Page 6 of 21 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 411

Thread: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

  1. #101

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Tried a list with JVP after I read Ben Friedman's thoughts on the deck
    The argument about how early pressure / chip shots makes little sense in a deck with no burn and 5/5 and 10/10 finishers is quite convincing

    2 Tombstalker
    2 Jace, Vryn's Prodigy
    4 Street Wraith
    4 Death's Shadow

    4 Ponder
    4 Brainstorm
    2 Preordain
    4 Thoughtseize
    4 Daze
    4 Force of Will
    3 Hymn to Tourach
    2 Reanimate
    2 Dismember
    1 Fatal Push
    1 Darkblast

    4 Watery Grave
    2 Underground Sea
    8 Fetchlands
    3 Wasteland

    SB
    2 Liliana, the Last Hope
    2 Ratchet Bomb
    3 Diabolic Edict
    3 Surgical Extraction
    1 Infernal Contract
    1 Spell Pierce
    1 Flusterstorm
    1 Marsh Casualties
    1 Dread of Night

    First Event (literally never cast a JVP before in my life I don't think)
    2-1 UW Stoneblade
    2-1 UR Delver
    0-2 Chalice Post
    2-0 Elves
    Top 4 Concession (we split prizes already so my opponent went home)
    Finals 0-2 Chalice Post (same guy) [I played really badly in the finals but it seems like a horrible matchup]

    Second event
    2-0 MonoB Reanimator (no depths)
    2-1 Miracles
    2-0 Enchantress (non-Wish build)

    Maybe the dread of night can be the third bomb. The Flusterstorm is the other flex slot

    Infernal contract seems nuts. I mis-sequenced against miracles and cast it on 3 which put me to 1 and disabled my FoW, but it would have still been way better than Bitterblossom in that spot. I also cast it against enchantress and it gave me enough fuel for FoW to stop Solitary Confinement from resolving.

    So far this is looking like my #1 candidate for GP Niagara Falls

  2. #102

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Positive experience taking out delvers for JVP etc

    Having 3 edicts helps a lot against several matchups.

  3. #103

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    After feeling a bit threat-light and noticing darkblast being a brick in a couple of games I'm going to swap the maindeck Darkblast with one of the SB Lilianas
    I still think 3 Liliana in the 75 is too many and am going to keep the 1-1 split of Liliana and Contract in the sideboard

  4. #104

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    It looks like we'll get a few upgrades in War of the Spark

    Liliana's Triumph should replace Diabolic Edict. Contentious Plans might be a good sideboard card against Chalice, similar to Throne of Geth but replaces itself, flips Delver, and pitches to Force.

    Speaking of anti-Chalice tech, I have been trying Vampire Hexmage. I like that it lines up well against Baleful Strix and can also sink a Planeswalker against UBx control.

  5. #105

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Hi all, I've been messing around a bit with UB Shadow online now that the London mull is legal. Agree with the Ben Friedman article about JVP being better than Delver in this kind of deck.

    Current list:


    4 Bloodstained Mire
    4 Polluted Delta
    1 Verdant Catacombs
    4 Watery Grave
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Swamp
    1 Dark Ritual

    4 Ponder
    4 Brainstorm
    2 Preordain

    4 Death's Shadow
    2 Jace, Vryn's Prodigy
    2 Liliana, the Last Hope
    2 Gurmag Angler
    1 Tombstalker

    4 Force of Will
    4 Thoughtseize
    4 Hymn to Tourach
    3 Daze
    2 Spell Pierce

    2 Fatal Push
    1 Recoil
    1 Dismember
    1 Marsh Casualties

    SB:
    3 Surgical Extraction
    2 Diabolic Edict
    2 Echoing Truth
    2 Flusterstorm
    1 Dread of Night
    1 Null Rod
    1 Tsabo's Web
    1 Marsh Casualties
    1 Gloom
    1 Infernal Contract


    Some of the choices are a bit unconventional, but there's honestly some method behind the madness!:

    - No Street Wraith. I've found the card underwhelming. Sure there's a floor on how bad a 2 life cycler can be, but it's so bad late-game when your life total is too low to reasonably cycle. The body is a bit underwhelming and the Reanimate 'combo' is unexciting unless you can follow it up with multiple Shadows. It also takes up a chunk of non-blue slots in the deck and I believe it's possible to prove mathematically that it never cycles into a land when you need it to, while always cycling into a land when you need gas.

    - Four Hymn to Tourach. I was sick of not drawing Hymns vs Miracles and combo. The fine people of MtGO deserve to receive Tourach's blessing multiple times in a game of Magic IMHO.

    - 16 black-producing lands to combo with Hymn to Tourach. Extra lands also help to offset the loss of 'free' life-loss from Street Wraith.

