Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

  1. #1
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    First, this is not a cry to ban Tarmogoyf but a discussion on the limitations of Stax in dealing with said beasty (and other resolved threats) and a more general stax/stacker/Mud discussion.

    Personal Observations (these have opinions in them)
    1. For some time W-Stax has been having the most success primarily because it has Armageddon, Strong Creature Control Elements (WOG, Humility, Moat, Ghostly Prison, Magus of the Tabernacle, Oblivion Ring) and well suited win conditions that help it vs. tougher matchups (Exalted Angel, Elspeth, Magus)

    2. I have been testing with Metalworker and he is stone cold nuts. Emptying your hand of artifacts on the second or third turn is usually GG. Is this everyone else's experience?

    3. Traditional wisdom says you can't run welder with Chalice. I say why not. If I stick a chalice on 1 I'll have 4 dead cards and the odds are, my opponent will have somewhere between 12 and 20.

    4. Stax has traditionally had a hard time with resolved threats. Tarmogoyf in particular is difficult for the following reasons:
    A. He costs 2. This is important because:
    A.1 A common first turn play, CotV=1 doesn't stop him and it can take 1 turn too late to chalice =2.
    A.2 He is often bigger than the "fairly costed" artificat dudes Su-Chi, Juggernaut, etc.
    A.3 He is often too large for a reasonable direct damage spell to kill (earthquake?)
    A.4 Combined with Ancient Tomb damage a powder keg ramped up to 2 is often too slow
    Stax needs a cost effictive and quick solution to Tarmogoyf otherwise it is unviable.

    5. Since we now have metalworker Stax(esque) decks may have critical mass to make a larger impact on the metagame. Time will tell.

    6. Blue (TfK, Intuition, and maybe a Tezz), with perhaps a red splash for welder and bloodmoon may be the right direction. Unfortunately, while giving it what I feel is the most important aspect (more consistency) you lose most of the creature control.

    7. Given the relatively light and fetch/dual heavy manabases of most I feel declaring all out war against them, with some neutralizer for resolved threats is correct. Consider that we have the following synergistic cards:
    Tangle Wire
    Winter Orb
    Static Orb
    Smokestack
    3sphere
    Sphere of Resistance (I want to like this card but it hurts us too much)
    Thorn of Amethyst (I want to like this card but it may hurt us too much)
    Wasteland/Crucible/GHOST QUARTER?
    Propaganda/Pendrelle Mists (for creature control)
    BLOOD MOON?

    8. My only ideas to really deal with creatures in blue are Control Magic and Shackles and I think the island count would be too low for Shackles.


    How do you make stax viable in todays metagame?
    Last edited by jazzykat; 09-28-2009 at 05:44 AM. Reason: My point

  2. #2
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany, RLP, KO
    Posts

    445

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Unfortunately I fail to see your whole point / your question / your basis for discussion.
    Your points are rather plain statements.

    Are you asking for an answer for Tarmogoyf for Stax decks?
    Do you want to develop a Metalworker deck?
    Do you wonder what splash in Stax is better, R or U?
    Are you asking about the best spheres/orbs?

  3. #3
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Quote Originally Posted by sco0ter View Post
    Are you asking for an answer for Tarmogoyf for Stax decks?
    Do you want to develop a Metalworker deck?
    Do you wonder what splash in Stax is better, R or U?
    Are you asking about the best spheres/orbs?
    Yes. But more generally I'm asking how do we win with Stax in todays metagame? My points were simply a way to get people thinking about what I see are the most important aspects of Stax at this point.

  4. #4

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzykat View Post
    Yes. But more generally I'm asking how do we win with Stax in todays metagame?
    I'm pretty sure you don't.

    The problem with Stax is that the deck is full of cards that you only want to play once. You play one Trinisphere, and all your other Trinispheres are dead. You play a Chalice at one, and the only other reasonable play you can make with Chalice is Chalice at two, and then Chalice is dead. Getting a second Smokestack is kinda shitty unless you want to sacrifice the first one to itself. And so on. This problem is compounded by the weak draw options the deck has available to it. Even in blue, you generally have very little control over your topdecks, making it difficult to end the game if you hit a pocket of lands or redundant lock pieces.

    Another major problem is that these lock pieces require the deck to be built around them, but also take up a ton of slots in doing so. Counterbalance takes up exactly eight slots and does a lot of what Stax does, except it can be backed up by a reasonable clock and Force. Stax has...what, Tezzeret? Oh noes.

