I thought my comment implied that.
For the 5 cards you can pick say 2x Fow and 2x discard spell 1x land, then exile the rest of their library and graveyard and leave them with 0 cards. Not only will they lose the game with 0 library, but in case they had any tricks in hand you just tutored up discard spells to cast and free FoWs. It's hilarious overkill.
I mean, that line is all well and good, but you'd still lose if they have Cavern in play and Oracle in hand, all the Discard spells and Forces won't help you there.
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
White Court
'
Black Court
Just want to make a Court/Confinement deck:
Turn 1 - Land - Cantrip
Turn 2 - Land - Enlightened Tutor + cantrip
Turn 3 - Land - Confinement + FOW + Blue card for FOW
Turn 4 - Land - discard a card to confinement - Any Court that lets you win the game (White/Black/Blue all work)
The black and white courts are quite strong. Enchantments are tough to deal with.
Court of Grace especially seems fantastic. It works amazingly in an Armageddon Stax or Angel Stompy type deck.
Just wondering if that strategy could potentially make a comeback.
Can Emeria's Call be discarded to Mox Diamond?
Chalice, Trini and Armageddon/Ravages/Cataclysm, Wasteland+Crucible, Ghostly Prison, Flagstones, Tabernacle, Karakas are all still amazing cards. Cataclysms ability to boardwipe all planeswalkers makes it better than ever imo.
They couldn't just let Kobolds of Kher Keep stay strictly better than his friends...
Two cards coming out that might just be some of my ask time favorites.
Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith
2R
Legendary Creature - Goblin Artificer
When a land enters the battlefield under your control, create an artifact equipment token named "rock". It has "Equipped creature has "1, Sacrifice Rock: deal 2 damage to any target" and "Equip 1." "
Partner
And
Not really relevant to legacy, is it?
The new draw 7 seems more interesting:
https://scryfall.com/card/cmr/211/wheel-of-misfortune
2R Sorcery
Each player secretly chooses a number. Then reveal those numbers. “Wheel of Misfortune” deals damage equal to the greatest number chosen to the players that chose it. Then each player who didn’t choose the minimum number discards their hand, and draws 7 cards.
I hope the quotation marks aren't a typo and the creature really gains Equip 1.
The Lotus fills a role LED already could, except now without discarding your hand. Seems very good with Sharuum the Hegemon (and all Commanders really).
Read it again
It has "Equipped creature has "1, Sacrifice Rock: deal 2 damage to any target" and "Equip 1." "
Look at where the quotation marks are
"Equipped creature has "Ability 1" and "Ability 2" "
There's obviously a typo there, as there should be a 2nd end quote after Ability 1. As written, it grants both abilities to the creature.
Create thing called rock. It [rock] has "something" and "something." Note how and is not included in the quotation marks.
It has "Equipped creature has "1, Sacrifice Rock: deal 2 damage to any target" and "Equip 1." "
would mean the creature has equip.
--> It has "Equipped creature has "1, Sacrifice Rock: deal 2 damage to any target"" and "Equip 1."
is likely the correct version - less fun.
That's not what it says though. There's a second set of quotation marks including the word and.
It [rock] has "Equipped creature has "something" and "something" ".
dte explained it well. It's clearly meant to be the 2nd version, but the 1st version is more fun! Equip creature to rock, go.
Edit: Equip Hopeful Eidolon to 3 Benalish Heros banded together. "Judge", go.
At least in English you need to have a known noun/subject before referring to it as an "it." You hit the word "it" and you have to go back in time to find what is being replaced/alluded to.
So we read the card and come to "It has" - this is technically a complete sentence by itself. Ignore everything that comes after this point, we already have a subject [pronoun] and a verb. Before we continue we must be able to define what "it" refers to. This is only ever retrospective in English grammatical rules.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)