View Full Version : {Legacy} The Source Tournament ROUND 3
Dan Turner
06-29-2009, 05:53 AM
Table No. Player Points No. Player
1 16 0016, Maveric78f 6-6 24 0024, 4eak
2 4 0004, mossivo1986 6-6 40 0040, pi4meterftw
3 32 0032, irrelevant 6-6 27 0027, lavafrogg
4 31 0031, [SLAYER]chaos 6-6 36 0036, lordofthepit
5 41 0041, Nazgath 6-6 9 0009, Hollywood
6 18 0018, spirit of the wretch 6-6 30 0030, HdH_Cthulhu
7 47 0047, Pinder 3-3 5 0005, kroelai
8 28 0028, TheInfamousBearAssassin 3-3 29 0029, Sanguine Voyeur
9 34 0034, The Wes 3-3 21 0021, RoddyVR
10 45 0045, Deviruchi 3-3 42 0042, Nihil Credo
11 10 0010, Elof 3-3 12 0012, xTrainx
12 22 0022, Eldariel 3-3 15 0015, Elfrago
13 17 0017, Genericcactus 3-3 8 0008, Guevera59
14 7 0007, Van Phanel 3-3 3 0003, Julian23
15 25 0025, stuckpixel 3-3 1 0001, Goaswerfraiejen
16 14 0014, Dark_Shakuras 3-3 39 0039, Mister Agent
17 46 0046, Forbiddian 0-0 26 0026, roopa
18 44 0044, B0W53R 0-0 11 0011, mujadaddy
19 23 0023, heroicraptor 0-0 37 0037, ykpon
PM sent to Maveric78f with my MSN, e-mail, and available playtime for the week.
peace,
4eak
Maveric78f
06-29-2009, 06:18 AM
Answered to 4eak.
spirit of the wretch
06-29-2009, 08:00 AM
PMed HdH_Cthulhu
Michael Keller
06-29-2009, 08:18 AM
P.M.'ed Nazgath.
ykpon
06-29-2009, 09:32 AM
pm'ed heroicraptor
irrelevant
06-29-2009, 09:35 AM
I lost last round to the Wes it looks like I got credited with the win.
The Wes
06-29-2009, 10:27 AM
Yeah, just saw the same thing. I didn't get credit for my win last round.
Dan Turner
06-29-2009, 12:03 PM
i will fix it asap
Maveric wins 2-1.
Good games. I did not anticipate his card choices and omissions (it was cool to see his deck play out because of this), and he played skillfully. This matchup was in his favor, which showed that he did some good metagaming.
We had some nail-biting fundamental turns.
peace,
4eak
Genericcactus
06-29-2009, 12:15 PM
Won 2-0. He mulled to oblivion.
lavafrogg
06-29-2009, 05:22 PM
Are the pairings messed up?
The Wes
06-29-2009, 05:34 PM
So far yes, irrelevant was given the win for his match against me, but I had won the match.
Maveric78f
06-29-2009, 05:42 PM
Good games. I did not anticipate his card choices and omissions (it was cool to see his deck play out because of this), and he played skillfully. This matchup was in his favor, which showed that he did some good metagaming.
It looks like I made my post in the wrong thread. Yeah, these were good games. I did some mistakes though, that hopefully were not followed by any consequences. Game 1, I lose although it usually easier preboard. Game 2, I mull once but all my cards will have their golden purpose in this game. I finish all in although he has nothing to respond in his 4-cards hand (nail biting turn actually). Game 3 was tight too, but as I did not know he add any answers I was not too much worried.
Dan Turner
06-29-2009, 06:04 PM
So far yes, irrelevant was given the win for his match against me, but I had won the match.
switch your alls opponents and i will get it switched over inty he computer
The Wes
06-29-2009, 06:07 PM
So I play lavafrogg while irrelevant plays RoddyVR? Ok.
lavafrogg
06-29-2009, 06:26 PM
Message sent to the Wes
Nihil Credo
06-29-2009, 06:36 PM
PM'd Deviruchi.
pi4meterftw
06-29-2009, 06:52 PM
PMd Mossivo1986.