    Basically, all of these factors combine to make Stax an historical curiosity in the same vein as Rifter. Even with Metalworker to shit your hand all over the board, you're still not capable of ending the game in a reasonable time frame. The deck doesn't need more mana, it needs a better win condition and to not suck.

  5. #5
    Stay frosty.
    lorddotm's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    New York City
    Posts

    883

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Quote Originally Posted by Aggro_zombies View Post
    I'm pretty sure you don't.

    The problem with Stax is that the deck is full of cards that you only want to play once. You play one Trinisphere, and all your other Trinispheres are dead. You play a Chalice at one, and the only other reasonable play you can make with Chalice is Chalice at two, and then Chalice is dead. Getting a second Smokestack is kinda shitty unless you want to sacrifice the first one to itself. And so on. This problem is compounded by the weak draw options the deck has available to it. Even in blue, you generally have very little control over your topdecks, making it difficult to end the game if you hit a pocket of lands or redundant lock pieces.

    Another major problem is that these lock pieces require the deck to be built around them, but also take up a ton of slots in doing so. Counterbalance takes up exactly eight slots and does a lot of what Stax does, except it can be backed up by a reasonable clock and Force. Stax has...what, Tezzeret? Oh noes.

    Basically, all of these factors combine to make Stax an historical curiosity in the same vein as Rifter. Even with Metalworker to shit your hand all over the board, you're still not capable of ending the game in a reasonable time frame. The deck doesn't need more mana, it needs a better win condition and to not suck.
    How about that new Smokestacks Creature from Zendikar?
    Quote Originally Posted by Zach Tartell View Post
    Have to ask one of those West coasters about recreational purposes.
    Quote Originally Posted by DownSyndromeKarl View Post
    A baby seal walks into a club.
    West Coast Legacy

  6. #6
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    What smokestack creature?

  7. #7
    The Courage Wolf
    chokin's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Tucson, AZ
    Posts

    267

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    First of all, I don't claim that any of these are the best, but I'm tossing ideas out there.

    Maze of Ith. Eats a land drop, but is essentially a Pacifism on any non-shroud beater. One of our players runs 3 in the maindeck.

    Ensnaring Bridge helps since you can drop your hand fairly quickly. Coupled with Bottled Cloister, it's a soft lock and a draw engine.

    Duplicant. A little slow without Metalworker, but a permanent solution to a resolved beater.

    Karn. Blocks Goyf all day.

  8. #8
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany, RLP, KO
    Posts

    445

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Quote Originally Posted by jazzykat View Post
    What smokestack creature?
    World Queller

  9. #9
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Aggro Zombies brings up a good point about how some things in multiples aren't desirable. Maybe we should play a few less 4 ofs of something that once you have 1 you can't do anything with a second except as a spare and another permanent on the board (i.e. 3sphere)?

  10. #10
    Legacy Staple
    Piceli89's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2008
    Location

    Citizen of the world.
    Posts

    764

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Why not to circumvent the problem playing Maze of Ith as 2-ofs maindeck, in MUD? Your deck should be able to support it since it produces a lots of mana that allows to avoid the non-mana producing liability; plus it also allows you to slow down tha game a bit in order to develop your explosive metalworker-plays.
    I'm working on a brown-only MUDesque build in Legacy, and i can say Tarmogoyf isn't all that problem, when you're running stuff like Ensnaring Bridge maindeck too. Since it tends to grow a lot bigger due to the presence of Land, Instants and Artifacts, it'll be likely to be stopped fom attacking you. And whoever plays artifact removal g1 ?
    Post g2, I'd suggest to take a look to Silent Arbiter, too. the *5 ass is good against that kind of fatty.

    Still, it's unlikely to lose from a Tarmogoyf,say played by a Canadian Threshold, when your deck can a)lock them out of their mana (Tangle wire), b) kill their board (Smokestack), c) have recurring infinite blockers (crucible+manlands), d)destrot their manabase (crucible-waste lock), e) cut out their cantrip engine, their bolts, half their finishers, sometimes even on turn 1 (chalice@1), f) have mass-removal to clean the board after a safe chalice or trini to avoid Stifle (Kegs).

