Page 258 of 279 FirstFirst ... 158208248254255256257258259260261262268 ... LastLast
Results 5,141 to 5,160 of 5564

Thread: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

  1. #5141

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I have been thinking about working with the UW Landstill list from Vintage (with Emrakul, the Promised End) and adapting it to Legacy. My biggest concern is not being able to get to Emrakul in time. Has anyone played around with it at all?

  2. #5142
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Anybody still playing this style of deck?

    I've been tinkering around with this recently, it's seemed quite promising!
    I tried something similar with Mausoleum Wanderers, more Flash creatures (Spell Queller, 4 Snaps) and a Stoneforge package (Jitte, Batterskull, and Sword of Fire and Ice, with sideboard Manriki-Gusari and Sword of Feast and Famine). Your fair blue matchups tend to be even (Delver) to pretty favorable (Miracles), but other than Lands and D&T (which are about even) the nonblue matchups aren't t great, especially Eldrazi. The pieces all had a fair amount of tension, with Wanderer encouraging more Spirits, Sprite pushing you toward more Faeries, Stoneforge favoring more creatures, and Snapcaster Mage wanting more spells. Standstill was a later addition. Cutting the Stoneforge package for more spells made the deck operate more smoothly, but made your matchups more polarized because making your creatures not suck in combat is critical for beating Eldrazi and Tarmogoyf decks. Unfair decks, Infect in particular, were all great matchups.

    If I were rebuilding the deck I'd probably go back to 2 Snaps and add a Rattlechains or 2 and embrace being more of a Flash creature deck.

    As you might have guessed, I am very on board with the Crucibles.

  3. #5143
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I would imagine that Moat + Counterspell is a pretty solid plan versus Eldrazi, because I don't know that they play any way out of an Enchantment besides All is Dust and most lists can't even ping you with Endbringer, because they don't play it.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  4. #5144
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
    I would imagine that Moat + Counterspell is a pretty solid plan versus Eldrazi, because I don't know that they play any way out of an Enchantment besides All is Dust and most lists can't even ping you with Endbringer, because they don't play it.
    I was specifically referring to my list, sorry. Moat + Counterspell is obviously an excellent answer to Eldrazi.

  5. #5145
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by btm10 View Post
    I was specifically referring to my list, sorry. Moat + Counterspell is obviously an excellent answer to Eldrazi.
    Oh, oops, sorry, thought you were commenting on Dissection's list.

    Might need to try his list though, my Moats need to get out more...
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  6. #5146
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by LarsLeif View Post
    I play a BUG version of this deck quite frequently, to quite good finishes. I wrote about it in the UBx landstill thread.
    I've been lurking the thread actually and seen that you've been doing really well with it, I'll have to give yours a try soon too!

    Quote Originally Posted by btm10 View Post
    I tried something similar with Mausoleum Wanderers, more Flash creatures (Spell Queller, 4 Snaps) and a Stoneforge package (Jitte, Batterskull, and Sword of Fire and Ice, with sideboard Manriki-Gusari and Sword of Feast and Famine). Your fair blue matchups tend to be even (Delver) to pretty favorable (Miracles), but other than Lands and D&T (which are about even) the nonblue matchups aren't t great, especially Eldrazi. The pieces all had a fair amount of tension, with Wanderer encouraging more Spirits, Sprite pushing you toward more Faeries, Stoneforge favoring more creatures, and Snapcaster Mage wanting more spells. Standstill was a later addition. Cutting the Stoneforge package for more spells made the deck operate more smoothly, but made your matchups more polarized because making your creatures not suck in combat is critical for beating Eldrazi and Tarmogoyf decks. Unfair decks, Infect in particular, were all great matchups.

    If I were rebuilding the deck I'd probably go back to 2 Snaps and add a Rattlechains or 2 and embrace being more of a Flash creature deck.

    As you might have guessed, I am very on board with the Crucibles.
    Spirits is a neat idea, I like the sound of Rattlechains and Spell Queller especially. I'm not sure about Wanderer though as this deck is ultimately trying to get to the late game where it's pretty blank. Are there any more decent spirits that the deck could run along with Rattlechains and Queller? Otherwise I think playing Spellstutter and Clique is a bit better.

    The list did originally have SfM but I cut it as the curve wanted to be reactive in the early game and leans on moat for some matchups (Eldrazi and DnT mostly). There could almost be a third Moat in the 75, or a Verdict if there is a lot of Delver.

