This is an article I found on Wizards today, written by 2 level 5 judges, which outlines the hows and whys of Judging, from the judge's perspective. With all the arguments people get into here about rulings, I figured this would be the best place to post it. Give it a read, it's really good.
Team Info-Ninjas: Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
My Videos: Chiron Beta Prime, Flickr, Re: Your Brains
Originally Posted by Slay
Understand the Philosophy of PG Section 51 also went up, and it's much more useful. Not bad for a Scott Marshall piece.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
Ugh, why do people insist on using "philosophy" as a buzzword for "belief" or "reason/ing"? Definitely one of my pet peeves. Besides, I thought there would actually be a link between philosophy and Magic that would be expounded in the article.
Putting that horrible misuse of a word aside, the articles are indeed fairly informative; thanks for pointing them out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)