    If you're telling the Tarmogoyf trouble coming from more controllish decks (Rock or Aggro Loam), then it'a different matter. But still, you could manage to handle down those decks in running solid sb solutions to slow them a lot (I'm thinking to Winter Orb/Orb of Dreams to delay their Deeds/DDreams).
    Quote Originally Posted by Pastorofmuppets View Post
    you just want us to do that because of your Silences, you sly dog.
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Avatar of kicks_422's creation and property

  11. #11
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    So far Maze seems like a very good idea, especially coupled with crucible and mox diamond. It lets you play almost the same amount of land ~24 as before. So many go up by 1 mana to 25 and put 2 or 3 mazes...?

  12. #12
    I'm so meta, even this acronym
    Infinitium's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Posts

    585

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Artifact Stompy builds in general and builds splashing blue for Master of Etherium in particular shouldn't have all that much trouble to outbeef Tarmo tbh considering that they run equipment and usually Razorcore. In blue Stax I used to run Intuition to fetch Maze as well as any other artifact with an active crucible (and academy ruins).

  13. #13
    Member
    f|i[p]'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    LaLa Land
    Posts

    317

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Goyf has always been a problem for us specially with U/g. It will usually make goyf 5/6 easily countering our important artifacts and enchantments.

    In all honesty, I think stax just needs to find more useful pieces that can stand alone rather than rely on too much synergy.

    Bombs that can stand alone and doesn't rely on anything else is the key, this makes stax players stop wishing they get an armageddon from the top deck just to complete the "magus geddon" wrath effect.

    In this format, I still think that white is the best color for stax. It has singleton effects that destroy or neuter creatures, lands, and enchantments/artifacts all in one card effects..(wrath, Geddon,humility,and more)

    A good fast win condition.

  14. #14
    Cash Money Baller
    BKclassic's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Maine
    Posts

    278

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    I've played a bit with unpowered (with Shops) MUD in Vintage in an aggro heavy metagame and I know exactly what you mean with this Tarmogoyf problem.

    My thoughts are these-

    4 Powder Keg- This is probably an absolute must. In Vintage this kind of sucks because you have to run Orbs to replace Trinisphere that have a 2cc. However, since we aren't running those I really don't think there is a good reason not to run them. Sure, they are slow, but this deck is designed to be slow. Tarmogoyf won't grow that fast against this deck.

    Su-Chi, Juggernaut, Triskelion, etc- These are definitely pointless creatures. Only run creatures that win games, aka Karn, Metalworker and Razormane Masticore (which is functionally a Smokestack that beats for 5 against an aggro deck).

    Tangle Wire just does not seem to work out that well in this deck. Since we can't just put a bunch of moxes on the battlefield, it is hard to get any advantage out of the card. Mostly you and your opponent will just be tapped out for a few turns, while your opponent gets to put more lands into play.

    Some things I am less sure about-
    Mox Diamond- The problem is, with Mox Diamond you are probably talking 25 lands. That plus 4 Metalworkers and we are talking like 33 mana cards. However, running Maze of Ith probably makes this a non issue and seems like a really good idea to me.

    Ensnaring Bridge is probably a necessity somewhere in the 75, as its the only really dependable answer we have for creatures.

    Staff of Domination wins games. We should probably run it.


    With all that said, I would probably run something like this-

    Mana: 30
    4 Metal Worker
    4 Mox Diamond
    4 Ancient Tomb
    4 City of Traitors
    4 Wasteland
    4 Misrha's Factory
    4 Darksteel Citadel (combos with Metalworker)
    1 Dustbowl
    1 Gods' Eye, Gate to the Reikai

    Lock cards- 24
    4 Maze of Ith
    4 Chalice of the Void
    4 Trinisphere
    4 Powder Keg
    4 Crucible of Worlds
    4 Smokestack

    Win- 6
    3 Staff of Domination/Razormane Masticore
    3 Karn, Silver Golem

    SB- 15
    3 Razormane Masticore/Staff of Domination
    4 Ensnaring Bridge
    4 Relic of Progenitus
    4 Defense Grid

    Some things I just remembered after making the decklist-
    -Relic is another somewhat solid answer to Goyf. Possibly a maindeck card.
    -Defense Grid is balls-out awesome against control.

  15. #15

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    There's a TON of good answers to Tarmogoyf...

