death
07-02-2011, 01:30 PM
I control The Abyss, Smokestack (+1 counter), Tangle Wire (+4 counters), and Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale on the board. My opponent have 3 Silvergill Adepts and 5 lands.
On my opponent's upkeep there are triggers coming from the 4 cards above that need to be resolved following the APNAP (Active Player - Nonactive Player order) rule:
A - The ability that Tabernacle grants ("pay :1: or destroy this creature") to his creatures triggers. This triggers first because a) it is his turn (Active Player - First Priority) 2) he controls the ability (granted by the Tabernacle) since it is coming from his creatures
B - Nonactive Player (me) receives Second Priority and I choose to put my triggers on the stack in the following manner: Tap 4 for Tangle Wire > Sac 1 perm to Smokestack > Sac 1 nonartifact creature to The Abyss
Upon resolution, triggers resolve in reverse order they were put on the stack (the most recent one at the top resolve first), in effect:
1st - sac 1 creature to The Abyss
2nd - sac 1 permanent to Smokestack
3rd - tap 4 for Tangle Wire
4th - pay :1: for each creature or destroy it
In short, I'm correct right? As the Nonactive Player, I can choose the manner in which triggers are put on the stack for permanents under my control. While an opponent who has active priority cannot alter the sequence in which they will resolve.
For example, they cannot opt to tap for Tangle Wire effects first before sacrificing a permanent for every soot counter on Smokestack. Likewise, they cannot opt to sacrifice a creature to Smokestack first before sacrificing it to The Abyss.
Peace,
death
On my opponent's upkeep there are triggers coming from the 4 cards above that need to be resolved following the APNAP (Active Player - Nonactive Player order) rule:
A - The ability that Tabernacle grants ("pay :1: or destroy this creature") to his creatures triggers. This triggers first because a) it is his turn (Active Player - First Priority) 2) he controls the ability (granted by the Tabernacle) since it is coming from his creatures
B - Nonactive Player (me) receives Second Priority and I choose to put my triggers on the stack in the following manner: Tap 4 for Tangle Wire > Sac 1 perm to Smokestack > Sac 1 nonartifact creature to The Abyss
Upon resolution, triggers resolve in reverse order they were put on the stack (the most recent one at the top resolve first), in effect:
1st - sac 1 creature to The Abyss
2nd - sac 1 permanent to Smokestack
3rd - tap 4 for Tangle Wire
4th - pay :1: for each creature or destroy it
In short, I'm correct right? As the Nonactive Player, I can choose the manner in which triggers are put on the stack for permanents under my control. While an opponent who has active priority cannot alter the sequence in which they will resolve.
For example, they cannot opt to tap for Tangle Wire effects first before sacrificing a permanent for every soot counter on Smokestack. Likewise, they cannot opt to sacrifice a creature to Smokestack first before sacrificing it to The Abyss.
Peace,
death