View Full Version : [Articles] The History of Legacy
n00bas4urus_r3x
06-10-2011, 11:18 AM
So far a 3 part article series by Nightmare. Great writing about the yester-years of this format's past. It's been great to read, having flash backs since 2004 when I started to play legacy. Oh, I yearn for the days of the FTK! Pre-goyf legacy was fantastic. Great work Nightmare.
Part 1 (http://www.channelfireball.com/home/recurring-nightmares-geocentrism/)
Part 2 (http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/recurring-nightmares-tychonicism/)
Part 3 (http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/recurring-nightmares-heliocentrism/)
Setting myself a reminder to read these when I get out of work... I'm looking forward to flashing back to the good ol' days...
majikal
06-10-2011, 12:51 PM
For some reason, whenever I click a link on Channelfireball.com, it just takes me back to the home page.
edit: WHICH IS A SHAME, because I REALLY want to read their article explaining why Coiling Oracle (lol) should be banned in Legacy.
stealth
06-10-2011, 07:16 PM
@majikal, I have same problem when browsing from my phone, so to bypass this i scroll down and click on the author and then can select the article from thier list.
Thanks Nightmare.
Obviously, this is a massive undertaking. I really enjoyed reading it. I hope your last installment, however cliche it may seem, will be about future thoughts/concerns about Legacy.
peace,
4eak
Zilla
06-10-2011, 10:32 PM
Any comprehensive history of Legacy failing to mention Thunder Bluff is a travesty.
Any comprehensive history of Legacy failing to mention Thunder Bluff is a travesty.
+1
DragoFireheart
06-10-2011, 10:40 PM
Ah Tarmogoyf. Over half that article was devoted to the most efficient creature in magic.
Zilla
06-10-2011, 10:53 PM
The most efficient creature in magic is Anaba Grunt. That's why it's banned in every format.
DragoFireheart
06-10-2011, 10:56 PM
The most efficient creature in magic is Anaba Grunt. That's why it's banned in every format.
I was talking about legal cards.
Obviously if we are talking about any card, Contract from Below is easily the most powerful. DUH! :laugh:
TeenieBopper
06-10-2011, 10:56 PM
The most efficient creature in magic is Anaba Grunt. That's why it's banned in every format.
I love and miss you, Zilla.
Fantastic series. I was in college during Legacy's birth and missed out on the pre-Tarmogoyf days (although I also missed the travesty of Flash, and for that I am thankful). I'm pretty happy with Legacy now and have been since I returned to Magic in 2009.
Oh man... I remember the "Werebear vs Tarmogoyf" discussion... and Werebear was winning due to mana, and the leading argument in favor of Tarmogoyf was how ugly Werebear was =O
Amazing set of articles, reminds me of many many things. Congratulations man, you lived through Legacy! ^^
Watcher487
06-11-2011, 01:07 AM
Woot, thanks for the name drop Nightmare. Damn it's been a long time since I've seen that list.
And yes, for the record, it was a blast to play.
Dark Ritual
06-11-2011, 01:54 AM
You didn't mention fledgling dragon :O or the greatness of mystic enforcer lulz.
Overall great work though. I would gladly play legacy with cards only available prior to 2006; just to be able to play goyfless legacy, no countertop, UWr landstill, and mystic enforcer of course.
Werebear > tarmogoyf art wise. I hate goyf's art; goyf's art is just a disgrace. Werebear at least has cool flavor text as well. Tapping for a green is coolish too.
FTK'ing negator would have been sweet too. 8 for one you lulz. Still don't get how negator was that good back then anyways; bolt on turn one wrecked it as well. Or you were clever and they went dark rit, negator and turn 2 laid their land and you cast bolt on it to double time walk the opponent. Negator just isn't that sweet IMO even in '05.
Yeah way to go getting a foil set of goyf's for $8 btw. That's winning right there since the price for foil goyf is now 200 a pop.
Overall great articles though.
dahcmai
06-11-2011, 03:14 AM
My god, I feel old now. I learned how to play by reading the instructions trying to figure out the game for a girlfriends son. I was 23 then. It was 1994. I thought paying $20 for a Mox back then was really stupid. It still kills me to look back on it.