    Crucible has been wonderful in the deck so far, it's such a bomb in so many matchups.

    Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
    Oh, oops, sorry, thought you were commenting on Dissection's list.

    Might need to try his list though, my Moats need to get out more...
    Moat was the reason I started working on the list, it's in a pretty good spot right now!

    Unfortunately I don't actually own any myself so have been testing with proxies irl and have a friend play the deck. Such a sweet card too...maybe time to dump some more money on cards
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  7. #5147
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Moat was the reason I started working on the list, it's in a pretty good spot right now!

    Unfortunately I don't actually own any myself so have been testing with proxies irl and have a friend play the deck. Such a sweet card too...maybe time to dump some more money on cards
    I'm one of those "lucky" ones who bought them when they were cheap. Payed something like $50 a piece, sometime in 2008 or nine. While Team America was the Legacy deck I always wanted to build back then, White Stax was what I did. When someone here posted about Dutch Stax, when Elspeth was new, I ponied up the money and bought the Moats and Elspeths (even an English Ravages of War).

    I played BUG Landstill for a while in 2013 to combat TNN decks that were around then. Never did get a chance to play UW Landstill though. November is nearly Thanksgiving month for me though, so it will probably be a while until I can get to play this.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  8. #5148

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Not sure if this is the right thread for this, but it seems to fit best...
    So I've been messing around with a landstill list with a bit of english on it to reasonable success online (I'm too poor for MTGO, so I play on XMage).
    My basic list is built under the theory that Mishra's Factory is slow and shitty as a win condition, and the Dark Depths combo, while requiring two cards, can be played under a standstill and has significantly more power (and, to a degree, untility). It conveniently has a tutor for it that is on color and can also be played under a standstill in Tolaria West. The deck is primarily G/U, because green plays well with the lands combo, with a white splash for Knight of the Reliquary as a third tutor, general beatstick and utility piece, and Terminus, which is the best removal spell in the format. I'm running Force of Will for protection and Counterbalance because I firmly believe there's no reason to run counterspell if you're not playing counterbalances already. The primary tutor for the deck is Living Wish, giving us the versatility of post-side pre-side and acting as surgical insurance along with tutoring our win conditions, as well as allowing us to streamline the utility in the very demanding manabase that results. To help support Force of Will, the deck plays 64 cards, with the extra four slots over sixty being Gixtaxian Probes. Being relatively 'free' while increasing the blue count, helping the counterbalance curve, and letting you peak at your opponent's hand, the extra four over sixty seems to matter very little.

    //Lands
    1 Scalding Tarn
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Polluted Delta
    2 Flooded Strand
    2 Tropical Island
    1 Tundra
    1 Island
    3 Tolaria West
    2 Wasteland
    1 Ghost Quarter
    3 Thespian's Stage
    2 Dark Depths

    //Acceleration
    4 Mox Diamond
    3 Chrome Mox
    3 Exploration

    //Card Selection
    3 Sensei's Divining Top
    1 Sylvan Library
    4 Brainstorm
    2 Ponder
    4 Gitaxian Probe

    //Business
    2 Crucible of Worlds
    4 Living Wish
    2 Knight of the Reliquary
    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
    2 Standstill
    2 Terminus
    3 Force of Will
    3 Counterbalance

    //Sideboard
    SB: 1 Thespian's Stage
    SB: 1 Glacial Chasm
    SB: 1 Karakas
    SB: 1 Dark Depths
    SB: 1 Academy Ruins
    SB: 1 Wasteland
    SB: 1 The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale
    SB: 1 Containment Priest
    SB: 1 Phyrexian Revoker
    SB: 1 Reclamation Sage
    SB: 2 Engineered Explosives
    SB: 2 Terminus
    SB: 1 Force of Will

    That's the 75 I've mostly settled on. Some cards I didn't pick:

    Maze of Ith
    Kor Haven
    Bojuka Bog
    Sejiri Steppe
    Sanctum Prelate
    Gaddock Teeg
    Ethersworn Canonist
    Tyrgon Predator
    Crop Rotation
    Counterspell
    Stifle
    Stoneforge Mystic //(and sundry equipment)
    Life from the Loam

