Page 197 of 279 FirstFirst ... 97147187193194195196197198199200201207247 ... LastLast
Results 3,921 to 3,940 of 5564

Thread: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

  1. #3921

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Paiter - stone combo is not as good as thopter here. Thopter relies on artifacts and no creatures. On the other side i see a mistaken conception here, to include a combo is not playing a combo deck. So if there's krosan...what?? They side it in for crash humility, CB on so on. And needle, extirptate, are all the common hate we are used to. The combo does not inpairs the ability of winning of the deck. For the contrary it makes it more aggresive.

  2. #3922
    Just some dude.
    Mark Sun's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Akron, Ohio, USA
    Posts

    824

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by ultimoman View Post
    What does everyone think about this list:

    http://www.deckcheck.net/deck.php?id=34525

    It uses Isochron in the main, and Descendant of Kiyomaro and Disk in the side. Interesting choices, but I'm not sure I'm sold on Isochron (at least not 3 of them). Theres just too much hate for it these days, even in game 1.
    Actually I believe Joel (mossivo1986) and I discussed on the phone some of his early iterations of Landstill, and Descendant was one of the choices. My friend played against that guy at Indy, btw, seems fine but commented after that the guy sided out the Isochron's in g2 and g3 because of his Pridemages, etc. I mean, is it really worth it for potential 2-for-1's?
    Last edited by Mark Sun; 04-15-2010 at 12:09 AM.
    Delver enthusiast and avid practitioner of blind flipsmanship.

    Follow me on Twitter: @AllSunsDawn

  3. #3923
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    Gent / Flanders
    Posts

    109

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I think descendant is a very interesting SB choice in general for landstill although I prefer kitchen finks for now because the life gain is not conditional (minor point) and finks is very useful as a blocker against both gobs and merfolk.
    I tested a version of landstill with scepter a while back and the fact that you can get 2-for-1'd quite often wat too detrimental. It reminds me of the article 'the danger of cool things'.


    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    Paiter - stone combo is not as good as thopter here. Thopter relies on artifacts and no creatures. On the other side i see a mistaken conception here, to include a combo is not playing a combo deck. So if there's krosan...what?? They side it in for crash humility, CB on so on. And needle, extirptate, are all the common hate we are used to. The combo does not inpairs the ability of winning of the deck. For the contrary it makes it more aggresive.
    Why do you want the deck to be more aggresive? And when in the game? Do you feel that even if you get into the mid/late game you are still losing too much games? What matchups do you seek to improve by using thopter/sword?

    Personally I don't want to be dependant on any enchantments/artifacts. There is too much hate for it and I would be rather casting spells that are good all the time (wrath, decree,...) instead of enchantments/artifacts that make you either VERY dependent on them (humility) or require you to invest too much sources (counter/top, thopter/sword). And in the case of thopter/sword it's even worse since you need to have both to have a reasonable effect for your investment.
    As a last point. I want my opponents to board badly against me. I noticed a while back that even though I had no enchantments/artifacts played in game 1. 95% of my opponents boarded grip or something similar against me game 2 because they are expecting enchantments. I prefer those slots to be dead for them. Quite a few of my opponents also board gy hate against me. Which is fine again, because in my list I only run 1 solitary E. Dragon. It is a strength of my deck that graveyard hatred, enchantment/artifact hatred and creature removal are all very situational against me and thus leaves them with quite some useless cards against my deck. In your case you are hoping to overwhelm them with artifacts/enchantments but I doubt this is a very consistent strategy.
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what's for lunch.

  4. #3924

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Once more...we are not dependant on we are complemented with.
    In my experience what i've seen with thopterstill is that we have de agresiveness of a strong synergy with the heavy protection typical of landstill.
    Yeah, maybe we loose son recurses compare with traditional landstill in form of wishes but with edict, the lifegaining of the combo and the tutors to o-ring and explosives to regulate artifacts and enchants we have a good deck here. I'm not seeing better or worse than the classic but a good deck for sure.

  5. #3925
    Just some dude.
    Mark Sun's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Akron, Ohio, USA
    Posts

    824

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Reagens View Post
    because in my list I only run 1 solitary E. Dragon.
    I am all of the sudden really interested

    Care to elaborate?

    I've honestly considered testing Thopter/Sword combo in Landstill (bonus - DoJ tokens + Sword = profit?), to see if there is any merit from running it, just haven't had time. Haven't played this deck since the end of last month, though.
    Delver enthusiast and avid practitioner of blind flipsmanship.