Gheizen64
06-11-2011, 11:19 AM
Fledgling dragon and Mystic Enforcer off sungrass prairie lmao.
The werebear-Goyf debate was also good stuff. Man how was shocking playtesting with it.
Bardo
06-11-2011, 02:50 PM
Werebear at least has cool flavor text as well.
Tempa-ban for you.
Shawon
06-11-2011, 03:25 PM
The most efficient creature in magic is Anaba Grunt. That's why it's banned in every format.
I seem to be the only one person in the entire Magic community to not understand the origin of the joke. Was 'Anaba Grunt' an actual Magic card or joke card like Blacker Lotus? I tried typing in Anaba Grunt in Gatherer and in google and never found a picture.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
06-11-2011, 04:32 PM
Yeah, Adam, I know you want to be liked and all but I'm pretty sure the "Legacy players are elitist" was not something people actually thought and just something a few disgruntled ManaDrain/ManaLeak people came up with to have something to validate their constant wrong-headed assertions about the format. Like, sure, their points were disproved and their deck sucks, but isn't it elitist of you to say so?
I'm pretty sure that in no other format is there a concern that the people who work on it constantly think their opinion is worth more than those who just randomly wandered in. I mean it's bizarre to even think of that as problematic.
n00bas4urus_r3x
06-11-2011, 07:07 PM
I seem to be the only one person in the entire Magic community to not understand the origin of the joke. Was 'Anaba Grunt' an actual Magic card or joke card like Blacker Lotus? I tried typing in Anaba Grunt in Gatherer and in google and never found a picture.
And the hits keep coming. He was truly a one card combo. Playing Grunt in a deck with Didgeridoo and Tahngarth was obscenly unfair.
IBA, didn't you get banned from SCG's forum for having an elitist discussion with Ben? Right around Flash if I recall.
Someone unarchieve the Source Cards thread.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
06-11-2011, 07:10 PM
No, I was already banned. I was banned again for using a prop account.
My brother, on the other hand, was banned for having an elitist (i.e., being right) conversation Bleiweiss. Either that or being my brother, it wasn't really clear which.
eta, also:
http://www.mtgthesource.com/forums/showthread.php?5397-Source-Cards-%28and-only-Source-Cards%29
This is awesome. Nightmare you're awesome.
Amazing articles, looking forward to reading the final one. Thanks, Nightmare.
trivial_matters
06-12-2011, 08:18 AM
Amazing articles, looking forward to reading the final one. Thanks, Nightmare.
DragoFireheart
06-12-2011, 10:02 AM
I seem to be the only one person in the entire Magic community to not understand the origin of the joke. Was 'Anaba Grunt' an actual Magic card or joke card like Blacker Lotus? I tried typing in Anaba Grunt in Gatherer and in google and never found a picture.
http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w308/veedee1307/AnabaGrunt.jpg
troopatroop
06-12-2011, 01:22 PM
............
Just.... No.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
06-12-2011, 04:09 PM
Just.... No.
SpikeyMikey
06-12-2011, 07:15 PM
To be honest, the number one reason I read the first article was to see how different your recollection of the birth of the format was from mine. I am happy to hear someone from the East Coast admit that ATS was trash, even if it is 7 years late. It was a very regionalized view, but I expected that. At least you mentioned that the West Coast existed, which was more than anyone was willing to do in '04.
Jack: the old guard had a well-deserved reputation for elitism. You don't realize it only because guys like TB or FakeSpam were no worse then than you are today. The only reason that I can stand you is because I usually agree with you. But any of you three could give Tucker Max lessons in assholery. When I first posted UGBW Landstill because I was tearing up the 45-50 man weekly tournaments in San Diego (the largest weekly tournaments in the US at the time), it was promptly dismissed by the East Coasters who were convinced that ATS was the only tier 1 deck (and were still convinced that the 2-for-1 manafacts were broken and would eventually spawn the most domiinating deck ever). Dave Hernandez posted Zoo because Chris and I weren't even going to bother, knowing the general feeling that the 'cusers who dominated the site had towards aggro. Even then, the first dozen pages of the San Diego Zoo thread looked eerily similar to Finn's Mefolk thread now, with most people scoffing at the idea that the deck could be competitive and denouncing cards they'd never even seen played.
