Quote Originally Posted by zulander View Post
I'm interested in the banned list, I'm not interested in an article regarding the banned list.
It's prohibitively difficult to prove something is NOT broken but easy to prove it is broken. For example, I'm sure I could have come up with initial drafts of Long.dec that weren't good enough to get LED restricted. It really takes a lot of effort to break most cards. A lot of decks are successful only with a lot of tuning. Back in the days of Goblin Sligh, would you have said that Lackey was banworthy? Certainly not. Now in the days of Vial Goblins would you? It's more debatable.

Plus, it's not a good topic for an article. Most people have an opinion one way or another and are unlikely to change. These sorts of articles are more intended to convince WotC R&D, so why not just summarize your points saliently and e-mail them?