Page 68 of 69 FirstFirst ... 1858646566676869 LastLast
Results 1,341 to 1,360 of 1373

Thread: The current state of Magic

  1. #1341
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Zombie View Post
    I was just going to ask if my hobby's prehistoric: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9tv_-8sBkY (Super Street Fighter II Turbo, or ST for short)
    I never had a system as a kid, but would play it often at a friend's house. Positively prehistoric.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce View Post
    Nobody remembers Total Annihilation. Nothing more satisfying than the old "ARM VERMIN HAVE BEEN EXTERMINATED."
    CORE for life! That game was both great and not so much at the same time. It was neat for a while, but eventually we would just stick to Starcraft, for custom games and the like.

    Two games I loved but no one really played: Deadlock (Deadlock 2 was OK as well) and Rise of Nations.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  2. #1342
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Matsu View Post
    Lands of Lore anyone?
    Warcraft 1 or C&C and the one and only Kane!
    C&C owns

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yMy7JuGpJM
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatDeleuzeGuy View Post
    I want to play as close to possible a 100% reactive deck that also approached 0% variance in how it played. I want to play magic with as little variance as possible. Also had a foiled out miracles deck that was an investment of about 6 grand that is now nearly worthless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    My original post did that.

    I'd love to have a battle of wits with you but I see you lack the necessary equipment.

    Good day.

  3. #1343

    Re: The current state of Magic

    This is really a prescriptivist vs. descriptivist thing. I am obviously the latter.

    I'd be interested to know what you think of the "is a hot dog a sandwich?" debate. I have a guess.

    Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
    The nomenclature and the "legitimacy" are not one thing. Sports might be considered by many people more "legitimate" but that is not an intrinsic quality, that is a cultural valuation.

    Yes, and part of the cultural valuation is the words we choose to use. "Nerd" was formerly a pejorative, and is no longer, because of changing use and cultural attitudes. Words have meanings, but the meanings aren't static. They change over time.

    So, no, it isn't just an issue of nomenclature that gives us the valuation, it's our personal values.

    Again, which is it, then? Do words have immutable definitions, or do we define them personally?

    It's also nonsensical to think that people like traditional sport solely for the fact that they require skill. Although could be a part of some people's enjoyment, another part of sport that appeals to people is the simplicity. The world's most popular sport, football, is fantastically simple, and that is a key to it's success.

    I mean, American Football and Baseball are both extremely complicated, and are both very popular. I agree that simplicity will enable widespread appeal, but I don't think it's the driving factor. Why do we keep track of records, and debate which players were the greatest of all time? Because the fundamental nature of sport is excellence, whether it's with a ball, bat, mouse, or controller.

    Why doesn't Magic have the same appeal? Because it is much less intuitive, much harder to conceptualize and with it's fantasy styling, seems "childish" to people.

    Again, those opinions change, and are fluid. Boxing, for instance, was once a preeminent component of the American sports landscape, but has since fallen from grace because it's seen as dangerous and barbaric. It's possible to argue American Football is on the same trajectory, as a consequence of new knowledge about TBI and the unsettling conduct of the players off the field.
    Quote Originally Posted by niv View Post
    It's not, there are lines between what words mean. Just because you like using the phrase 'professional sport' more than 'professional gaming' doesn't change the meaning of the words themselves.

    As a descriptivist, the meaning of words comes from how we use them.

    Again, I used several very specific traits that encompass the words 'Athletic' and 'Sport'. Right from a dictionary.

    The dictionary is a snapshot, it changes.

    Most here with real input haven't reduced it to 'running good gaming bad'

    Maybe I'm misinterpreting it, but it really feels to me like you're trying to separate them on that basis that calling games "sports" is the consequence of nerds aspiring to more than they're worth, which seems to imply "running good, gaming bad," as you've put it.

    They have the same word in it. The phrase 'eSport' is an abuse anyway. To hark back to the same example, no one calls competitive poker an e-sport even though it's also a 'competitive game you can watch online'

    Yes, and that's fine. People have an intuitive understanding that poker requires skill, and that the stakes in it are high, because the money is physically present at the table. Also, you may recall that the premier event in Poker is the "World Series of Poker"...

    Professional gaming in general is boring as all fuck to a layman. Unless one is deeply invested/involved with most of these games, if you've never played them before they're borderline impossible to understand.

    I don't think League and American football differ considerably in complexity. In fact, I think they share several attributes: Tanks, DPS, Carries, Supports, and Junglers all have parallels in Linemen, Receivers, Quarterbacks, Defensive Backs, and Special Teams, and the objective of both games is to bring your offense to bear on the opposing team by exploiting asymmetries in positioning (get your tank on the carry, get your linemen to sack the quarterback). Many of the same things can be said of Overwatch, and in that game there's even a Payload (ball) you push to get yardage(!).

    League can even have more interesting things going on at once, because both teams are on offense and defense at the same time, and there's a macro element that resembles clock management in football but has the potential to be more varied and interesting.