    Maze has been irrelevant in every matchup I've played it in; I've always wanted either Glacial Chasm or been dead anyway. It got cut for the Academy Ruins. Kor Haven is a more expensive version of the same.
    Bojuka Bog just doesn't do enough to hate on graveyards. Without Crop Rotation, it's strictly mediocre; Crop Rot wants it in the main anyway, and the card is just generally not good enough as a one-shot effect.
    Sejiri Steppe was in the main for a while in the fifth fetch spot. The fetch was better and the effect is suboptimal from the board (Especially at sorcery speed)
    Haven't tested prelate. Probably better than Teeg, which wasn't good enough to keep in the board. It, teeg and canonist all just seem too slow against storm, and not super effective anyway. Storm is built to beat these cards these days.
    Tyrgon Predator seems generally worse than Rec Sage by virtue of needing to connect first. I tried both and never fetched the predator over the sage, so predator got cut.
    Crop Rotation: This is the only card I'd actually like to put back in the main. It's incredibly powerful and makes the combo significantly quicker. I'm just not sure where to put it.
    I've already stated my thoughts on conterspell, and stifle falls in a similar category.
    Stoneforge takes up too many slots and doesn't seem to do enough for the deck to be worth it.
    Crucible is a better version of loam in this deck.

    The only real problem matchup so far has been BR reanimator, who's absurd speed and resiliency is absurd. The Academy Ruins and EE slots have floated through several different iterations, including bog, a pair of surgicals, and two more containment priest, all to fight this matchup. I generally believe that a broader suite is better, though, and subscribe to the "build a 75, not a 60 and a sideboard" theory of deckbuilding, though, so I'm trying the EE plan instead for a couple more percentage points in other matchups.

    Thoughts on the list? Any beautiful pieces of tech I'm just missing?

  9. #5149
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    Pottstown
    Posts

    21

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    This list is an esper list with a green splash. So I posted it in the BUGx landstill thread as well...

    Yesterday I won legacy at MVP games! Bringing home a Time Vault! Thanks Terrance Calvin Hodges and BMG for a kickass event. It was 25ish people!

    4c Landstill

    4 Deathrite Shaman
    2 Jace the Mind Sculptor
    1 Elspeth Knight Errant
    1 Snapcaster Mage

    4 Standstill
    1 Crucible of Worlds
    4 Brainstorm

    1 Engineered Explosives
    1 Pernicious Deed
    1 Toxic Deluge
    1 Supreme Verdict
    1 Abrupt Decay
    1 Dismember
    3 Swords to Plowshares

    4 Force of Will
    2 Counterspell
    2 Spell Pierce
    2 Spell Snare

    4 Flooded Strand
    3 Polluted Delta
    1 Marsh Flats
    1 Savannah
    1 Scrubland
    1 Tropical Island
    2 Tundra
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Swamp
    1 Island
    1 Plains
    3 Mishras Factory
    1 Creeping Tar Pit
    2 Wasteland

    SIDEBOARD
    2 Vendillion Clique
    3 Flusterstorm
    3 Surgical Extraction
    1 Containment Priest
    2 Abrupt Decay
    1 Swords to Plowshares
    1 Pithing Needle
    1 Gideon, Ally of Zendikar
    1 Wasteland

    Rd 1 0-2 delver
    Rd 2 2-1 belcher
    Rd 3 2-1 blade
    Rd 4 1-1-1 blade
    Rd 5 2-0 miracles

    T8 2-1 delver
    T4 2-0 storm
    Finals 2-0 miracles (beating a resolved back to basics and ruination in game 2)

    Today the cards were good. I needed to run this deck back after a great showing at champs with the list!

  10. #5150
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by landstillmaniac View Post
    Today the cards were good. I needed to run this deck back after a great showing at champs with the list!
    Awesome. I love the list. Might run it this week if I can make it to FNM.

    Do you ever feel it is difficult to close out games? When I played BUG Landstill, it was sometimes an issue.

    Also, any issues with running three basics? They are nice to have, but with so many disparate mana costs, I can imagine issues sometimes.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  11. #5151
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    That was actually the opposite thing I was thinking. I suspect (from very preliminary testing) that you can probably squeeze at least the second Island in, and maybe a basic Forest as well by messing with the dual/fetch mix. The attraction to Scrubland and especially Savannah seems to be that you can fetch them and have access to every color combination except UU on turn 2.