    Ghostly Prison/Propaganda + Armageddon/Cataclysm or Waste+Crucible
    Magus of the Tabernacle + Armageddon/Cataclysm etc.
    Maze of Ith
    Ensnaring Bridge - Probably the most splashable and best and cheapest option, works fine even if you don't play Bottled Clostier. You can easily keep your hand at 4 cards so that Goyf never gets to hit.

    The problem isn't and wasn't ever Goyf decks which are usually slow enough that you can deal with them.

    The problem is burn decks and elves and zoo and other decks that can kill you in the fourth turn.

    Find a way to beat/elves and I think Stax will reemerge.

    Also, play tons of artifacts. That's the only way to abuse metalworker and make it worth running.

    Lastly, what do you guys think of

    Umbral Mantle?
    Card type: Artifact
    Casting cost: 3
    Card text: Equipped creature has "3, Untap: This creature gets +2/+2 until end of turn." (Untap is the untap symbol.)
    Equip 0


    It takes less mana to combo out with than Staff of Domination. Plus it gives any creature vigilance and pump when it's not going infinite with Metalworker.

  16. #16
    Member
    The Wes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2007
    Location

    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts

    252

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    For armageddon stax, play humility main with elspeths. Along with ghostly prisons, armageddons, and tabernacles it shouldn't be that terribly hard to deal with. If you are really that scared of it play Kor haven. Also, splash green for chokes in the sb. That'll cover a lot of your problems.
    Team <spectacular

  17. #17
    Brony and Proud
    Solaran_X's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts

    387

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Quote Originally Posted by The Wes View Post
    For armageddon stax, play humility main with elspeths. Along with ghostly prisons, armageddons, and tabernacles it shouldn't be that terribly hard to deal with. If you are really that scared of it play Kor haven. Also, splash green for chokes in the sb. That'll cover a lot of your problems.
    If you're gonna splash green, you should also consider Knight of the Reliquary. 1WG, and gets a lot bigger than Tarmogoyf on average - especially following an Armageddon.
    Don't Hate the Herd

  18. #18
    Member
    f|i[p]'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    LaLa Land
    Posts

    317

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    The problem is...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon Stewart View Post
    There's a TON of good answers to Tarmogoyf...

    Ghostly Prison/Propaganda + Armageddon/Cataclysm or Waste+Crucible
    Magus of the Tabernacle + Armageddon/Cataclysm etc.
    Maze of Ith
    Ensnaring Bridge - Probably the most splashable and best and cheapest option, works fine even if you don't play Bottled Clostier. You can easily keep your hand at 4 cards so that Goyf never gets to hit.
    We rely too much on synergy having 2 cards answer 1 card is not an answer. It makes us rely on drawing(top deck) too much.

    Goyf gets through a few turns because we usually have ghostly prisons early on, and the oppenents know better than to put more than 2 creatures online.With tomb and a single goyf hitting us, its a world of pain.

    The reason I like dutch stax better than armageddon stax is because humility is a 1 card solution. Moat stops most of the creatures alone. It does not allow people to pay 2 to be able to attack. Ghostly prison is merely a speed bump, and relies too much on armageddon, magus and other cards to be able to be really useful. The few turns it gives is often not enough.

    Relying too much on synergy is one of the problems. Having 24-26 lands to be able to support mox D. Meaning half of your deck is actually lands and mox'n,which could have put a little more space for spells.

  19. #19
    is selling his Underground Seas.
    Tacosnape's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2006
    Location

    Birmingham, AL
    Posts

    3,148

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    I'm running Garruk Wildspeaker and Metalworker to abuse Winter Orb.

    My solution to Tarmogoyf is the same as my solution to Aether Vial: Powder Keg. I pick Powder Keg pretty much for those exact reasons. It can kill either of those two cards.

    Quote Originally Posted by majikal View Post
    Damn it, Taco, that exactly sums up my opinion on the matter. I need to buy you a beer for that post.

  20. #20
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: Stax/Mud vs. the Tarmogoyf Dilemna

    Ensnaring Bridge+Bottled Cloister need to be 4x. If you get both of those out, your odds increase dramatically. Nothing can attack you, and you get draw. Also with that, you make 2xSmokestack useful. You can just draw draw draw, and use all the "dead draws" (multiple Bridges, Trinis, etc) to fuel the Smokestack. In no time, you'll have an empty board. Even quicker if you get Crucible+Wasteland.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)