    - Zero Wasteland since it does not cast Hymn to Tourach. Also, people are playing a lot of basic lands online at the moment.

    - Main-deck Lilianas have been great -- a threat against control, removal spell vs creature decks, acceleration for delve fatties, digging for spells for JVP to cast.

    - A fun-of Dark Ritual. I added this to an earlier build that only ran 15 lands figuring that it might be marginally better than the 16th land, but it's been pretty entertaining so I've kept it even after upping the land count. Turn one Lilly is obviously great vs a lot of decks, but even accelerating out a delve fatty can be good a lot of the time.

    - Recoil is a bit of a pet card, but I think it's useful to have a main-deck answer to problematic permanents. Without Wasteland, stuff like Maze of Ith is a real pain. This list is also super-weak to Turbo Depths so it's handy to have a way to answer Marit Lage.

    - I'm not 100% sure about the removal config. Main-deck Marsh Casualities feels excellent against a lot of decks. I've been going back and forth on 2 Push / 1 Dismember and 1 Push / 2 Dismember.

    - Sideboard Tsabo's Web for Maze of Ith.

    - Sideboard Echoing Truth for Leylines, Marit Lage, Chalices. EoT bounce their stuff, main-phase Hymn to Tourach never gets old.

    - SB Infernal Contract probably came from kombatkiwi's post. It's been amazing for me. I love the Mirage version's flavour text. I love drawing cards. You know it's a good card when it has three skulls in the casting cost.

    Anyway, I've been really enjoying this list so thought I'd share.

  6. #106

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    I went 10-5 at GP Niagara Falls and came 94th (IIRC)

    Chalice Post 2-1
    Bant Foodchain 2-0
    Grixis Delver 2-0
    UR Delver 2-0
    UW Blade 2-1
    UW Blade 2-0
    Grixis Control 0-2
    Infect 0-2
    UW Blade 2-0
    Eldrazi Stompy 1-2
    Enchantress 0-2
    URb Delver 2-0
    Chalice Post 2-1
    Architect Merfolk 2-1
    URb Delver 1-2

    ('URb Delver' seems mostly UR just with bitterblossom SB)

    The match I lost vs Grixis Control I think I was playing a bit loose and the match vs Infect was just a punt. The final round I also could have maybe played a bit better but the Enchantress matchup was totally unwinnable and the 1-2 vs Eldrazi was close but I don't think there was anything I clearly should have done differently

    List:

    4 Death's Shadow
    4 Street Wrath
    2 Tombstalker
    2 Jace, Vryn's Prodigy

    4 Force of Will
    4 Daze
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    4 Thoughtseize
    3 Hymn to Tourach
    2 Preordain
    2 Reanimate
    2 Dismember
    1 Fatal Push
    1 Liliana the Last Hope

    4 Watery Grave
    2 Underground Sea
    3 Wasteland
    2 Polluted Delta
    1 Scalding Tarn
    1 Flooded Strand
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Verdant Catacombs
    1 Marsh Flats
    1 Bloodstained Mire

    SB
    3 Ratchet Bomb
    3 Diabolic Edict
    3 Surgical Extraction
    1 Liliana, the Last Hope
    1 Infernal Contract
    1 Dread of Night
    1 Toxic Deluge
    1 Darkblast
    1 Spell Pierce

    Basically what I think about the JVP version compared to Delver is that:
    - It's better against fair blue decks because it grinds better. This includes Stoneblade and Miracles, but probably also those random decks like Food Chain. I think overall it's also slightly better against Delver decks, but because you don't have your own cheap turn1 threats there are a slightly increased frequency of games where you get Delver/Daze/Wasted out
    - It's much worse against every deck that is trying to prey on fair blue decks, because the easiest way to beat these decks is by aggroing them out with Delver/Daze/Waste before they can lock your mana or reach a lategame that goes over the top of Hymn/Jace. If your opponent has Thalia or Eye of Ugin or Blood Moon in their deck then Delver is much better than JVP
    - The Delver version is probably slightly better against combo but this is negligible-ish because Jace can also be quite strong vs combo

    It might be possible to play a hybrid Wrapter/Friedman Hymn + Delver version, which I have had some success with in the past, which gives you some of the benefits of both setups

    The only card from the GP 75 I might change (assuming I still want to play JVP) is the 2nd reanimate in the maindeck (possibly to the 4th Hymn or 4th waste depending on what meta you are expecting, but I'm not sure what I would change this to or if I even want to change it at all) and the Toxic Deluge in the SB (to a cheaper removal spell like Marsh Casualties, 2nd Darkblast, Push etc to improve the matchup against Delver and DNT). [edit: and of course Diabolic Edict becomes Liliana's Triumph]

  7. #107

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Is this deck dead? Is this thread dead? Is the Source dead? No.