The Wes
06-29-2009, 10:37 PM
After 8 epic games lavafrogg pulls out the win. I knew we should have played the best of 13 games....
lavafrogg takes it 2-1 against The Wes.
lavafrogg
06-29-2009, 10:37 PM
Lavafrogg 2-1 over the Wes.
Great Games, all 8 of them. We had some MWS issues but all the dropped games were hard fought close battles. He won game his game on turn 2, what can you do....lol
Sanguine Voyeur
06-30-2009, 08:10 AM
Contacted opponent.
Van Phanel
06-30-2009, 09:28 AM
Van Phanel - Julian 23 2-0
I make a mistake that should have cost me G1, then he offsets my mistake by making one of his own. Lucky me. In G2 he only draws his sideboard, but nothing to kill me in time.
Also stupid new rules. Without them, playing Solidarity would be so much easier. On the other hand it's fun having to squeeze even the last tiny bit of advantage out of the deck.
Julian23
06-30-2009, 09:33 AM
On the other hand it's fun having to squeeze even the last tiny bit of advantage out of the deck.
- A concept I'm not as familiar with as I wish I was ;-) Good games. Chant is such a terrible sb card against Solidarity *sigh* :rolleyes:
Eldariel
06-30-2009, 11:33 AM
Elfrago let me know he dropped R2 so I guess that's a Bye for me.
RoddyVR
06-30-2009, 12:55 PM
switch your alls opponents and i will get it switched over inty he computer
So I play lavafrogg while irrelevant plays RoddyVR? Ok.
PMed Irrelevant with my available times.
heroicraptor
06-30-2009, 02:14 PM
I wink 2-0 vs ykpon. I wish he'd gotten better draws.
ykpon
06-30-2009, 02:15 PM
i lost 0-2 and drop from the tournament. ty, Magic Fanatic
pi4meterftw
06-30-2009, 04:05 PM
Pi4meterftw wins 2-0 over Mossivo1986. gg's
spirit of the wretch
06-30-2009, 04:19 PM
I beat HdH_Cthulhu 2:0
HdH_Cthulhu
06-30-2009, 04:20 PM
I lost 2:0 against spirit of the wretch
mossivo1986
06-30-2009, 04:36 PM
lost 2-0
Maveric78f
06-30-2009, 04:56 PM
How many rounds will we play? 5 or 6?
Dan Turner
06-30-2009, 05:43 PM
How many rounds will we play? 5 or 6?
i think i have it set up for 6
Dark_Shakuras
07-01-2009, 03:58 AM
I dropped... Why am I in again...
spirit of the wretch
07-01-2009, 05:34 AM
Will there be a cut to top8?
Michael Keller
07-01-2009, 07:10 AM
Still no word back yet from Nazgath. The holiday weekend is approaching so hopefully he gets back to me as soon as possible.
What holiday? For us non-americans that is :)
Michael Keller
07-01-2009, 08:56 AM
What holiday? For us non-americans that is :)
That would be Independence Day; the celebration of our nation's birthday.
Dan Turner
07-01-2009, 09:09 AM
That would be Independence Day; the celebration of our nation's birthday.
and yes there will be a cut to top 8
irrelevant
07-01-2009, 09:38 AM
setting up a time with roddyVR
Oh, sorry, didn't reflect at what date it is... Sadly, we swedes don't celebrate our independence very much, it's just not a big thing and I'm pretty sorry for it. I wish I could feel as much for my country as you guys does... I mean, ffs, in most hockey tournaments I'm cheering for Kanada... :S
Mister Agent
07-01-2009, 01:44 PM
Still haven't heard from my opponent.
Pinder
07-01-2009, 03:40 PM
My laptop is currently down for the count, so I'm afraid I won't have reliable internet access for a while (at the very least, internet access with MWS installed), so I'm going to have to scoop this round and drop from the tournament :frown:.