    Follow me on Twitter: @AllSunsDawn

  6. #3926

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Morbid- View Post
    I am all of the sudden really interested

    Care to elaborate?

    I've honestly considered testing Thopter/Sword combo in Landstill (bonus - DoJ tokens + Sword = profit?), to see if there is any merit from running it, just haven't had time. Haven't played this deck since the end of last month, though.
    Tested both versions (but no thopter together DoJ). And both has it's streghts and weakness.
    Thopter: if you set the combo, you can gain much life and time to get sources or just win. So we have 3 form to win: Elspeth, thopter and mishra's. However, the introduction of meek thopter cost the removal of some nice sources such as, crucile, DoJ and explosives. This leds to a diminised ability to deal with permanents.

    Classical: For me the advantage of this version is that we have a big deal of recourses to manage permanents. In contrast it's slower than thopter version.

    For references and comments i post my two versions:

    Thopterstill


    / Lands
    4 [ON] Flooded Strand
    1 [A] Underground Sea
    2 [R] Tundra
    4 [AQ] Mishra's Factory (2)
    3 [5E] Plains (1)
    2 [U] Swamp (3)
    3 [U] Island (2)
    2 [ON] Polluted Delta
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins

    // Spells
    4 [IA] Swords to Plowshares
    1 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    2 [ALA] Elspeth, Knight-Errant
    3 [OD] Standstill
    1 [ALA] Oblivion Ring
    2 [6E] Enlightened Tutor
    2 [TE] Diabolic Edict
    2 [ARB] Thopter Foundry
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    3 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
    3 [CS] Counterbalance
    3 [DIS] Spell Snare
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    1 [TE] Humility
    1 [FUT] Sword of the Meek
    2 [6E] Wrath of God

    // Sideboard
    SB: 2 [ALA] Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 1 [TSB] Tormod's Crypt
    SB: 2 [TE] Perish
    SB: 3 [8E] Circle of Protection: Red
    SB: 1 [SOK] Pithing Needle
    SB: 3 [ARB] Meddling Mage
    SB: 3 [TE] Propaganda


    Classical

    // Lands
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
    4 [ON] Flooded Strand
    2 [R] Tundra
    4 [AQ] Mishra's Factory (4)
    2 [TE] Wasteland
    2 [RAV] Island (1)
    3 [CS] Snow-Covered Plains
    3 [ON] Polluted Delta
    1 [ZEN] Swamp (4)
    1 [R] Underground Sea
    1 [DK] Maze of Ith

    // Spells
    2 [ALA] Elspeth, Knight-Errant
    3 [OD] Standstill
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    3 [DIS] Spell Snare
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    1 [TE] Humility
    2 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    4 [4E] Swords to Plowshares
    2 [6E] Wrath of God
    1 [FD] Crucible of Worlds
    1 [SC] Decree of Justice
    3 [JU] Cunning Wish
    3 [IN] Fact or Fiction
    3 [MM] Counterspell

    // Sideboard
    SB: 2 [ALA] Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 3 [FNM] Circle of Protection: Red
    SB: 1 [TSB] Tormod's Crypt
    SB: 1 [PLC] Extirpate
    SB: 1 [DS] Pulse of the Fields
    SB: 1 [DS] Echoing Truth
    SB: 3 [M10] Pithing Needle
    SB: 1 [BD] Diabolic Edict
    SB: 1 [TSP] Return to Dust
    SB: 1 [M10] Doom Blade

  7. #3927
    just wants to cuddle
    rsaunder's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Geneseo NY
    Posts

    494

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    This seems terrible: like it weakens the core of the deck while providing a clock not much faster than elspeth. Does anyone have any numbers or results to back this up at all or is this just "on paper speculation?"
    I'm here to kick ass and play card games.

    BZK

  8. #3928
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2010
    Location

    Victoria, BC
    Posts

    8

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    However, the introduction of meek thopter cost the removal of some nice sources such as, crucile, DoJ and explosives. This leds to a diminised ability to deal with permanents.
    I couldn't afford to cut Explosives, albeit you do run tutors. It just feels like the deck is getting watered down...perhaps akin to what rsaunder is getting at re: "weakens the core of the deck". An explosives @1 from the opening hand can be game breaking.

  9. #3929
    Member
    RogueMTG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Central NY
    Posts

    290

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by rsaunder View Post
    This seems terrible: like it weakens the core of the deck while providing a clock not much faster than elspeth. Does anyone have any numbers or results to back this up at all or is this just "on paper speculation?"
    I've toyed with the idea, but in the end gave up on it. It doesn't really help solve any of Landstill's problem matchups.