  12. #5152
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by btm10 View Post
    That was actually the opposite thing I was thinking. I suspect (from very preliminary testing) that you can probably squeeze at least the second Island in, and maybe a basic Forest as well by messing with the dual/fetch mix. The attraction to Scrubland and especially Savannah seems to be that you can fetch them and have access to every color combination except UU on turn 2.
    Well, the issue is that once you fetch a basic, you have already cut yourself off of one color mana and here it would appear you almost always need 3+ colors. It's difficult for me to articulate this in text, but the Basic Lands don't help you much in protecting from Wasteland in the grand scheme of things, because you'll always need a dual to be on double of a color, which is where most of your action is.

    If the deck didn't run Deathrite, it would seem more plausible to me, since then your turn one play would essentially be Land, Pass. But here, you want to drop that turn one Deathrite and so, if you are planning to play around Wasteland, you have to get Basic Swamp. As you said, now you are off UU turn 2, which is fine really, but lets say you want to cast Brainstorm. This is where I see issues, and it gets worse if you kept a hand two only 2 lands (obviously, not ideal, but on a mull to 6, you might just have to), because if you are going to keep playing around Wasteland (and you probably have to, on just two lands) then you have to get Island. Now you are cut off White and Green (although, whatever on Green really). If Deathrite dies, you are in the lurch really. Even if you topdeck another land, there is a fair chance it only taps for Colorless and now you are well behind.

    Bleh, I typed all that out and maybe I am conceptualizing it wrong here, since if you kept a two land hand, you will almost certainly lose to Wasteland anyway. I'm just dreading the idea of opening a hand like Plains, Swamp, Factory as the only lands. Or Swamp, Factory, Fetch which might even be worse if Deathrite isn't in it too. I think maybe my biggest issue is just Swamp itself, haha.
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  13. #5153
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I think we're both thinking (mostly) the same way, but we're evaluating the deficiencies of each approach differently. I definitely agree that more basics makes the deck worse against Wasteland in the early game as far as having all of its colors goes, but it also increases the stability of having Ux (or any three color combination) for turn 2. It may be that the manabase is optimized already or what we actually want is more fetches and fewer duals.

  14. #5154
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    Pottstown
    Posts

    21

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Basically this...

    Basics are there to fight Ruination and Back to Basics from miracles. The beautiful suite of duals, baiting lands in good order, and using Deathrite Shamans work great vs the wastelands.

    In the finals vs miracles, he resolved back to basics game 2, which I sat and did nothing for 3 turns until I found a land to Decay the b2b. Then late game he cast Ruination but I had Swamp, Island, and Deathrite in play. Next turn I played another land, and cast Gideon...he lost that game. The 3 basics are basically damage control vs cards/decks that have the haymaker (hate on non basic) cards.

  15. #5155
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Feb 2015
    Location

    Detroit, MI
    Posts

    370

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Why do you have the basic Plains? I'd consider Swamp, Forest, Island as more priority. Maybe just Swamp and Forest but I'd also include more AD in the main. Neat list! I have thought for some time that WUBG Landstill is a good option as StP solves the 1 mana removal problem that BUG tries to overcome with Innocent Blood and Disfigure.

  16. #5156
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    Pottstown
    Posts

    21

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Well in my opinion the Plains is better and here's why. This deck is basically Esper with a green splash. I started with a bug shell and I think straight bug is handicapping ones self because you lose stp as well as other good cards. The 4 Plowshares in the 75 as well as 3 white spells that cost double white lead me to play the Plains.

    The Forest would support Decay and not much else. The decays are mainly there to fight Miracles by killIngot counterbalance and b2b. Like Deathrite doesn't need a forest to be a good card, and I don't need Forest in most of the matches where Decay shines.

    Having a basic Plains allows me to fetch it up where Plains actually shines...but again the basics are more or less insurance vs the haymakers that hate on non basics. Hope this helps you understand my thoughts more :-P ...now if this was vintage, I'd absolutely want Forest to feed Nature's Claims and Decays because Workshop decks haha!

  17. #5157
    Hymn-Slinging Mod
    H's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    The U-easy-anna
    Posts

    3,413

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Quote Originally Posted by landstillmaniac View Post
    Well in my opinion the Plains is better and here's why. This deck is basically Esper with a green splash. I started with a bug shell and I think straight bug is handicapping ones self because you lose stp as well as other good cards. The 4 Plowshares in the 75 as well as 3 white spells that cost double white lead me to play the Plains.