It's largely for that reason that I don't post decklists anymore. I'll PM lists I'm working on to people who express interest, but I don't make them public. If the two best lists I ever designed (or co-designed in the case of Zoo) got nothing but hate and contempt, why bother sharing any new ideas? It's unlikely that the stuff I'm working on now will still be relevant 7 years from now.
So yeah, I agree with Adam's assessment that it was for the good of the format when those people went away. Otherwise, good article. I will read the 2nd and 3rd links when I get home. I'm hoping you'll include the early Gen Con Worlds T8's. Big Arse was only representative of the EC meta.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
06-12-2011, 08:07 PM
Fundamentally, I think it's unreasonable to expect to challenge wide-spread assumptions without having to defend your challenge. If you went to a serious forum on Standard and started trashing Caw-Blade or talked about how Soldiers was the best undiscovered deck, you wouldn't have an easier time of it. I didn't pop over to the Mana Drain and start telling people what was the best Vintage deck, and if I had I certainly expected to be challenged on it and have to defend my points with well-constructed arguments. I don't go out lecturing about the intricacies of any draft environment I haven't played extensively.
I mean I had to deal with these people. The first deck I ever posted on this site was a 1.5 era MWC deck in the era of powered Workshop/Bazaar/ManaDrain decks that tried to win with soldiers and Skullclamp. When NOVA players got tired of dealing with the bullshit coming out of New Yorkers we didn't complain, we drove up seven-eight hours to kick their asses and take their money.
This is and should be a serious discussion board, and if in being such it has a chilling effect on people spamming out bad decklists and ill-thought out arguments, good. If pros that have never touched the format before don't want to come over and post terrible decklists and talk about how unexplored Legacy is/how their deck should dominate it, because they think we're insular or elitist, good.
This idea that all opinions are or should be equal, regardless of experience, is so much bullshit, frankly.
SpikeyMikey
06-12-2011, 09:48 PM
It was annoying. I remember Smemmen posting an article on SCG after the change saying that he was going to break the format open with FEB (Full English Breakfast, a Volrath's Shapeshifter deck, for those of you without an eternal tenire stretching back over a decade). There were others, but he was the main antagonist. As an aside, I have 1 warning on this site and I'm almost positive it was for trashing the shit out of Steve. Ironically enough, Nightmare was the one who gave it to me. But I wasn't walking into the forums as some Vintage name trying to show my poor cousins how to break a format. I'd made the switch a year prior and I wasn't posting theoretical bullshit combo decks, I was posting the most advanced control deck of the era with results to back it up. But I couldn't head to NY to prove it. I'm sure NOVA to NY is quite the trip, but it's not the Mexican border on the Pacific to the Canadian border on the Atlantic. And the SD meta was twice the size of anything else in the country or better. I doubt there's a scene even now that posts bigger weekly events than we did. But that's what I'm saying. You guys out East were so insular and so fucking cocky you wouldn't even fucking test the shit that was doing well elsewhere. That's why there were 3 distinct metas and why the SD crew stopped posting on this site.
troopatroop
06-12-2011, 11:47 PM
You guys out East were so insular and so fucking cocky you wouldn't even fucking test the shit that was doing well elsewhere. That's why there were 3 distinct metas and why the SD crew stopped posting on this site.
I played San Diego Zoo for awhile, and plenty of people played BUG Landstill after that list was posted. I always thought, "Wow 50-60 players at these West Coast Tournaments??". Your opinion was actually respected by many, and that deck was good, it was also pretty clear that you and your friends were the "ringers" of that environment. I read some tournament reports back then, but I seem to remember alot of "scrub" titles for rounds. He's writing about his perspective of how Legacy grew up, and if you take offense to your pov being absent, than you really just want some recognition. It's not like you guys were open minded.
And I played ATS for 2 years, and I won plenty of games without Survival. That deck could go 50/50 with Welder MuD, and destroy people with Quirion Ranger + Rofellos. Sticking a Survival was GG, and it was the hardest deck to play at the time. Maybe it was a pile without Survival, but 1.5 was all about balls. If you wanted to win with Tradewind Rider and Seedborn Muse, you could.