    Is took Death’s Shadow to a local 3K. Trying Snuff Out over Dismember since there are more non-black creatures I want to remove lately. In the sideboard, trying out Plague Engineer as well as Force of Negation in the slots I would normally dedicate to answers to Chalice of the Void.

    4 Death’s Shadow
    4 Delver of Secrets
    4 Street Wraith
    2 Gurmag Angler
    2 Reanimate
    3 Ponder
    1 Preordain
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Daze
    4 Force of Will
    2 Stubborn Denial
    4 Thoughtseize
    2 Fatal Push
    2 Snuff Out
    4 Wasteland
    3 Watery Grave
    2 Underground Sea
    9 Fetchlands

    2 Force of Negation
    1 Diabolic Edict
    2 Dread of Night
    2 Hymn to Tourach
    2 Liliana, the Last Hope
    1 Plague Engineer
    3 Surgical Extraction
    1 Engineered Explosives
    1 Nihil Spellbomb

    Round 1 v. Wrenn Pile
    I am able to take advantage of opponent’s clunkiness with some good aggro draws involving reanimated Street Wraiths. 2-0.

    Round 2 v. Miracles
    Despite opponent receiving a game loss for showing up late, we can’t finish 2 games. I am way ahead game 3, but my Delvers just don’t flip and can’t close it out in time.
    1-1.

    Round 3 v. Slow Depths
    I find the right interaction at the right times with help from Thoughtseize and cantrips, so Wasteland and Force of Will prevent opponent from doing much. 2-0.

    Round 4 v. Snow Wrenn Pile
    With a creature-heavy hand, I push lethal through two Baleful Strixes game 1. Game 2, opponent gets stuck on two mana long enough for me to close it out. 2-0.

    Round 5 v. Bomberman
    I lose game 1 to turn-one Chalice. Game 2 plays out normally and I ride disruption, a good Hymn, and creatures to victory. Game 3 is quite interesting. Opponent goes all in on a turn-one Mystic Forge. I cycle Street Wraith into Force of Negation to counter it, but I don’t have a threat for a while and opponent resolves Chalice on 1. I already spent my Engineered Explosives to clear a Ballista and Mox, so it is there for good, but I resolve a Plague Engineer on Monk with Wasteland and Forces to control the game. Plague Engineer does all 20. 2-1.

    Round 6 v. Maverick
    Both games, opponent aggressively Wastelands me. Both games, I find the lands to recover and Wasteland back. Opponent does not recover in time. 2-0.

    Round 7 ID into top 8

    Quarters opponent does not show up.

    Semis v. 4c “Loam”
    This match was streamed. You can watch CFB Game Center’s VOD on twitch. Game 1 I win through early Chalice on 1 with reanimated Street Wraith, Gurmag Angler, and Snuff Out. Game 2, I am ahead, but go too low, forgetting about Punishing Fire. Oops. Game 3, I keep in the hopes that I can Thoughtseize away his Chalice. Unfortunately, it wasn’t in hand but on the top of the deck. From there, opponent runs away with the game with Wrenn and Liliana of the Veil. I didn’t really have a sideboard plan for this match, and in retrospect, wish I kept more of my main deck intact.

    Overall, I think Snuff Out performed well. I cut it versus Strix decks anyway and good against Knights even though can’t get Dark Confident versus Loam. Plague Engineer was also great as a proactive answer to 1/1s. Force of Negation was alright, but since 3 out of 4 of my game losses were to Chalice, I think I might go back to a stronger anti-Chalice card like Contentious Plan.

  8. #108
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2017
    Location

    Oita, Japan
    Posts

    25

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    How have you been liking contentious plans? I have been really curious as to how that card is working for people.

    I am actually thinking of making this deck in legacy and turning my legacy goblins deck into a modern deck. How has the deck been performing as a whole for you? Haven't seen many people playing this deck recently.

    The cool thing about shadow decks is that you can really make any color combo you want and they all play very differently. Could splash green for sylvan library, berserk, and traverse the ulvenwald, etc.

  9. #109

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Quote Originally Posted by joaquin View Post
    How have you been liking contentious plans? I have been really curious as to how that card is working for people.

    I am actually thinking of making this deck in legacy and turning my legacy goblins deck into a modern deck. How has the deck been performing as a whole for you? Haven't seen many people playing this deck recently.
    I have enjoyed Contentious Plan as a focused answer to Chalice. I usually feel so happy when I have it to tick a Chalice to 2 that I don't even think about the extra card, then I look at my hand with a new card and think, "oh yeah, I get that too." It just depends on how much you want for Chalice alone as it really doesn't have other utility.

