I'd also not mix up online and paper data... different card availability and deck choice flexibility as well as nonstop online grinding which is impossible in paper make it too unrelated to me, also mtggoldfish does cover the online metagame reasonably well so why not stick to paper only
Really? hahaha, incredible... time to time I'm tempeted to buy into modo and then I actually sober up..
I was thinking less about player skill and more about league structure. You can win 5 matches against players with losing records in a league, whereas at any real tournament you'll generally only be 5-0 by beating a series of undefeated people. So 'I went 5-0' in a league means less. Data from dailies would have been better, because they were structured like real tournaments.
Where did you read that? I was just going by what they said in the treasure chest article, "later this year". It would be great if we had a date for them.
I apologise that my brain shortcutted 1-3 months to a "few" months, you are a champion of truth and justice Barook ^-^
Junk and Stoned Rhinos.
how often do we expect the lag to happen in the future?
1. a new card in a new non-stanrdard product makes impact in legacy
2. mtgo won't update for some time
They are 2 different Legacy formats then. Why perform aggregation when they are not the same? If this is happening now, it's possible this will keep happening.
I keep my own tracking and it's definitely better to keep them separate. Price differences for Port lead to less D&T and more Dark Depths combo. The two metagames are simply different, no need to combine the two.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)