Gilded Drake, Mystic Snake, Uktabi Orangutan. I remember when Eternal Witness got printed and Survival players rejoiced. I still remember losing at some Syracuse tournament when I disenchanted some NoVa player when he had a mana up. Those mistakes you'll never forget...
Edit: Oh, and great article.
SpikeyMikey
06-13-2011, 12:14 AM
Troop: I'm not surprised that his perspective was different than mine. I actually think Nightmare's articles (I did end up reading the other two on my phone while driving around delivering pizzas because I'm a terrible human being) were excellent and I don't mind the regionalism at all. To be honest, I was surprised that he touched on other metagames; like I said, there was a vocal segment of the site that ignored anything that didn't happen in snowy places.
He's writing what he knows and I'd rather that than try and come up with some objective look at what was going on that whole time, like he doesn't even touch on European Legacy but it's probably a good thing; he'd probably get it wrong. I certainly would. I know nothing of European Legacy until shortly prior to the M. Tutor ban. IBA just has the ability to drive me bonkers, much as he does to a lot of other people. And to be honest, the EC/WC/Dallas TX thing was a real sore point for me back then. I'm surprised that I've still got as much anger about that as I do, but it frustrated me no end. I wasn't particularly enamored with U/G Madness, but I felt like the Texas metagame got an even shorter end of the stick around here than we did. I guess I just have a lot of residual frustration from that era.
On ATS: The deck could win without Survival, but it didn't do so nearly as well as RGSA. It was definitely a bad aggro backup plan. Of course, ATS was better at landing Survival than RGSA or WeldSur because it packed E. Tutor and Force of Will, but a terribly low blue count that always left me feeling like RecSur was actually the best Survival deck (or the aforementioned RGSA). Still, I wrote a primer on Survival decks back then and I treated it with respect, since I knew I'd get flamed to hell and back if I said I felt like it was simply worse than any other Survival deck.
Tbh, I wasn't really aware that anyone paid any attention to anything that was coming out of San Diego back then. I guess you can say I want recognition (not a lot of people that don't) but at this point, it's water under the bridge. Like I said, the comment was more aimed at IBA and the ghosts of TeenieBoppers past. I'm not sure if it came off like it or not, but I wasn't trying to say that I wanted to be in Nightmare's article, just that IBA's implication that I was posting untested crap like a lot of people were wont to do back then was unwarranted.
Thanks for jumping in on this one Troop, it really helped me calm down and get my head on straight again. I just need to remember it's not January of '05. :)
Hanni
06-13-2011, 12:44 AM
@ Spikey
I drove 8 hours to play the the SCG Dual for Duals in VA back in 2006, just so my UWb Fish deck could get some recognition. Unfortunately, I came in 9th (bad tiebreakers), and many people on the Source still scoffed it off, even with wins against some big names like Alix Hatfield. Shit happens, Legacy used to be elitist. It's not really any better now, with such a big flood of IMPS. Just play the game to enjoy it, and screw the ignoramus who understimate good ideas.
Beatusnox
06-13-2011, 01:14 AM
@ Spikey
I drove 8 hours to play the the SCG Dual for Duals in VA back in 2006, just so my UWb Fish deck could get some recognition. Unfortunately, I came in 9th (bad tiebreakers), and many people on the Source still scoffed it off, even with wins against some big names like Alix Hatfield. Shit happens, Legacy used to be elitist. It's not really any better now, with such a big flood of IMPS. Just play the game to enjoy it, and screw the ignoramus who understimate good ideas.
Agree with this completely. No matter what you do or say, someone will Always disagree.
Beyond that, I have been playing magic since Onslaught, so compared to many on here I am a new player. I started Casually and didnt start playing competitively until Betrayers. It is nice to see where the format came from. Even if it does not include all angles according to some, it is nice to read.
TheInfamousBearAssassin
06-13-2011, 01:46 AM
What decks do you think were taken seriously or accepted as tier'd off the bat? That never happens. Every deck has to prove itself. Hell, Thresh had to prove itself, and that would eventually become the ubiquitous archetype for Legacy decks. Landstill had to prove itself. So did Vial Goblins. Not coincidentally, in the process lists got polished and the proving got easier.
