Itīs Great
itīs okay
Not really
Funny thing is that would probably still be a fine sideboard.
@zombie blue was to counter swiftspear young pyro bolts pyroblast etc, which turned out to be more important than countering the blue stuff.
It's also fair to say that such overpowered cards are able to shake the format a litle bit, bringing some old forgotten decks back to a decent status.
I remember playing freacking Solidarity again thanks to DTT, it probably was the most fun I had with legacy in the last 6 years
"You either die a Onesto-Player, or live long enough to see yourself become a Dredger"
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
Was far too appeling to just post a rant + picture rather than trying to understand the point made, which is the desperation present across the community that people not only splash colors to run certain cards without alternative equivalents, but run MD cards messing with their own deck.
Of course we have long crossed the line where combo players should just switch to "interactive" games with Emrakul rather than durdling with chaining spells to restore the old balance between Aggro & Combo, because these days its obviously more "interactive" to see Emrakul facing Chalice + Worldbreaker or Counterbalance + Plowshares than Storm vs Tempo
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
If Chalice and Counterbalance are banned you also have to ban Brainstorm otherwise the cantrip cartel has full reign again.
Seriously I don't get this. It's only because Eldrazi that some people are suddenly irritated with Chalice. When it was only MUD and Loam playing Chalice it was not a problem. Btw, I still think that Loam is a much much stronger deck than Eldrazi will ever be, it's just a lot harder to play than turning some spaghetti creatures sideways, so people never realy picked that chalice deck up.
What I think is the biggest problem is net-decking and a lack of coverage. It sounds ridiculous and unintuitive but because of a lack of coverage since we have lost the scg legacy opens, people just don't see interesting brews and possible new archetypes popping up on streams. Comming up with a new archetype is fricking insane that only a few realy good players can pull off. But even than, I think that at this moment there are more viable strategies than in the last 2-3 years of legacy which were fully dominated by blue xerox type decks. At least you don't have to play blue these days to have a winning chance, if that means you need to start your deck building with 4 decays or 4 chalices, fine! It's not much different than bunch of islands, 4 brainstorms, 4 ponders, 4 forces (and 4 decays...)
First of all, no one wants to see counterbalance or Chalice banned, because they are tools to keep combo in check. What do you mean by "only because Eldrazi"? Forgot that Chalice got stupid good when they printed Lodestone which put MUD over the top for years?
P.S.:
Its kinda pathetic that people were moaning the "lacking format diversity" as every blue deck ran Ponder/Brainstorm/Probe in a dozen different decks and colors, but now as near every deck is blue deck is BUGx and starts with 4 Ponder, 4 Brainstorm, 4 Decay, some players praise the "diversity"? What diversity? Because D&T and colorless aggro now have a bigger metagame share? Seriously, has this new meta emerged even a new deck supertypes (mind that Eldrazi simply is the successor of the MUD aggro variants) or just killed some?
Honestly, all what is requested is some non-BUG options to create diversity in battling Countertop/Chalice instead of sidestepping it with a few fringe deck options
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
as I'm one of the these people I feel I need to say:
A, I don't see CB or CotV as a problem (for Storm or for legacy), in fact I "like" these cards, CotV is alright as long as it stays where it belongs - in terrible inconsistent decks for people who like to gamble and go against the grain... a minor funpolice to spice things up... CB, I remember when CB was a game over, it's not that long ago, I was fine with back then why would I complain now?
B, MD AD isn't a reaction to CB or CotV, both are way beyond their peak (it seems to me) but because of Leovold or better said with Leovold the threshold where MD AD is a consideration is met for me as almost every deck has a potential "backbreaking" T2 play which makes the overall XP very random, especially since UBG colors can find and defend the Leovold, are widely popular and unpredictable on whether they run it or not
there are different, less flashy, forms of adjustment in inner-deck ratios and card selection which certainly happened long ago, to MD answers wasn't (and very likely still isn't) worth it
C, I was about to express my opinion on netdecking and deckchoices but then noticed B/R thread isn't active for 2 weeks so I'll save the rant for later
then you're doing something wrong...
actually the skill cap of the game is slowly becoming the only reason I play it, I don't consider it much fun anymore but as long as it stays a challenge I tolerate myself this extravagance
Mostly because the BnR rant moved to this thread essentially. Just with less specific choices of cards and more broad in terms of strategies in general and how legacy has become dull to many.
"I'm willing to imagine a TES where Past in Flames replaces Ill-Gotten Gains entirely, and we just don't play Diminishing Returns." - me, 29/09/2011
Founding member of Team Scrubbad: Legacy Legends
The problem being you need it to be RR or the blue decks simply play it in their deck because everything is inevitably better when casting brainstorm alongside it. Of course, then you're playing a RR spell in legacy and that means it's really hard to fit brainstorm in your deck, so despite the powerlevel of the RR card, you're just better off cantripping.
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
The format is diverse - you just have to look at entire decks rather than focusing on a small set of cards.
Do you think Eldrazi, Lands, and Aggro Loam are not very different decks because the all run CotV in the 75?
Do you think Elves, Pyro, Shardless, Loam, and Infect are basically the same because they all run AD or Grip?
Do you think Reanimator, D&T, Burn, and Miracles "don't really count" in terms of format diversity?
If you can't see the diversity, maybe the problem is not with the format.
What do you consider to be a "deck supertype"? I'm thinking:
- Aggro
- Tempo
- Midrange (anywhere from aggressove to grindy)
- Stompy
- Combo
- Control
- Prison
I don't think MTG has seen a new "supertype" since pretty much forever. If anything we get new hybrids - eg, I dont think aggro/prison was a thing before D&T.
That said, the current meta boasts a fantastic spread of these play-styles! When was the last time
Legacy was this rich with varying play-styles?
So... D&T, Infect, and RB Reanimator are now fringe decks? Why? Please justify your claim that three out of six DTBs are now "fringe decks". I guess this is the age of "alternative facts", but this is so blatantly false I'm almost surprised that you even posted it.
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
I already have one link to our local stream in this thread, but since I keep seeing this same sentiment repeated, I'm going to post it again:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/118607411
This week's matches:
Round 1: Bomberman vs. Jund
Round 2: Dark Bant vs. MUD
Round 2 (backup match): ANT vs. UWR Blade Landstill
Round 3: Enchantress vs. Deathblade
Interview with Enchantress player
Round 4: Mentor Miracles vs. Jund
You don't have to run the same 75 cards that so-and-so did at GP Louisville. It's your choice to do that or do something different. Play Legacy because it's fun and has a huge card pool. If you're feeling jaded, consider what you could do with newly printed cards, and spend some time in the New and Developmental Decks forum. Also, the Seattle scene isn't unique to brewing. If you explore TCDecks, you'll find lots of interesting ideas on display.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)