Conspiracy: Take the Crown

[Begle1]

The (re)printing of Inquisition, S&T, Wish, Recruiters, Prelate and other Legacy relevant cards just sparked some hope. Its shattering to see Avatar of Woe side by side with Sanctum Prelute as the respective colors Mythic slot

Avatar of Woe is way better than Sanctum Prelate in multiplayer limited though. I'm going to feel like such a card whore when I first pick Prelate...

[Sidneyious]

Kiln fiend reprint!

Praise be!

Why

[Lemnear]

Kiln fiend reprint!

Praise be!

[LMental]

Hi all,

Longtime reader, infrequent poster, but I made a little write-up about my expectations for Conspiracy, especially as concerns Death & Taxes. Would love to know what you all think!

https://fetchlandformats.wordpress.c...now-be-tier-1/

Best,
Ian

[Lemnear]

Hi all,

Longtime reader, infrequent poster, but I made a little write-up about my expectations for Conspiracy, especially as concerns Death & Taxes. Would love to know what you all think!

I think you copy & pasted this thread. Lol

[LMental]

I think you copy & pasted this thread. Lol

Well, I definitely read this thread.

In fact, as I said over on the Death & Taxes thread where I also shared this link, "Nothing revolutionary or too different from what I've seen here, but perhaps an accurate summation of what people have been saying?"

[Lemnear]

Well, I definitely read this thread.

In fact, as I said over on the Death & Taxes thread where I also shared this link, "Nothing revolutionary or too different from what I've seen here, but perhaps an accurate summation of what people have been saying?"

I just don't think the "my expectation" and similar strokes of "I have concluded" in that article is fitting if you staight up rippoff everything said on TheSource without giving credits but keep dropping "I think this is the set that finally removes the subpar Serra Avenger from D&T once and for all" and similar stuff instead, despite the ideas and arguments being made by other people. Just my 0.02$

[LMental]

I just don't think the "my expectation" and similar strokes of "I have concluded" in that article is fitting if you staight up rippoff everything said on TheSource without giving credits but keep dropping "I think this is the set that finally removes the subpar Serra Avenger from D&T once and for all" and similar stuff instead, despite the ideas and arguments being made by other people. Just my 0.02$

Oh come on, it doesn't take a genius to figure that stuff out—that this will push Serra Avenger out of D&T is totally my original thought, and if you came to the same conclusion, great. You'll note especially that I do not blindly agree with everything said here—for instance I argue against Chrome Mox in D&T, against cutting a Thalia, GoT, against including more than 2 (max) Prelates, for testing out Palace Guard in a serious manner, etc.

Look, you guys are smart. I've been a source reader in various forms for over ten years (my old account is "Mental" from when I was a kid; I lost the password and associated email address years back). I learn a lot from the Source. But what do you want from me? To credit the first poster in this thread who said Recruiter of the Guard would be good in D&T? That Sanctum Prelate would be good in D&T? Really?

[Mr Miagi]

Take it easy Lem, content of lots of articles has same or similar content asthe Source forums so.. you know, take it easy. Every legacy contribution is great!

[Hopo]

Oh come on, it doesn't take a genius to figure that stuff out—that this will push Serra Avenger out of D&T is totally my original thought, and if you came to the same conclusion, great. You'll note especially that I do not blindly agree with everything said here—for instance I argue against Chrome Mox in D&T, against cutting a Thalia, GoT, against including more than 2 (max) Prelates, for testing out Palace Guard in a serious manner, etc.

Look, you guys are smart. I've been a source reader in various forms for over ten years (my old account is "Mental" from when I was a kid; I lost the password and associated email address years back). I learn a lot from the Source. But what do you want from me? To credit the first poster in this thread who said Recruiter of the Guard would be good in D&T? That Sanctum Prelate would be good in D&T? Really?

Never mind him. Many times he just doesn't seem to think things through before posting. Like you said, it doesn't take a genius to figure these pretty basic things out.

[Lemnear]

Take it easy Lem, content of lots of articles has same or similar content asthe Source forums so.. you know, take it easy. Every legacy contribution is great!

"Contribution" is the magic word. I miss that one.

Edit:

Never mind him. Many times he just doesn't seem to think things through before posting. Like you said, it doesn't take a genius to figure these pretty basic things out.

It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Prelate will see play IN MIRACLES to fight combo & control (blocking Loam & P.Fire for example) and will free slots in Miracles to fight D&T.

[LMental]

"Contribution" is the magic word. I miss that one.

Not everyone is as well versed in Legacy as people on the Source, and not everyone on the Source is as well versed in Legacy as you. So, there's that as a contribution. Plus, I hoped that by organising my thoughts about Conspiracy 2 in one place, it might provoke some more discussion as to what the optimal D&T list is—a discussion that's already going on, obviously, but about which I have my own viewpoints which are pointedly not exactly the same as everyone else's, in fact. Also, it lets me look back on the post at a later date and see how I did in analysing. Also, I don't just talk about D&T—I do spend some time discussing other cards. The post was not originally intended to be all about D&T; it just sort of happened when I started writing it.

Not every contribution is going to be a new archetype and I honestly think working to fine-tune a deck is an extremely important contribution. So if you have some issues with the list I proposed, and reasons for those issues, I'd be interested in hearing them, seriously.

[Lemnear]

I was free to elaborate myself via PM. Cheers :)

[Gollus]

And we have our first sorcery with toughness :O

[Mr Miagi]

And we have our first sorcery with toughness :O

So.... can you bolt it on the stack to fizzle it?

[Lemnear]

And we have our first sorcery with toughness :O

Dafuq is that?

[Barook]

Obviously, they're a fan of the Spy Kit + Arc-Slogger + Volative Chimera combo.

Seriously, what the hell was QA doing with this set? First the Monarch token, now this.

[TsumiBand]

That's pretty major errata, considering this was first printed in Zendikar Block.

[Aggro_zombies]

Can't wait to Garbage Fire my opponent's Windborne Charge. It seems appropriate.

[HdH_Cthulhu]

That looks like a mtgcardsmith card. First I was like what where is the trigger? Now i cant even...