    I think the deck takes a hit because the spell-based combo decks are less popular while game-winning permanents that UB has a though time answering are abundant (Teferi, Bridge, Chalice, Wrenn + Wasteland, Karn, etc.). You just have to hope to get under these. When URx delver decks were gaining in popularity recently, I thought the deck felt quite good, as our mana-base and creatures are just better than theirs.

    EDIT: One more thing on Contentious Plan. I've had one other use for it that has actually been nice: tick Blast Zone to 2 to save my creatures.

  10. #110

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Quote Originally Posted by aedrew View Post
    I have enjoyed Contentious Plan as a focused answer to Chalice. I usually feel so happy when I have it to tick a Chalice to 2 that I don't even think about the extra card, then I look at my hand with a new card and think, "oh yeah, I get that too." It just depends on how much you want for Chalice alone as it really doesn't have other utility.

    I think the deck takes a hit because the spell-based combo decks are less popular while game-winning permanents that UB has a though time answering are abundant (Teferi, Bridge, Chalice, Wrenn + Wasteland, Karn, etc.). You just have to hope to get under these. When URx delver decks were gaining in popularity recently, I thought the deck felt quite good, as our mana-base and creatures are just better than theirs.

    EDIT: One more thing on Contentious Plan. I've had one other use for it that has actually been nice: tick Blast Zone to 2 to save my creatures.
    If you're playing the no-2-drop delver version of the deck then Contentious Plan seems good.
    If you're playing the more controlling version of the deck with hymn/JVP then it obviously won't work though (unless you can somehow find a SB map for chalice decks where you board them all out)

  11. #111

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Agree with the above. Contentious Plans is a very good focused answer to Chalice, but obviously a much worse card overall that doesn't have any other applications really. I've been liking a split between the two, like 1-2 or 2-1. That is all for the Delver list, not the JVP list.

    Speaking of which, I'd been following the Delver vs JVP discussion a little back then and in my opinion you can't say one is better than the other. They're fundamentally different decks. The former is in the first place a Delver deck that differentiates itself from other Delver deck by sticking to only two colors and playing the Shadow/Wraith/Reanimate package alongside Anglers as its creatures number 5-12. That gives it a niche in the metagame for having a slightly more stable mana base, having arguably the best matchup against spell-based combo out of all the Delver decks and having the edge in the Delver mirror because its creatures are bigger, while being worse against most control strategies, especially those that play Plows.

    The JVP list definitely plays the more powerful cards, but that can be said about any midrange or control deck in Legacy when compared with any Delver deck. My fear is that, quite frankly, JVP is not a particularly good card in Legacy and any deck that plays it as its two-drop of choice should ask itself if that's because it's actually good or just because they don't have access to other options due to color restrictions. I haven't seen any deck with access to red, green or even white play JVP in a very long time. I admit I haven't tested the JVP Shadow list too much and when I played it it was good, but those 2 JVPs never stood out as particularly strong. Was it a viable deck? Yes. Would it be an even better deck with a third color and other two-drops over JVP? Quite possibly.

  12. #112
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2015
    Location

    PDX
    Posts

    2,477

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    JVP is the Snapcaster of Daze/Wasteland + lower land count strategies, allowing the trip to 3-4 mana with an untap step. It's rather harmonious alongside Delver, because there would be no way to really capitalize on the early game advantages of Daze/WL without Delver.

  13. #113

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    JVP is the Snapcaster of Daze/Wasteland + lower land count strategies, allowing the trip to 3-4 mana with an untap step. It's rather harmonious alongside Delver, because there would be no way to really capitalize on the early game advantages of Daze/WL without Delver.
    Well the argument is that the extra card advantage from JVP allows you to play more of an attrition game with Hymn/Thoughtseize flashbacks, and then you can ride to victory on the back of 1 Shadow/Angler rather than needing extra threats in the form of Delver to aggro people out. I think it's hard to construct a list with Delver AND JVP where the ratios of threats/cantrips/disruption/mana make sense

    Agree with the above. Contentious Plans is a very good focused answer to Chalice, but obviously a much worse card overall that doesn't have any other applications really. I've been liking a split between the two, like 1-2 or 2-1. That is all for the Delver list, not the JVP list.

    Speaking of which, I'd been following the Delver vs JVP discussion a little back then and in my opinion you can't say one is better than the other. They're fundamentally different decks. The former is in the first place a Delver deck that differentiates itself from other Delver deck by sticking to only two colors and playing the Shadow/Wraith/Reanimate package alongside Anglers as its creatures number 5-12. That gives it a niche in the metagame for having a slightly more stable mana base, having arguably the best matchup against spell-based combo out of all the Delver decks and having the edge in the Delver mirror because its creatures are bigger, while being worse against most control strategies, especially those that play Plows.