    The Forest would support Decay and not much else. The decays are mainly there to fight Miracles by killIngot counterbalance and b2b. Like Deathrite doesn't need a forest to be a good card, and I don't need Forest in most of the matches where Decay shines.

    Having a basic Plains allows me to fetch it up where Plains actually shines...but again the basics are more or less insurance vs the haymakers that hate on non basics. Hope this helps you understand my thoughts more :-P ...now if this was vintage, I'd absolutely want Forest to feed Nature's Claims and Decays because Workshop decks haha!
    Indeed, I can see Island and Plains as making sense. Last thing you want versus a Delver deck, for example, is to be Wasted off being able to Cast Brainstorm or Swords. Swamp is a little shaky, being great to fetch for, but very weak in the starting hand. That's where my fear of too many basics comes from, being that we have 5 Colorless Lands in addition. Forest would definitely be even worse than Swamp, you answer to Blood Moon is just, first, hope they don't have it, second, have mana up to float then Decay, third, Force it, or fourth, EE for 3 (hopefully you'll have at least two Basics). You can't beat everything, so sometimes if they have the nuts, they have the nuts, .

    In the end though, with the Non-Basic hate that floats around, from Ruination, to From the Ashes to even Price of Progress, they probably are a necessity (even if they are going to flat out make some hands unkeepable). I'll try to give the list a run as is (although I don't own a Gideon, I'll just make a bad substitution, probably Garruk).
    "The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
    Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order

  18. #5158
    Brisbane Legacy regular
    pandaman's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Location

    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Posts

    675

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Bump to get UWb (Esper) landstill with Fatal Push discussion going. My list would be (very rough):

    3 Island
    2 Plains
    1 Swamp
    3 Tundra
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Scrubland
    4 Flooded Strand
    4 Polluted Delta
    3 Mishra's Factory
    1 Celestial Colonnade
    1 Creeping Tar Pit

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Standstill
    4 Force of Will
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    3 Fatal Push
    2 Supreme Verdict
    3 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
    2 Liliana of the Veil
    1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant
    1 Counterspell
    1 Council's Judgement
    3 Thoughtseize
    2 Spell Snare
    1 Snapcaster Mage

    Sideboard

    2 Vendilion Clique
    2 Flusterstorm
    1 Thoughtseize
    1 Snapcaster Mage
    1 Fatal Push
    2 Moat
    3 Surgical Extraction
    3x

    Excited that LandStill has got a great 1-mana removal spell to hopefully stage a comeback!

  19. #5159

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Ive actually just recently bought into this on mtgo. I also saw a vintage version and wanted to adapt it to legacy, not sure if its good or I'm just not the best at playing it. I also went with the promised end version as its an amazing top end with all this sultai stuff floating around. This is what I'm running http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/30-01-17-landstill/

  20. #5160

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    hi guys!
    here there the deck wich i used to win the italian legacy championship

    2 Spell Pierce
    2 Ponder
    2 Counterspell
    2 Spell Snare
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Force of Will
    4 Swords to Plowshares
    1 Arid Mesa
    3 Terminus
    3 Standstill
    2 Monastery Mentor
    2 Snapcaster Mage
    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
    2 Engineered Explosives
    4 Sensei's Divining Top
    2 Volcanic Island
    3 Scalding Tarn
    4 Island
    1 Plains
    3 Tundra
    4 Flooded Strand
    3 Mishra's Factory
    1 Faerie Conclave
    Sideboard:
    SB: 3 Pyroblast
    SB: 1 Red Elemental Blast
    SB: 1 Mountain
    SB: 2 Vendilion Clique
    SB: 2 Counterbalance
    SB: 1 Flusterstorm
    SB: 1 Surgical Extraction
    SB: 1 Disenchant
    SB: 1 Relic of Progenitus
    SB: 2 Containment Priest

    i've found those MU:

    T1 Shard 2-1
    T2 Bug midrange 2-0
    T3 Grixis delver 2-0
    T4 Bug control 1-1
    T5 uw Thopters he is a friend of mine and he concede because i was the only one with 4 win
    T6 easy ID

    top8
    Omishow ub 2-1
    Maverick 2-1
    Junk 2-0

    here there is a tournament video: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/122273829

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)