[Article] Philosophy and Practice

[Pinder]

This (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/feature/431) is an article I found on Wizards today, written by 2 level 5 judges, which outlines the hows and whys of Judging, from the judge's perspective. With all the arguments people get into here about rulings, I figured this would be the best place to post it. Give it a read, it's really good.

[cdr]

Understand the Philosophy of PG Section 51 (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=judge/article/20071109a) also went up, and it's much more useful. Not bad for a Scott Marshall piece.

[yawg07]

Understand the Philosophy of PG Section 51 (http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=judge/article/20071109a) also went up, and it's much more useful. Not bad for a Scott Marshall piece.

Now, see? That was very helpful. I knew all of those except the trample damage thing.
That is actually pretty important sometimes.

[Goaswerfraiejen]

Ugh, why do people insist on using "philosophy" as a buzzword for "belief" or "reason/ing"? Definitely one of my pet peeves. Besides, I thought there would actually be a link between philosophy and Magic that would be expounded in the article.


Putting that horrible misuse of a word aside, the articles are indeed fairly informative; thanks for pointing them out.