A lot of great decks probably existed and exist that just don't get played, but that's reality. If you want people to play your brew you have to pitch it aggressively, deal with whatever criticisms people come up with in a level-headed fashion, and be able to articulate its strategy to victory and how to play the thing correctly. And you need results, and more than 9th at one tournament. Generally more than just one guy, so you also need to persuade others to build it.
The metagame, aka what people feel like playing on any given weekend, is a fickle force, and bending it even partly to your whim takes effort and luck. Moreso the further you're trying to buck orthodoxy.
anonymos
06-14-2011, 12:31 AM
Tbh, I wasn't really aware that anyone paid any attention to anything that was coming out of San Diego back then. I guess you can say I want recognition (not a lot of people that don't) but at this point, it's water under the bridge. Like I said, the comment was more aimed at IBA and the ghosts of TeenieBoppers past. I'm not sure if it came off like it or not, but I wasn't trying to say that I wanted to be in Nightmare's article, just that IBA's implication that I was posting untested crap like a lot of people were wont to do back then was unwarranted.
Weird part about this is that I started playing Legacy in some store in NY. It was in a mall. Clifton Park maybe? I got stationed in San Diego about the time they split the lists. There was a lot of animosity toward the northerners, so I just shut my mouth about it. The only thing about the arguing back and forth was the ignoring of Rod's reanimator list that was beating face in San Diego. It's actually the current start of the U/B reanimator thread that's still active 6 or 7 years later.
On a more important topic, when's the rest of the series going up?
ns2973
06-15-2011, 04:54 PM
Any comprehensive history of Legacy failing to mention Thunder Bluff is a travesty.
Giving Peter Rotten credit for welder mud is a TRAVESTY. EVERYONE knows he was a dragon player lol. No love for Norm.
ns2973
06-15-2011, 04:58 PM
Weird part about this is that I started playing Legacy in some store in NY. It was in a mall. Clifton Park maybe? I got stationed in San Diego about the time they split the lists. There was a lot of animosity toward the northerners, so I just shut my mouth about it. The only thing about the arguing back and forth was the ignoring of Rod's reanimator list that was beating face in San Diego. It's actually the current start of the U/B reanimator thread that's still active 6 or 7 years later.
On a more important topic, when's the rest of the series going up?
Lol i played in those as well, I'm sure we ran into each other.
zalachan
06-16-2011, 03:22 AM
@ Spikey
I drove 8 hours to play the the SCG Dual for Duals in VA back in 2006, just so my UWb Fish deck could get some recognition. Unfortunately, I came in 9th (bad tiebreakers), and many people on the Source still scoffed it off, even with wins against some big names like Alix Hatfield. Shit happens, Legacy used to be elitist. It's not really any better now, with such a big flood of IMPS. Just play the game to enjoy it, and screw the ignoramus who understimate good ideas.
I remember that deck and i liked it on the spot, even though i didn't play blue back then. When someone says fish, my mind says Hanni fish:)
zalachan
06-16-2011, 03:22 AM
@ Spikey
I drove 8 hours to play the the SCG Dual for Duals in VA back in 2006, just so my UWb Fish deck could get some recognition. Unfortunately, I came in 9th (bad tiebreakers), and many people on the Source still scoffed it off, even with wins against some big names like Alix Hatfield. Shit happens, Legacy used to be elitist. It's not really any better now, with such a big flood of IMPS. Just play the game to enjoy it, and screw the ignoramus who understimate good ideas.
I remember that deck and i liked it on the spot, even though i didn't play blue back then. When someone says fish, my mind says Hanni fish:)
Nightmare
06-29-2011, 10:21 AM
Thanks for the comments guys, and for being supportive of the series. It's a lot tougher than I expected to do these (although a lot of that is technical, since the site is blocked at work) so hearing that you're enjoying them is great - even if some of you were there anyway. A few responses, if I may:
@ thunderbluff - as much as the joke was a significant part of the site's history, it's one of those "had to be there" jokes. No one who wasn't there would get it or see the humor, and these aren't really meant for the players who were there (aka guys who have been around that long). I still have a playset of FBB Digeridoos, don't worry.