    The JVP list definitely plays the more powerful cards, but that can be said about any midrange or control deck in Legacy when compared with any Delver deck. My fear is that, quite frankly, JVP is not a particularly good card in Legacy and any deck that plays it as its two-drop of choice should ask itself if that's because it's actually good or just because they don't have access to other options due to color restrictions. I haven't seen any deck with access to red, green or even white play JVP in a very long time. I admit I haven't tested the JVP Shadow list too much and when I played it it was good, but those 2 JVPs never stood out as particularly strong. Was it a viable deck? Yes. Would it be an even better deck with a third color and other two-drops over JVP? Quite possibly.
    Just because they're different decks doesn't mean you can't say one is better than the other, you can say Sneak and Show is better than Spanish Inquisition just by looking at winrates, you don't need to assess how similar the decks are.

    JVP is a lot like Dreadhorde Arcanist, the fundamental difference is that Dreadhorde Arcanist doesn't work with Hymn to Tourach. (Both because Hymn costs 2 so Arcanist can't target it and because Arcanist cost R so you would be a Grixis deck that needs at least URBB). You want to have Hymn in Shadow rather than e.g. Bolts because Hymn is more impactful as disruption and your threats are such heavy-hitters you don't need help to win matches by racing.

    Or to put it another way, JVP shadow seems to have the exact combination of
    a) Wanting to play the card Hymn to Tourach
    b) Not wanting to have more than 2 lands
    c) Space in the deck for a value 2drop

    If you cut JVP then either
    - You keep Hymn but you spend the value slot on another card in another colour (or Snapcasters) because nothing else exists in UB: to keep the manabase stable basics are needed and the curve skews higher so you end up with Grixis Control or some kind of Thief of Sanity deck
    - You cut JVP for Dreadhorde Arcanist but now Hymn is awkward, so because you're playing Red now you replace them with Bolts and this cascade probably means that you end up with Grixis Delver
    - You decide that you don't need a value 2drop and just go back to playing Delver Shadow, either you keep the Hymns or replace them with other disruption like Stubborn Denials

    In terms of the actual play pattern of the card ("this is really good if you untap with it but otherwise costs 2 mana and dies easily") it's really not much different to Dreadhorde Arcanist at all. It can't flashback every single turn but it interacts better with other spells the deck wants to be playing anyway (Hymn, Dismember), the Loot is okay, pitches to FoW, etc. UR Delver doesn't want to play JVP because UR is a much more aggressive deck than Shadow and JVP is a much less aggressive card than Arcanist, also even if you argue Arcanist is abstractly a better card than JVP that deck is already in the right colour, so we accept this "worse" 2drop under the assumption that being able to play TS/Hymn is worth it

  14. #114
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2015
    Location

    SWFL
    Posts

    72

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    The primary difference is Arcanist is generating mana. With JVP you still have to pay the cost. Flashing back a cantrip with Arcanist so you can make your third land drop and basically have 4 mana worth of spells cast in a turn is what makes it such a great tempo boost.

    JVP is reasonable in shadow but not nearly as powerful as Arcanist honestly.

  15. #115

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    I don't think the comparison is fair either, Arcanist is a significantly better card than JVP because it 1) virtually generates mana, 2) it works every turn unlike JVP who only flashbacks something once before needing to recharge and 3) actually wins the game on its own.

    A zero mana Thoughtseize is likely to be the better turn 3 play than a 2 mana Hymn, so whenever you feel like pairing Arcanist with discard effects you can easily do that and play Grixis, maybe even with an Inquisition or two. Sure, Hymn is technically CA while flashing back a TS isn't, though the turn after you'll flashback another spell with Arcanist while JVP sits there shrinking a creature, so over time Arcanist actually generates more CA than Jace. There's exactly that one turn frame where Jace is technically up on CA, though as I said it's significantly behind on mana at the same time. Arcanist will also hit for 4 every turn in a UR(x) shell, so it will actually win the game instead of sitting around.

    If the goal was to go bigger than Delver but stay under Grixis Control then sure, Delverless Shadow is a good deck. All I'm saying is that the Delver vs JVP as cards debate shouldn't be a thing. Delver is the backbone of traditional UB Shadow while JVP is more of a concession to the lack of a third color that would offer better two-drops in the new variant. The only other options are Snapcaster and Strix, and at that point you're probably close to just a worse Grixis Control.

    I also didn't quite understand the point where Friedman said he and Firer were on the same basic strategies with his deck and that he liked his take on UW Delver. Firer played Delvers alongside midrange cards like SFM and he liked it because Delvers can eat the removals for SFM. Well didn't we have just exactly that same element in Delver Shadow and didn't he just decide against that concept himself?

    Just because they're different decks doesn't mean you can't say one is better than the other, you can say Sneak and Show is better than Spanish Inquisition just by looking at winrates, you don't need to assess how similar the decks are.
    Are there any results that back up the fact that JVP lists are objectively better? If you compare them to Sneak and Show vs Spanish Inquisition I'd expect to see JVPs in every major tournament top8/16.

