Michael Keller
07-25-2011, 10:06 AM
I've always been the one to use alternative indicators besides cardboard for tokens in play. However, I was curious as to what is effectively considered "legal" by token standards. For reference, from the Comprehensive Rules:
* 216. Tokens
o 216.1. Some effects put tokens into play. A token is controlled by whoever put it into play and owned by the controller of the spell or ability that created it. (If no player controlled the effect that created it, the token is owned by whoever put it into play.) The spell or ability may define any number of characteristics for the token. This becomes the token's "text." The characteristics defined this way are functionally equivalent to the characteristics that are printed on a card; for example, they define the token's copiable values. A token doesn't have any characteristics not defined by the spell or ability that created it.
+ 216.1a. A spell or ability that creates a creature token sets both its name and its creature type. If the spell or ability doesn't specify the name of the creature token, its name is the same as its creature type(s). A "Goblin Scout creature token," for example, is named "Goblin Scout" and has the creature subtypes Goblin and Scout. Once a token is in play, changing its name doesn't change its creature type, and vice versa.
o 216.2. A token is subject to anything that affects permanents in general or that affects the token’s card type or subtype. A token isn’t a card (even if represented by a card that has a Magic back or that came from a Magic booster pack).
o 216.3. A token in a zone other than the in-play zone ceases to exist. This is a state-based effect. (Note that a token changing zones sets off triggered abilities before the token ceases to exist.) Once a token has left play, it can't be returned to play by any means.
o 216.4 A token that has left play can’t come back into play. If such a token would return to play, it remains in its current zone instead. It ceases to exist the next time state-based effects are checked.
Note there really isn't anything specified as to what can constitute as 'legal' token representation. There is, however, a reference at 216.2 indicating that a token isn't a card, which I am aware of. However, could one use a face-up, unsleeved card as a token indicator (i.e. a face-up Scathe Zombie as a 'Zombie' token)? I know you can use just about anything to represent a token, but I would assume there are instances in larger events where the indication of a token being represented by an unsleeved card that is face-up and in play could be deemed 'unfit' by token standards. I understand it could be at the Head judge's discretion, but are there any rules governing the basic operating procedure regarding tokens and what they can be represented by?
In a nut-shell, is it legal to use a face-up Magic: The Gathering card to represent a token?
Thanks in advance.
* 216. Tokens
o 216.1. Some effects put tokens into play. A token is controlled by whoever put it into play and owned by the controller of the spell or ability that created it. (If no player controlled the effect that created it, the token is owned by whoever put it into play.) The spell or ability may define any number of characteristics for the token. This becomes the token's "text." The characteristics defined this way are functionally equivalent to the characteristics that are printed on a card; for example, they define the token's copiable values. A token doesn't have any characteristics not defined by the spell or ability that created it.
+ 216.1a. A spell or ability that creates a creature token sets both its name and its creature type. If the spell or ability doesn't specify the name of the creature token, its name is the same as its creature type(s). A "Goblin Scout creature token," for example, is named "Goblin Scout" and has the creature subtypes Goblin and Scout. Once a token is in play, changing its name doesn't change its creature type, and vice versa.
o 216.2. A token is subject to anything that affects permanents in general or that affects the token’s card type or subtype. A token isn’t a card (even if represented by a card that has a Magic back or that came from a Magic booster pack).
o 216.3. A token in a zone other than the in-play zone ceases to exist. This is a state-based effect. (Note that a token changing zones sets off triggered abilities before the token ceases to exist.) Once a token has left play, it can't be returned to play by any means.
o 216.4 A token that has left play can’t come back into play. If such a token would return to play, it remains in its current zone instead. It ceases to exist the next time state-based effects are checked.
Note there really isn't anything specified as to what can constitute as 'legal' token representation. There is, however, a reference at 216.2 indicating that a token isn't a card, which I am aware of. However, could one use a face-up, unsleeved card as a token indicator (i.e. a face-up Scathe Zombie as a 'Zombie' token)? I know you can use just about anything to represent a token, but I would assume there are instances in larger events where the indication of a token being represented by an unsleeved card that is face-up and in play could be deemed 'unfit' by token standards. I understand it could be at the Head judge's discretion, but are there any rules governing the basic operating procedure regarding tokens and what they can be represented by?
In a nut-shell, is it legal to use a face-up Magic: The Gathering card to represent a token?
Thanks in advance.