    Anyone who is an American Football fan is perfectly capable of understanding a game of League or Overwatch. Maybe if they realized they have more in common than they do different, they'd give it a shot, and maybe one way to get them to realize that is branding!


    Add to this the fact that games like League, Overwatch and friends change month-by-month? Insanity to someone involved with professional sports. I don't think that strategies get invalidated as often as they do in competitive games due to the rules of the game changing. Football (hell, American and otherwise) likely has strategies that have been good for decades, and yet the game doesn't get stale.

    I'll admit that I'm not an expert in standard sports either, but the notion that they rarely change is not true - football has had many small rules changes ("patches," if you will) that people perseverate over constantly. Here is a list of changes, they make a couple every year, which is not all that different from seasonal changes in Overwatch or any other game.

    Plus, even if a former meta lineup changes, is it really all that different if the new Carry is Cait instead of Ashe, or if running an extra tank is strong because Ana got released with killer numbers? The fundamentals are the same, and these changes are the kind of thing sports fans love to debate/hear about from the in-game commentators - I would argue they are a boon.
    P.S.: A hot dog is a sandwich.

  4. #1344
    GrimGrin and Glissa are in a boat...

    Join Date

    Jan 2013
    Location

    French Riviera
    Posts

    1,209

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Man i was looking for the name of this game...
    Command & conquer!

    One of the first games i played in a LAN (On PC because i had already played some games on amiga with Null cable in direct connection) along Duke Nukem !

  5. #1345
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Tylert View Post
    Man i was looking for the name of this game...
    Command & conquer!

    One of the first games i played in a LAN (On PC because i had already played some games on amiga with Null cable in direct connection) along Duke Nukem !
    Original C&C circa ~1995 is still one of my favorites. Several of its successors are good; but the original got so much right for basically inventing a genre. I was truly inspired the last time I played it. I remember the first time I played it, maybe I was 9 or so; I was sleeping over at a friends house, they showed me the game and I don't think I hung out with them the rest of the night. To be fair to myself; that kid was a douche. But his game was pretty great.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Wrong. Gideon Emblem protect you from losing and you can even open your binder and slam some cards on the board, not even the HJ can DQ you now.

  6. #1346
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Location

    New Jersey
    Posts

    218

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Yes and the National Baseball League (EDIT: Major League Baseball. How I did that is beyond me.) championship is referred to as The WORLD Series. And there's a Miss UNIVERSE beauty pageant. And let's not forget WORLDStar Hip Hop.

    Give me a break dude. If I wanted to play language games I would have gone into academia.

  7. #1347
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by taconaut View Post
    This is really a prescriptivist vs. descriptivist thing. I am obviously the latter.

    I'd be interested to know what you think of the "is a hot dog a sandwich?" debate. I have a guess.

    P.S.: A hot dog is a sandwich.
    If the definition of "sandwich" is meat between two slices of bread, then yes. However, this would tend to get you into trouble, because if you have something like pepperoni on pizza and you fold it in half, that too is a "sandwich." However, that isn't really how people use the term sandwich. Not to mention, a hot dog isn't guaranteed to be eaten between bread. Our kids never do, they don't like buns. So, no, a "hot dog" is not a sandwich, but it is something that could be eaten as a nominal "sandwich."

    Quote Originally Posted by taconaut View Post
    Yes, and part of the cultural valuation is the words we choose to use. "Nerd" was formerly a pejorative, and is no longer, because of changing use and cultural attitudes. Words have meanings, but the meanings aren't static. They change over time.
    I'm not changing the meaning of sports. In fact, I am keeping it the same. The definition of nerd hasn't changed, only the value associated with the term. So, what you want is an overarching broad meaning change to the word sport. I'm not for that. What you also want is a different valuation of the word game. I'm fine with that.

    Quote Originally Posted by taconaut View Post
    Again, which is it, then? Do words have immutable definitions, or do we define them personally?
    Words are defined inter-subjectively. You can have any definition of a word that you like. That doesn't mean people are going to agree with you. You want to change the definition of sport to include any game, or at least the games you define as "skillful." I am against that. So, here we are. Could we arbitrarily call anything in the world a sport? Sure. But that would make the word so broad to be essentially meaningless.

    Quote Originally Posted by taconaut View Post
    I mean, American Football and Baseball are both extremely complicated, and are both very popular. I agree that simplicity will enable widespread appeal, but I don't think it's the driving factor. Why do we keep track of records, and debate which players were the greatest of all time? Because the fundamental nature of sport is excellence, whether it's with a ball, bat, mouse, or controller.
    Again, this precludes a very broad definition of sport which I don't agree with. You can achieve excellence in many things, that doesn't qualify it as a sport by definition. And I'd still disagree that Baseball or Football are all that complicated, but that is really besides the point.