  10. #3930

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    So...discard thopterstill?
    What do you think on my classical list?? I'll add a jace the mindsculptor, what owuld you cut for him???

    And do you think it's worthly cut a MoI for a 3rd EE and playing with 23 lands??
    Last edited by GoldenCid; 04-20-2010 at 12:09 PM.

  11. #3931
    Member
    RogueMTG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Central NY
    Posts

    290

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    So...discard thopterstill?
    What do you think on my classical list?? I'll add a jace the mindsculptor, what owuld you cut for him???
    I've dropped Fact or Fiction for Jace. He's just so much more versatile. He can affect the board, gives you CA without giving your opponent any information, and is a maindeck out to Iona on white.

    I used to say I didn't want to play Jace because if I was spending 4 mana on my own turn I should be winning the game. After actually testing him, Jace meets that requirement.

  12. #3932

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I'll run 1 jace plus 2 fof plus 3 CW...i think that's versatile!

    2 FoF or 2 SDT??

    And-...does it worth cut a MoI for a 3rd EE and play with 23 lands??

    Remember that i'd run:

    2 Elspeth
    1 Jace
    2 Wrath
    1 Humility
    2 FoF
    Last edited by GoldenCid; 04-20-2010 at 12:21 PM.

  13. #3933
    just wants to cuddle
    rsaunder's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Geneseo NY
    Posts

    494

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenCid View Post
    I'll run 1 jace plus 2 fof plus 3 CW...i think that's versatile!

    2 FoF or 2 SDT??
    How many 4cc's are you running? I'm running SDT's to smooth out my curve and draws: they fulfill similar roles late game but very different roles early game (FoF pitches to force and SDT does something relevant).

    And agreed 100% with Rouge on Jace 2.0. He's amazing.
    I'm here to kick ass and play card games.

    BZK

  14. #3934

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I edited my post

  15. #3935
    just wants to cuddle
    rsaunder's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Geneseo NY
    Posts

    494

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    6 4cc spells is honestly a tad... low. You can certainly get away with running FoF.
    I'm here to kick ass and play card games.

    BZK

  16. #3936

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    sO...you recommend fof o sdt??

  17. #3937
    just wants to cuddle
    rsaunder's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Geneseo NY
    Posts

    494

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I run SDT, but I also run quite a few more planeswalkers than you do, and need the early game filtering.
    I'm here to kick ass and play card games.

    BZK

  18. #3938
    Member
    Felidae's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Germany, NRW
    Posts

    168

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Has Maze of Ith added any decent feature to the deck without a way to tutor it up (like Tolaria West)?
    My current list looks somehow like your current build with some minor tweaks:

    3x Flooded
    1x Marsh Flats
    2x Polluted Delta
    3x Tundra
    1x Scrubland
    1x Underground Sea
    2x Island
    2x Plains
    1x Swamp
    4x Mishras Factory
    2x Wasteland
    1x Academy Ruins

    4x Swords to Plowshare
    3x Path to Exile <- can be changed into Diabolic Edic if the meta is full of reanimator
    3x Engineered Explosiv
    1x Wrath of God

    4x Force of Will
    3x Spell Snare
    3x Counter Spell

    4x Brainstorm
    4x Standstill
    2x Fact or Fiction
    2x Cunning Wish

    2x Elspeth
    2x Decree of Justice

    SB:
    1x Pulse of the Fields
    1x Extirpate
    1x Curfew
    1x Path to Exile / Diabolic Edict
    1x Return to Dust/ DIsmantling Blow
    2x Faerie Macabre
    2x Relic of Progenitus
    1x Tormnond's Crypt
    1x Ravenous Trap
    3x Ethersworm Canonist
    1x Crucible of the Worlds

    I allways felt that 3 Wishes are to much, considering that you don't need your wishboard in every situation.
    Just like your list I tried to design the maindeck to beat any kind creature based decks with the ability trought my sideboard to change the deck to fight combo, reanimator or dredge.
    Any ideas how to improve the list ?

    Cheers
    Our music means nothing, except for what it means to
    you.

  19. #3939

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I'd add echoing truth in your wishboard, it helps to kill dredge's and belcher's tokens...and...1 additional wish should be fine.

  20. #3940
    Member
    RogueMTG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Central NY
    Posts

    290

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Felidae View Post
    Has Maze of Ith added any decent feature to the deck without a way to tutor it up (like Tolaria West)?
    ...
    No, Maze of Ith is bad in Landstill because you need your lands + landdrops to make mana really badly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)