Eldariel
07-01-2009, 06:12 PM
Oh, sorry, didn't reflect at what date it is... Sadly, we swedes don't celebrate our independence very much, it's just not a big thing and I'm pretty sorry for it. I wish I could feel as much for my country as you guys does... I mean, ffs, in most hockey tournaments I'm cheering for Kanada... :S
That's 'cause you never had to fight for your independence, o' Swedish Overlords.
Wargoos
07-01-2009, 06:31 PM
That's 'cause you never had to fight for your independence, o' Swedish Overlords.
What about me?
Should I be proud of being freed off bloody aristocracy to reddish communism?
B0W53R
07-01-2009, 10:29 PM
Somebody has to be 0-3 so it might as well be me! Mujadaddy takes it 2-1.
mujadaddy
07-01-2009, 10:50 PM
Confirmed, mujadaddy > B0w53r, 2-1
...since these things (Source tournaments) aren't sanctioned or anything, is there any interest in shaking up the process, specifically making matches 3 out of 5, or any other suggestions? I think the value in these things isn't reproducing a DCI environment, but rather gathering data about deck performance.
lordofthepit
07-02-2009, 12:36 AM
PM'ed [SLAYER]Chaos.
That's 'cause you never had to fight for your independence, o' Swedish Overlords.
Haha! True! The only thing we fight about is us vs you guys in the world cup of hockey :)
@Topic: No word from my opponent yet :(
Mister Agent
07-02-2009, 05:52 AM
I dropped... Why am I in again...
Looks like my opponent dropped so I get a bye. Heh.
Nihil Credo
07-02-2009, 10:57 AM
No reply from Deviruchi yet.
Michael Keller
07-02-2009, 11:02 AM
I have heard back from Nazgath, but we're having some scheduling conflicts. I'm working on it.
Nazgath
07-02-2009, 02:56 PM
Reporting a 2-1 win over Hollywood.
I played horribly and didn't get punished overly for it, while he just drew like shit.
Michael Keller
07-02-2009, 02:58 PM
Reporting a 2-1 win over Hollywood.
I played horribly and didn't get punished overly for it, while he just drew like shit.
Lost 1-2 to Nazgath; confirmed. I gambled the third game being on the play with my opening seven. Unfortunately, I proceeded to draw no land for the next seven turns.
pi4meterftw
07-02-2009, 03:28 PM
Confirmed, mujadaddy > B0w53r, 2-1
...since these things (Source tournaments) aren't sanctioned or anything, is there any interest in shaking up the process, specifically making matches 3 out of 5, or any other suggestions? I think the value in these things isn't reproducing a DCI environment, but rather gathering data about deck performance.
There's no reason to change anything. Actually, there's a reason to favor not making this change other than it not being how a real tournament would proceed, and that is that it might create more drops since people will probably have a hard time finding enough time to sit down at their computer. I could probably do first to 3 wins, but I don't favor such a "format" since it would not parallel the official policy.
irrelevant
07-02-2009, 08:21 PM
RoddyVR wins 2-1 good games and drop me from the tournament. My comp just disconnected after game three i wasn't being a dick :)
RoddyVR
07-02-2009, 08:35 PM
RoddyVR wins 2-1 good games and drop me from the tournament. My comp just disconnected after game three i wasn't being a dick :)
Confirmed 2-1 for me. realy good games. seemed like both of us drew more answers then things to have answered. I'm glad we realy lucked on on the disconnects... got one after game 1 ended but before game 2 started, and then again after game 3 ended.
Its wierd having a tournament go on for weeks.
roopa
07-02-2009, 10:18 PM
i won 2-0 over forbiddian.
looked like mws wasnt giving him lands. oh well, ggs.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
07-02-2009, 10:55 PM
Won 2-1.
mujadaddy
07-03-2009, 04:04 AM
There's no reason to change anything. NO reason? Umm, ok.
Actually, there's a reason to favor not making this change -- it might create more dropsLong round time is why it's not done officially. If you can find 30 minutes, you ought to be able to find an hour.
I could probably do first to 3 wins, but I don't favor such a "format" since it would not parallel the official policy.But these tournaments aren't official ANYWAY. All I'm saying is that you'd get much more interesting data from more matches than from the 2/3. 2/3 actually produces more RANDOM results than more matches would.