    Quote Originally Posted by taconaut View Post
    Again, those opinions change, and are fluid. Boxing, for instance, was once a preeminent component of the American sports landscape, but has since fallen from grace because it's seen as dangerous and barbaric. It's possible to argue American Football is on the same trajectory, as a consequence of new knowledge about TBI and the unsettling conduct of the players off the field.
    Sure, people's opinion's change, as does their assignment of value. None of this precludes a definitional, or conceptual change, to the nature of sports. What you seem to be hung up on is that since sports are given cultural value, anything you want to have the same cultural value should be labeled a sport. I'm not buying that. If you want the cultural acceptance, change the culture. That's what happened to the term "nerd." It didn't conceptually drift into meaning the same as "jock" or "aficionado" or anything. It still means the same as it always did. It just doesn't have the negative connotation it once did.

    Boxing isn't suddenly not a sport because people don't like to watch it. A game isn't suddenly a sport just people some people do like to watch it.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  8. #1348

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce View Post
    Nobody remembers Total Annihilation. Nothing more satisfying than the old "ARM VERMIN HAVE BEEN EXTERMINATED."
    I have some ancient and vague memories of Total Annihiliation Kingdoms. "Castle building on. Castle building off. Command me!"

  9. #1349

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Zombie View Post
    RA1 DOS installer
    Let me tell you about Madden '95, NHL '97 and the boost-disks I needed to play them.

  10. #1350

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    No idea, I think the better question is "Who here buys sealed product"? Outside of draft I don't.

    On that topic, this set has been sweet for draft.

    I love that image. What about those of us who's thought was "System Shock, Halo CE and Golden Eye"? Hell Alex Kid anyone? Duck Hunt. Wow I am starting to feel old.
    I only buy sealed so I have a stack of booster packs for EDH where I play Booster Tutor.

  11. #1351
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
    words
    Friend arguing with a pedant is just like arguing with someone with an anime avatar. Nothing constructive will ever come out of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatDeleuzeGuy View Post
    I want to play as close to possible a 100% reactive deck that also approached 0% variance in how it played. I want to play magic with as little variance as possible. Also had a foiled out miracles deck that was an investment of about 6 grand that is now nearly worthless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    My original post did that.

    I'd love to have a battle of wits with you but I see you lack the necessary equipment.

    Good day.

  12. #1352
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by CptHaddock View Post
    Friend arguing with a pedant is just like arguing with someone with an anime avatar. Nothing constructive will ever come out of it.
    What about a pedant who has an anime avatar; like a double-negative thing?

    Getting back on topic: Brainstorm is a sport; fight me
    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Wrong. Gideon Emblem protect you from losing and you can even open your binder and slam some cards on the board, not even the HJ can DQ you now.

  13. #1353
    Hamburglar Hlelpler
    TsumiBand's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Nebraska
    Posts

    2,774

    Re: The current state of Magic

    If you have to cover it with a napkin before you get up so that your friends don't punch it, it's a sandwich. How hard is that, honestly
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Creature type - 'Fuck you mooooooom'
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    EDIT: Tsumi, you are silly.

  14. #1354

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    If you have to cover it with a napkin before you get up so that your friends don't punch it, it's a sandwich. How hard is that, honestly
    Because... What?

  15. #1355
    Hamburglar Hlelpler
    TsumiBand's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Nebraska
    Posts

    2,774

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by FourDogsinaHorseSuit View Post
    Because... What?
    If you have to ask you really don't want to know.

    And if you already know, you better cover your fucking hot dogs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Creature type - 'Fuck you mooooooom'
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    EDIT: Tsumi, you are silly.

  16. #1356
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by FourDogsinaHorseSuit View Post
    Because... What?
    Never heard of Sandwich Punch?

    Well, now you are tainted. Somethings are better left unknown.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  17. #1357
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Lmao one of the first links that came up was this: http://www.archive.themanadrain.com/...?topic=33623.0
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatDeleuzeGuy View Post
    I want to play as close to possible a 100% reactive deck that also approached 0% variance in how it played. I want to play magic with as little variance as possible. Also had a foiled out miracles deck that was an investment of about 6 grand that is now nearly worthless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    My original post did that.

    I'd love to have a battle of wits with you but I see you lack the necessary equipment.

    Good day.

  18. #1358
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: The current state of Magic

    What the fuck wrong with you folks in the flyovers?
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatDeleuzeGuy View Post
    I want to play as close to possible a 100% reactive deck that also approached 0% variance in how it played. I want to play magic with as little variance as possible. Also had a foiled out miracles deck that was an investment of about 6 grand that is now nearly worthless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    My original post did that.

    I'd love to have a battle of wits with you but I see you lack the necessary equipment.

    Good day.

  19. #1359

    Re: The current state of Magic

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    If you have to cover it with a napkin before you get up so that your friends don't punch it, it's a sandwich. How hard is that, honestly


    Perfection as usual Tsumi

  20. #1360

    Re: The current state of Magic

    If you want me to not hang out with you anymore, please be an adult and say so instead of punching my sandwich like an asshole.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)