  16. #116

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    If the goal was to go bigger than Delver but stay under Grixis Control then sure, Delverless Shadow is a good deck... The only other options are Snapcaster and Strix, and at that point you're probably close to just a worse Grixis Control.
    This is almost exactly what I said except "Delver is the backbone of traditional UB Shadow" is not a statement that has any value. "JVP is a concession to the lack of a third colour" yes this is essentially what I said, but this doesn't provide any info as to whether the Delver version or the JVP version is better.

    I also didn't quite understand the point where Friedman said he and Firer were on the same basic strategies with his deck and that he liked his take on UW Delver. Firer played Delvers alongside midrange cards like SFM and he liked it because Delvers can eat the removals for SFM. Well didn't we have just exactly that same element in Delver Shadow and didn't he just decide against that concept himself?
    I don't know this story and the way that you tell it is confusing (so many he-him it's difficult to figure out who thought what) but I dislike UW Delver for basically the same reason I don't like Delver in UB Shadow.

    Are there any results that back up the fact that JVP lists are objectively better? If you compare them to Sneak and Show vs Spanish Inquisition I'd expect to see JVPs in every major tournament top8/16.
    I wasn't trying to imply no-Delver is better than Delver to the same extent that SNS is better than Spanish Inquisition, just that the idea of "you can't say deck A is better than deck B if they are different strategies" is a bad way of approaching deck building/selection.

  17. #117
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2015
    Location

    PDX
    Posts

    2,477

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    There's a lot of things being mashed up. The main issue with this deck is that Delver has been stranded by itself as a 1cmc (turn 1) threat b/c DRS got banned, and there are precisely zero 1cmc black creatures to fill that void (because this deck isn't called Zombardment - the one exception to this black 1cmc vacuum). JVP/Arcanist/Gurmag won't ever fix this structural instability.

    The set slots are 4x Delver + 4x DRS analogue [does not exist] + 4x Shadow [i.e. UB's Goyf]. Being a Delver deck caps you at 15-16 creatures, and you're putting basically all those remaining slots into Gurmag [the TNN-payoff slot]. You can't inject [not-flash] 2-drops into the DRS slot to fix this problem - particularly when Street Wraith can't flip Delver, nor can it tell you how to play anything but predictably linear lines (it's a highly suspect Probe replacement).

    There are three ways to change:
    -drop Delver and play a worse version of UWx Blade/Shardless/Czech/Grixis "control"/4c Wrenn (these are all the same deck). The key to being successful with the black-using value deck, is that you have SCM with Hymn
    -stop trying to make Shadow fit in the DRS slot with Wraith's linear life loss, and use those slots to do something more specialized at the 2cmc mark granting novel play patterns towards a Shadow plan (like Confidant*/Bitterblossom/Orzhov Charm-types or just basic land killers like Sinkhole/Trophy).
    -change nothing except cut down to 2 Gurmag and fill the slots with JVP/Arcanist/Last Hope/etc. such that you end up with ~18x lands +16x things [at most] that won't flip a Delver
    *Not the best idea with FoW & Gurmag

    In terms of individual cards:
    -JVP is mainly a Reanimator card; that said Shadow still has Swamp in it, so Massacre/Snuff Out can at least benefit from Yawg. Will wording. The real key to JVP outside Reanimator is a plan of mana denial into "I have a game plan which involves recasting said mana denial in such a way that I don't just lose to Basic supertype."
    -Arcanist is like Dark Confidant, except he's opposed to how Shadow has to win games [creature damage]. An opponent is pretty free to ignore him as the Shadow player has either sabotaged Delver (too many non-flippers, thus unable to pressure adequately before the Snapcaster + PW phase of the game) or diluted their deck with red cards to the point that it's now "legacy cards I own, without Snapcaster" (in which case you kill Arcanist). Arcanist also ramps up just how badly Shadow loses to Chalice.

    There is precious little evidence support Shadow as having enough play to stand alone without Delver, because stepping back from the early game means we have to directly compare Shadow to Snapcaster. It's not JVP vs Delver, it's "do I have a plan to play JVP alongside Delver with cuts to Gurmag [and/or Wraith] slots?" If the answer to cutting back on Gurmag is 'yes,' you weigh land destruction/JVP builds vs yard-independent Last Hope (or other 3cmc walker).

    Edit: all opponents really need to do against Delver decks is kill ~12 dudes (in a very long game) to not die. It is unlikely that anything will change how bad this deck is vs StP, but investigating the viability of Hogaak-casting strategies are likely the highest yield area of improvement for this deck at this time. This strategy would favor Bitterblossom, but would likely require cards to handle Wrenn/Plague Engineer.