As I mentioned, a non-sanctioned tournament ought to produce results that are insightful, not merely structured similarly to the sanctioned.
Michael Keller
07-03-2009, 04:08 AM
Right, but in doing so you'd be skewing data when the tournament is actually finished. It's a novel idea, but in an honest tournament match two games out of three is the standard for which we base our matches to begin with. If someone gets mana-screwed (like I did), that's the way it is.
If we wanted to use MWS as a testing utility (which we do anyways), we could play a hundred matches outside of this event. In mock-sanctioned play, the standard event rules should be set in place.
RoddyVR
07-03-2009, 09:03 AM
It would also skew the Pre/post board relevance of a match... if i lose horribly to combo game one, but then board in enough hate that i can keep it in check prety easily after board, my match against them is still not great, cause they win game one, and then i have to not be unlucky for two games. If its 5 games, then i have considerably more chances WITH my sideboard then i do without.
Dan Turner
07-03-2009, 11:34 AM
4 more matches to go
pi4meterftw
07-03-2009, 12:56 PM
NO reason? Umm, ok.
Long round time is why it's not done officially. If you can find 30 minutes, you ought to be able to find an hour.
But these tournaments aren't official ANYWAY. All I'm saying is that you'd get much more interesting data from more matches than from the 2/3. 2/3 actually produces more RANDOM results than more matches would.
As I mentioned, a non-sanctioned tournament ought to produce results that are insightful, not merely structured similarly to the sanctioned.
Yeah, obviously there's no reason but if you need the proof, read the two posts below yours. I just thought it was so self-evident as to not need justification, since afterall, what you want in testing is to see how your deck would do in a real tournament, so even one thing being different (no goyfs, for example) would render the data essentially useless. It'd be fun, sure. That's why I participated. But you can't also use the data except possibly in in rather inconvenient (read nearly impossible) ways. (Where you essentially keep the part of the data that still works.) I won't say more about how the "tournaments aren't official ANYWAY" than just to note that it's ridiculous to do something stupid, in general, just because you can. As a special case of this principal, what I'm claiming about that comment follows.
As for your last comment, if you are wondering about how a first person to win 3 games tournament would go, then I guess you would find such a tournament insightful. But I gather that what you're actually interested in is how good various decks are. in that case, if you played best to 3, you'd end up trying to remember every match who got to two wins first so that you could remember some relevant data, and then that would be skewed because it would have changed who won the match and stuff. Reasons like this make compensating for ridiculously altered tournament rules nearly impossible when trying to collect meaningful data.
Also, lastly I'd like to address your comment that "If you can find 30 minutes, you ought to be able to find an hour." I find no basis for this at all. Afterall, what if one can find 45 minutes? Unless you're saying that's impossible, there's your disproof.
Forbiddian
07-03-2009, 06:43 PM
Actually, for untimed rounds, DCI tends to sanction best 3/5 on the pro tour, for all the reasons stated.
Although changing it mid-tournament might screw over some combo players (esp. weird combos) who were banking on a free win game 1, it'd be nice if the next tournament was held best 3/5.
Dan Turner
07-03-2009, 07:39 PM
I will think about it
mossivo1986
07-03-2009, 07:40 PM
I think 3-5 would be a better situation anyways. But only for the top 8. It's un-real that anyone is fighting AGAINST 3-5 based on time. Drop from the tourney if you don't have time. You shouldn't have played with the assumption that you may not have time anyways. Geeze.
roopa
07-03-2009, 08:04 PM
i don't know about you guys, but i don't feel like playing 5 games against landstill or counterbalance.dec. Dont get me wrong, i enjoy wasting 4 hours of my life just as much as the next guy, but it might create some scheduling issues.
Dan Turner
07-03-2009, 09:07 PM
ok here are going to be the prizes:
For the next Tournament
1st 4 Byes
2nd 3 byes
3rd 2 Byes
4th 1 Bye
Still no word...
