people who are supporting the names canīt use them right change it and not as he maybe intended that
the even the supporters of the names can make them as good as needed to acept them because they are bad.
So what I did was to assume that he wanted to bring a valid argument and not another subjective opnion without any agrument
to make a discussion possible.
My mother was a huge fan of Frank Sinatra, and she said one of the things she always liked about his shows was that, before a song, he'd make a point of telling the audience who wrote it and who arranged it, and would be sure the audience knew who was in the band, etc.
So after getting that hammered into me, I try to make sure, when I'm playing some piece of tech and know who came up with it, to make sure I give credit to the person who invented it. Seems like the thing to do.
I feel like the only thoughts that went into the Khans names were "I guess we need names for these colors" and "How exotic can we make them?" They clearly cared more about making the names sound as fake-Asian as possible than the names feeling like they mean anything. Granted, most of the Shards names don't mean anything either, but when I hear Grixis it actually makes me think of Black, and Esper makes me think of things that actually match what Esper is supposed to be. Even if I'm just full of shit because I just got used to the names, at least those names are simple and feel like they could mean something in English. The Khans names aren't memorable except for how they *almost* sound like words, and the only reason anyone mentally connects Sultai or any of the clan names with anything color related is because Wizards is forcing it down your throat for breakfast lunch and dinner.
We still use the names from a block from 2008, even new players use those.
Then continue ignoring them, that's fine, but the difference is that I never heard any complaints like "those names are atrocious, how dare wizards even try to feed us this garbage".
You seem like a nice guy, but it's hard to discuss this with you when you don't follow established conventions of logic.
Step 1: You defend the names
Step 2: I ask you whether that means we'll be switching names every couple of years
Step 3: You say we didn't really do that so there's no evidence supporting my assumption
Step 4: We point out to you how we actually did go through several iterations of color combination namings
Step 5: You say you watched coverage since the introduction of the names and WotC used those new names.
You can see how I am lost about what to respond when your comment doesn't address what we responded with in Step 4.
The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
1. Discuss the unbanning ofLand TaxEarthcraft.
2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
4. Stifle Standstill.
5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)