@ WC/EC drama - here's the thing. This site was started by, and for the most part has been supported by, East coast players. There has always been, up until the point where NoVA and Syracuse players kind of fell off the map, a bias associated with that. To deny it or ignore it is contrary to fact. I've always tried to be conscious of the other metagames for as log as I've been on staff - even when what's-his-face and I were battling across multiple sites I still recognized the contributions of the WC meta. Shit, I beat Rod in top 8 of TML1, it's hard to ignore that. But again, that points to what Hanni said - the best way to get respect is to earn it. And our issue with Hanni was never the deck, butthe attempt to credit him with the Fish archetype, which was and is still incorrect. Whatever, water under the bridge.
The next article is up today, check it out and keep the comments coming!
RogueMTG
06-29-2011, 03:42 PM
Link to Part 4: http://www.channelfireball.com/home/recurring-nightmares-meliorism/
Keep 'em up! These are great :D.
Nightmare
08-17-2011, 06:49 AM
For those of you who don't check the site every day, here's a link to part 5:
http://www.channelfireball.com/home/recurring-nightmares-millenarianism/
Thanks for reading!
Amon Amarth
08-17-2011, 07:37 AM
I really enjoyed this series. Hell, I still remember the confusion I felt when I visited the site after a few days and said to myself "What the fuck do Taurens have to do with anything?!" So good.
I think a lot of people really enjoy the trip down memory lane. It's such a good underdog story. Little-known and underplayed format eventually becomes incredibly popular, bangs the cheerleader, gets rich, etc. and everyone who was there since the beginning feels a sense of satisfaction. Or at least gets to play it regularly.
Michael Keller
08-17-2011, 08:34 AM
I really enjoyed this series. Hell, I still remember the confusion I felt when I visited the site after a few days and said to myself "What the fuck do Taurens have to do with anything?!" So good.
I think a lot of people really enjoy the trip down memory lane. It's such a good underdog story. Little-known and underplayed format eventually becomes incredibly popular, bangs the cheerleader, gets rich, etc. and everyone who was there since the beginning feels a sense of satisfaction. Or at least gets to play it regularly.
+1.
My last round at GP: Chicago was BS. But I loved that deck, it was so good.
chmoddity
08-17-2011, 10:35 AM
Wow! I posted a Merfolk list at some point?
SpatulaOfTheAges
08-17-2011, 11:55 AM
When NOVA players got tired of dealing with the bullshit coming out of New Yorkers we didn't complain, we drove up seven-eight hours to kick their asses and take their money.
QFT.
Not enough NoVa in this article.
Also, no one outside of NY ever thought ATS was anything but adorable.
Hot Karl on the other hand....
Tim the Enchanter
08-17-2011, 02:49 PM
I just read through the whole series and really enjoyed it. While I didn't get to really play Legacy before recently I still thought the format was a lot of fun and really enjoyed it. I started trying to get into the format around GP Columbus and remember pretty much everything that happened since then.
I still remember seeing the Lands list that made T8 Legacy Champs at Gen-Con 2008(?) and thinking that any format where you can play that deck is awesome. Unfortunately I wasn't especially good at Magic at that point and failed to do well with the deck, mostly because I had no idea what half the decks in the meta, looking at you Cephalid Breakfast, did.
Great read. Keep it up.
TheDarkshineKnight
08-17-2011, 10:50 PM
@ thunderbluff - as much as the joke was a significant part of the site's history, it's one of those "had to be there" jokes. No one who wasn't there would get it or see the humor, and these aren't really meant for the players who were there (aka guys who have been around that long). I still have a playset of FBB Digeridoos, don't worry.
One day, Wizards will see it fit to print Anaba Grunt, and on that day many a didgeridoo shall be blown into.
troopatroop
08-22-2011, 06:35 PM
QFT.
Not enough NoVa in this article.
Also, no one outside of NY ever thought ATS was anything but adorable.
Hot Karl on the other hand....
ATS was the most complicated deck in the format, and I played it for 2 years straight as a kid. It scooped to Humility, I remember getting sat down by Nightmare on R/W Rifter. Eternal Witness wasn't always around, and Disenchant hurt! Cartographer and Wood Elves were actually playable, and Quirion Ranger pwned so many kids using Wasteland. I don't care if the deck was always Tier 2, there's nothing more fun than locking kids out turn 4 with Tradewind Rider and Seedborn Muse. I'll never forgive Vengevine for killing Survival of the Fittest on me. What a deck...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.