    The strategy of dumping threat numbers, such that opponents only need to kill ~8 non-evasive dudes total, is a losing strategy against not-combo.

  18. #118

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Edit: all opponents really need to do against Delver decks is kill ~12 dudes (in a very long game) to not die.
    This has been true for the majority of Delver decks over the years, but still Uxy Tempo has always been a tier 1 strategy for the last 20 years or so. And it has never been as easy as it seems to kill those 12 dudes and win the game that easily. That's why Tempo decks play their Dazes, Wastelands and Forces and they do a pretty good job at making sure your 12 creatures go the distance.

    I still prefer UB Shadow as a variation of that Tempo shell that has always worked in Legacy. 6 Duals, 8 Fetches, 4 wastelands, 12 creatures, 4 Force/Brainstorm/Daze/Ponder, 4 creature removal spells and a bunch of extra interaction to fill the last 10. That's what the original Shadow list was and is. Everything else is, as I said, a different deck with a different gameplan. And that different deck is one I personally don't like as much, because I think that 3/4-colored strategies with higher-powered cards are better at playing the non-pure-tempo fair game in Legacy.

    Miracles is likely the deck's worst matchup and other Plow matchups are also hard, though UW Stoneblade and UW Delver are still perfectly winnable because of how much better Daze and removal spells are against them than against Miracles. Not overextending your Shadows when they could have Plows should be a no-brainer anyway (never having 2 in play and never having one in play alongside something that would get you above 13 when Plowed whenever possible).

  19. #119

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    There's a lot of things being mashed up. The main issue with this deck is that Delver has been stranded by itself as a 1cmc (turn 1) threat b/c DRS got banned, and there are precisely zero 1cmc black creatures to fill that void (because this deck isn't called Zombardment - the one exception to this black 1cmc vacuum). JVP/Arcanist/Gurmag won't ever fix this structural instability.
    Ok

    The set slots are 4x Delver + 4x DRS analogue [does not exist] + 4x Shadow [i.e. UB's Goyf]. Being a Delver deck caps you at 15-16 creatures, and you're putting basically all those remaining slots into Gurmag [the TNN-payoff slot]. You can't inject [not-flash] 2-drops into the DRS slot to fix this problem - particularly when Street Wraith can't flip Delver, nor can it tell you how to play anything but predictably linear lines (it's a highly suspect Probe replacement).
    Ok, although I think you are putting slightly too much emphasis on this anti-wraith idea

    There are three ways to change:
    -drop Delver and play a worse version of UWx Blade/Shardless/Czech/Grixis "control"/4c Wrenn (these are all the same deck). The key to being successful with the black-using value deck, is that you have SCM with Hymn
    -stop trying to make Shadow fit in the DRS slot with Wraith's linear life loss, and use those slots to do something more specialized at the 2cmc mark granting novel play patterns towards a Shadow plan (like Confidant*/Bitterblossom/Orzhov Charm-types or just basic land killers like Sinkhole/Trophy).
    -change nothing except cut down to 2 Gurmag and fill the slots with JVP/Arcanist/Last Hope/etc. such that you end up with ~18x lands +16x things [at most] that won't flip a Delver
    *Not the best idea with FoW & Gurmag
    - You need an argument for why cutting delver from UB leads to a "worse" midrange deck. Why must the key to being successful not be JVP+Hymn
    - Again you have this weird thought that Wraith is bad because it only does 1 thing. Wraith is either good or bad based on the metagame dictating how much damage you want to be doing to yourself. Arguing that it's bad because it's not "specialised" is nonsense when the card has no function except to instantly replace itself.
    - Yeah I don't think it makes sense to play Delver + Shadow + Angler + extra creatures which is what you seem to also be saying in this third point

    In terms of individual cards:
    -JVP is mainly a Reanimator card; that said Shadow still has Swamp in it, so Massacre/Snuff Out can at least benefit from Yawg. Will wording. The real key to JVP outside Reanimator is a plan of mana denial into "I have a game plan which involves recasting said mana denial in such a way that I don't just lose to Basic supertype."
    -Arcanist is like Dark Confidant, except he's opposed to how Shadow has to win games [creature damage]. An opponent is pretty free to ignore him as the Shadow player has either sabotaged Delver (too many non-flippers, thus unable to pressure adequately before the Snapcaster + PW phase of the game) or diluted their deck with red cards to the point that it's now "legacy cards I own, without Snapcaster" (in which case you kill Arcanist). Arcanist also ramps up just how badly Shadow loses to Chalice.
    - Yes, agreed with first point. Hymn to Tourach plays this role because starving your opponent out of resources (cards in hand) is functional manadenial, invariant to whether the opponent is playing basics or not
    - I don't think an opponent would ever realistically ignore an Arcanist and this second point doesn't make much sense to me (except the chalice thing, which is valid but marginal)