Still nothing and I'm not sure I have time tomorrow, I can't book up my time just in case... :/
Deviruchi
07-05-2009, 04:00 AM
Deviruchi wins 2-0 vs Nihil Credo
And again nothing, I won't be up for many more hours and I got a ton of other stuff to do... :/
xTrainx
07-05-2009, 03:39 PM
And again nothing, I won't be up for many more hours and I got a ton of other stuff to do... :/
Sorry, I've been away on vacation and forgot to let you guys know. I'll drop, giving elof an 0-2 win.
pi4meterftw
07-05-2009, 04:45 PM
ok here are going to be the prizes:
For the next Tournament
1st 4 Byes
2nd 3 byes
3rd 2 Byes
4th 1 Bye
Will 3rd and 4th be decided by a match or swiss standings, or something else?
Dan Turner
07-05-2009, 10:03 PM
Will 3rd and 4th be decided by a match or swiss standings, or something else?
swiss standings
rockout
07-05-2009, 10:16 PM
I think 4 byes is way too many. I think 3-2-1-1 seems pretty fair. 4 byes is almost guaranteeing a top 8 again.
Goaswerfraiejen
07-05-2009, 10:31 PM
Sigh. Haven't heard back from Stuckpixel since Tuesday the 30th of June. I guess that means another draw for me.
I've been rather disappointed with my lot in this tournament. I've tried extremely hard to be very available despite (still) currently lacking my laptop, yet only succeeded in actually playing one match. It's very frustrating.
Because my laptop STILL isn't fixed (it's been a month, and it was supposed to take only four days tops...), I am going to have to drop from the tournament. I am heading for Europe tomorrow morning, and without my laptop I simply cannot guarantee being able to play any games. Not that it really matters, of course.
So, yeah. Draw and drop, I guess. :frown:
Dan Turner
07-06-2009, 12:38 AM
Sigh. Haven't heard back from Stuckpixel since Tuesday the 30th of June. I guess that means another draw for me.
I've been rather disappointed with my lot in this tournament. I've tried extremely hard to be very available despite (still) currently lacking my laptop, yet only succeeded in actually playing one match. It's very frustrating.
Because my laptop STILL isn't fixed (it's been a month, and it was supposed to take only four days tops...), I am going to have to drop from the tournament. I am heading for Europe tomorrow morning, and without my laptop I simply cannot guarantee being able to play any games. Not that it really matters, of course.
So, yeah. Draw and drop, I guess. :frown:
UMM there are no draws if he does not post he drops and you get the win
Nihil Credo
07-06-2009, 04:51 AM
Deviruchi wins 2-0 vs Nihil Credo
Confirmed.
rockout
07-06-2009, 12:33 PM
If someone drops I'm willing to fill in for them. You can just give me all loses up to this point I don't really care. If it means someone gets an opponent I'm cool with it.
Maveric78f
07-06-2009, 02:25 PM
I feel a bit concerned by the lateness of 4th round launch becasue I won't be available during the whole WE (and a bit more).
mossivo1986
07-06-2009, 02:48 PM
I feel a bit concerned as well; as I have to take a laxative tonight. (sarcasm)
lavafrogg
07-06-2009, 02:50 PM
Does anyone know whats going on?