    There is precious little evidence support Shadow as having enough play to stand alone without Delver, because stepping back from the early game means we have to directly compare Shadow to Snapcaster. It's not JVP vs Delver, it's "do I have a plan to play JVP alongside Delver with cuts to Gurmag [and/or Wraith] slots?" If the answer to cutting back on Gurmag is 'yes,' you weigh land destruction/JVP builds vs yard-independent Last Hope (or other 3cmc walker).
    This is wrong, again you assert that playing Shadow without Delver is bad with no argument

    Edit: all opponents really need to do against Delver decks is kill ~12 dudes (in a very long game) to not die. It is unlikely that anything will change how bad this deck is vs StP, but investigating the viability of Hogaak-casting strategies are likely the highest yield area of improvement for this deck at this time. This strategy would favor Bitterblossom, but would likely require cards to handle Wrenn/Plague Engineer.

    The strategy of dumping threat numbers, such that opponents only need to kill ~8 non-evasive dudes total, is a losing strategy against not-combo.
    Izor already explained why this is mostly baloney.
    The idea of playing Hogaak in a xerox deck is amusing and I don't want to write it off immediately but you would need such a huge overhaul of the deck to reliably enable convoke I don't think it's likely you would end up with something that's better than either the Depths build or the full-graveyard dredge/altar versions.

    Miracles is likely the deck's worst matchup and other Plow matchups are also hard, though UW Stoneblade and UW Delver are still perfectly winnable because of how much better Daze and removal spells are against them than against Miracles. Not overextending your Shadows when they could have Plows should be a no-brainer anyway (never having 2 in play and never having one in play alongside something that would get you above 13 when Plowed whenever possible).
    With the JVP version I feel favoured vs Miracles and Blade.
    The worst matchups are DNT, Lands, and Stompy/Prison decks
    Basically the anti-delver decks become much better against you but the fair blue matchups become more favoured for Shadow, and the combo matchup is roughly the same.
    I have no idea whether the deck is still good or not (haven't tried it much post-WAR) because not being able to play Wrenn seems like such a huge drawback and there are some other tools that decks have got (e.g. Arcanist, Veil of Summer).
    The deck can take advantage of Force of Negation and Plague Engineer though, which is something

  20. #120
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2015
    Location

    PDX
    Posts

    2,477

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    @kombatkiwi
    Every time you reach for Hymn, you reach for Snapcaster, meaning you play Czech Pile/Grixis Control/4c Wrenn b/c these decks just win more games. Solo-Hymn has never been an effective strategy with staying power - so even if you run JVP, you shouldn't be doing it. Here's the no-SCM Hymn peer group: Pox, Jund, BUG Delver. Shardless & occasional Aluren/Food Chain are too high on the mana curve for a comparison, and furthermore [non-Aluren] Shardless Agent is an obsolete Snapcaster (the only thing that ever made Shardless BUG playable was how SDT/CB warped the format in its favor, making cascade towards Decay a reasonable play).

    Solo-Hymn doesn't work, and cutting Delvers for JVP (or SCM) + Hymn turns you into a less-winning Grixis Control deck. The problem of Shadow/Angler getting trounced by kill spell + SCM (especially bad if StP) has always been the problem. While it's not exactly effective to use Delver to duress StP from hand, it's better than sitting around in an aggressive deck with zero reach trying to Hymn those spells from hand while they develop ever more unassailable mana (thanks to cards like Vista/Astrolabe/Wrenn) towards PWs taking over the game. Daze and Wasteland are getting worse in real time, and playing solo-Hymn just makes those two cards worse...You cut the Delvers [the only aggressive opener this deck has left] on top of this and it's over, you're in build-order loss territory b/c you've butchered any chance of Daze ever helping you.

    WotC made 3-4 color mana bases trivial, so to have a shot with a Daze deck you really need to have a focused gameplan. Stranding Delver by itself and looking for answers at 2cmc (which are opposed to creating a low-to-the-ground pro-Delver gamestate) means that the moment you consider it you're generally making a "cards I own" pile. These piles not only win less than value pile vs the field, they also lose badly to value pile. The days of pretending you've got a good matchup vs greedy value piles and Tundra decks are over - Wasteland stealing the game was the only way that ever worked out, and this just won't happen anymore.

    In any 2c/3c shell a not-combo deck needs cards playing off each-other. Random 2-for-1's that don't do anything to synergize & advance a gameplan and fail to deal with on-board problems aren't effective, b/c everyone else is playing that same style with SCM on top of it all. You don't even need to look at how bad Shadow is vs real Delver decks (Delver + Bolt) to realize that Hymn is the wrong card.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)