Dan Turner
07-06-2009, 03:05 PM
I just got back into town after the holiday
I will have next round up in 15 mins or so
Stuckpixel
[Slayer]Chaos
both are no show so they drop and give there opponent the win
Dan Turner
07-06-2009, 03:11 PM
After 3 rounds of play
Tie 1 Tie 2 Tie 3 Matches
Rank No. Name Points OMW% PGW% OGW% P/W/D/B
1 16 0016, Maveric78f 9 55.5556 85.7143 51.5873 3/3/0/0
2 41 0041, Nazgath 9 55.5556 75.0000 53.4392 3/3/0/0
3 36 0036, lordofthepit 9 55.5556 75.0000 48.6111 3/3/0/0
4 18 0018, spirit of the wretch 9 44.4444 100.0000 44.4444 3/3/0/0
5 40 0040, pi4meterftw 9 44.4444 85.7143 42.6587 3/3/0/0
6 27 0027, lavafrogg 9 44.4444 75.0000 46.2963 3/3/0/0
7 31 0031, [SLAYER]chaos 6 77.7778 50.0000 72.6190 3/2/0/0
8 30 0030, HdH_Cthulhu 6 72.2222 66.6667 69.0476 3/2/0/0
9 9 0009, Hollywood 6 66.6667 55.5556 60.1190 3/2/0/0
10 21 0021, RoddyVR 6 66.6667 50.0000 64.2196 3/2/0/0
11 24 0024, 4eak 6 61.1111 71.4286 56.3492 3/2/0/0
12 5 0005, kroelai 6 55.5556 71.4286 53.5714 3/2/0/0
13 39 0039, Mister Agent 6 55.5556 62.5000 47.2222 3/2/0/0
14 4 0004, mossivo1986 6 55.5556 57.1429 53.9683 3/2/0/0
15 32 0032, The Wes 6 55.5556 55.5556 54.1005 3/2/0/0
16 22 0022, Eldariel 6 44.4444 71.4286 42.0635 3/2/0/0
17 1 0001, Goaswerfraiejen 6 44.4444 71.4286 38.8889 3/2/0/0
18 17 0017, Genericcactus 6 44.4444 62.5000 47.0899 3/2/0/0
19 28 0028, TheInfamousBearAssassin 6 44.4444 62.5000 44.4444 3/2/0/0
20 7 0007, Van Phanel 6 44.4444 57.1429 48.1481 3/2/0/0
21 10 0010, Elof 6 38.8889 66.6667 38.8889 3/2/0/0
22 45 0045, Deviruchi 6 33.3333 66.6667 40.2778 3/2/0/0
23 29 0029, Sanguine Voyeur 3 77.7778 50.0000 68.0556 3/1/0/0
24 33 0033, muradin 3 75.0000 50.0000 75.0000 2/1/0/0
25 6 0006, blueneverfails 3 66.6667 50.0000 66.6667 2/1/0/0
26 47 0047, Pinder 3 66.6667 42.8571 64.2857 2/0/0/1
27 42 0042, Nihil Credo 3 66.6667 37.5000 65.6085 3/1/0/0
28 25 0025, stuckpixel 3 66.6667 33.3333 68.2540 3/1/0/0
29 14 0014, Dark_Shakuras 3 66.6667 33.3333 56.9444 3/1/0/0
30 34 0034, irrelevant 3 55.5556 44.4444 49.4709 3/1/0/0
31 26 0026, roopa 3 55.5556 42.8571 53.4392 3/1/0/0
32 8 0008, Guevera59 3 55.5556 42.8571 50.4630 3/1/0/0
33 3 0003, Julian23 3 55.5556 33.3333 53.9683 3/1/0/0
34 12 0012, xTrainx 3 55.5556 33.3333 52.3810 3/1/0/0
35 11 0011, mujadaddy 3 44.4444 44.4444 42.6587 3/1/0/0
36 15 0015, Elfrago 3 44.4444 42.8571 52.9101 3/1/0/0
37 23 0023, heroicraptor 3 44.4444 42.8571 46.2302 3/1/0/0
38 13 0013, SpikeyMikey 0 100.0000 0.0000 100.0000 1/0/0/0
39 19 0019, tyleredw 0 100.0000 0.0000 100.0000 1/0/0/0
40 43 0043, clavio 0 100.0000 0.0000 100.0000 1/0/0/0
41 2 0002., Zir 0 75.0000 20.0000 58.3333 2/0/0/0
42 44 0044, B0W53R 0 66.6667 14.2857 65.6085 3/0/0/0
43 46 0046, Forbiddian 0 66.6667 0.0000 63.0952 3/0/0/0
44 38 0038, Roman Candle 0 50.0000 20.0000 50.0000 2/0/0/0
45 20 0020, DuxDucis 0 50.0000 0.0000 55.0000 2/0/0/0
46 35 0035, Magic Fanatic 0 50.0000 0.0000 50.0000 2/0/0/0
47 37 0037, ykpon 0 33.3333 0.0000 39.6825 3/0/0/0
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.