Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Just a heads-up, the deck looks very fun (planeswalkers!), going to build this in MWS and give it a spin!
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
I just knew Jace would show up, and it's no surprise that it would be some sort of Landstillish / control deck.
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
I'm glad Ancestral Vision is finally getting some respect in Legacy.
I consider it one of the top 5 draw spells in the format.
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
the whole 2cc not being good is true to an extent.
but ... you're playing fire/ice and you're not playing goyf.
i understand the color considerations here, but why no brainstorm, is ancestral visions > brainstorm in your mind?
i would almost rather run threads of disloyalty over forbid.
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Pft... not Ultimate planeswalker till you wish in Nicol Bolas :cool:
This deck works? Seems kinda slow though, compared to how fast zoo and other tribal are these days, makes me nervous seeing no board swipe @.@ White & zero WoG?
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
The draw seems a bit slow. Have you guys tested against heavy discard?
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bowvamp
The draw seems a bit slow. Have you guys tested against heavy discard?
Since when has heavy discard ever been a relevant concern for the legacy metagame? The most discard you'll be likely to ever face is thoughtseize + hymn, which is from only a couple decks barely anybody plays. You may get therapied occasionally, but that's not huge either. When seeing something as slow, I'd look first to see how it does versus things that want to out tempo you.
Also, there's probably not much point in asking questions until the matchups are written, since that will probably answer a lot of questions (And raise new ones) :P
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Although this "pile" looks a bit random, I really like the approach.
We had a long debate about the format sucking because it's dominated by Counter-Top-Goyf and how it spoils the fun. That's why maindeck Spell Snare is necessary because the most dangerous threats are still in the CC2 slot.
Ancestral Visions also seem to be strange, but since I have played Kadaj's MUC some time ago, I could really see they are the more efficient carddraw in compairison with Standstill.
Which leads to your first point of your primer which I really agree with: Standstill is the most situational carddraw in the Legacy format.
There are too many situations where you'd be stupid as hell to play it (Ather Vial, sometimes Nimble Mongoose). In some occasions, you can also get blown out of the water if the opponent is also playing a lot of manlands or Decree of Justice.
But pretty nice writeup, this deck definitely has got my attention now (especially now that you've cut Dazes ;-) ).
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Yea, I do look forward to reading about it. I like the strategy locking people out with elspeth, draw, and counters. I can see how it shuts down late game, looks like the hardest part is holding them off till you get get those 4cc game winners out and just plain drawing them on top of that. Ancestral vision's an awesome spell on turn 5.. but only if you're still alive by then. Still I can't wait to hear more :)
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
No goyf or tops? I like it!
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
What is the reasoning behind the lack of Brainstorms?
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
I took this deck out for a spin on MWS and I want to say that it really wtf pwnes zoo. The games took forever, but I either killed everything he played via swords or recurring EE, or I got out the crucible and stuck him on 2 basics while I had 2 spell snare. I really like the deck, great job on it and the primer!
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Very interesting deck. I like it. It breaks the symmetry of sweepers, and the walkers are very flexible. I'm not accustomed to red in pure control, so that was a nice surprise.
Please tell me more about your thoughts on Brainstorm and Top. I realize you only have so much room, but Brainstorm does look pretty strong in this deck, especially if you happen to have multiples of walkers. As for Top, I think a singleton wouldn't be a bad idea to test, as it avoids diminishing returns and remains pretty powerful.
peace,
4eak
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
The approach of building a deck resistant to Spell Snare and Counterbalance makes a lot of sense. I like it.
However, something's not right.
If you want to be immune to Counterbalance, which is why you don't want to run Standstill, why would you run Ancestral Vision? :confused: It's 0 mana, so if your opponent has counterbalance, all they need to do is flip a land and your draw spell is countered. Unless I'm mistaken, most CB decks run more lands in their deck than 2 cc spells.
Also, by changing the mana curve of the deck to be immune to Counterbalance, and using the 3cc Forbid as a counterspell, doesn't that invite the deck to be more vulnerable to Daze? Or Stifle on your Ancestral Vision? EDIT: Wouldn't Fact or Fiction be better at dodging CB, but then again it doesn't help your mana curve problem.
EDIT: I took another look at the final list. 22 land + 2 Tolaria West =does/not= 24 land. Also take into account the list contains SIX colorless lands. How do you beat decks like Tempo Thresh, Eva Green/Team America? Resolve Crucible at all costs? I think that's a longshot.
Overall, I feel like Ultimate Walker sacrifices too much in order to minimize one specific weakness, Counterbalance (and Spell Snare), and what it sacrifices are actually the basic core principles of a control deck, which is to have a stable manabase, and be able to cast and protect your spells. Actually, I'll take that back since you run Spell Snare (and Fire/Ice), but still, the manabase is shaky, and the deck has a high mana curve that makes all of your plays clunky.
Yeah, you resist Spell Snare/CB with Forbid, but you also weaken your ability to protect your bombs when you play them.
In conclusion, I actually like the deck, but someone's gotta ask the tough questions. Good luck in developing the deck!
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
I would add Moats and Humilities. 2 of each I think.
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
Personally, I like the deck, but honestly I think the deck is far from optimized. Some card choices are just not justifiable. Here're some that I see and argue against:
The 22 lands with 2 West is cute, but if you refer to landstill lists that test heavily, Tolaria West should never be included as a landdrop since it's a horrible Landdrop and should only count towards the "24th" land drop like EDragon. Your deck is heavy on the 4-drop and you should be happy that you have been hitting landdrops consistently. Even in basic-heavy Landstill builds, reaching 4 mana is a little hard in a meta of wastes/stifles/sinkhole. 22 Lands + 2 Tolaria West just does not cut to it. West is cute with Visions, but ultimately, Visions is too situational.
There was a thread with Visions v.s. Standstill a few months back on the source and there's a conclusion that both were situational cards, with Visions being "worse" in a sense that at the very least, you play Standstill ONLY if you have board or card position. No one is going to drop a Standstill against Vial. The very most risky play is to drop Standstill against Bob, and this is possible, but is dependent on the cards in your hand and against certain versions of bob.dec. The many points raised in the thread include:
Visions resolves, you draw 3 cards. Visions isn't situational on the board while Standstill is. If you have board position, then Standstill > Visions because it's a better topdeck and gives you cards or lets you sculpt your hand while they do not crack Standstill. Regardless, you're earning in the end. However, Visions fall under a ton of even more situational scenarios. If you drop Visions and I resolve a Standstill, you're going to cry as suspend is not a "may" resoluation. If you drop Vision and Countertop gets through, that's another problem. Visions is prone to Sprites, and also the suspending turns allow your opponent to build up cards to counter it. 4 Turns to find an answer isn't hard, and it's almost as situational as Standstill. I think that saying Standstill is susceptible to Snares and CB is true, but it's not an argument to excludes its utility since Goyfs are susceptible to Snares and CB. Your argument must be tailored to why Visions is better in your deck. You've laid certain points and they're valid since Visions feed Forbid, but so does Standstill (which happens to net Ancestrall Recall CA as well). Visions is better in your deck because you can Tolaria West tutor for it but what are the situations where you will tutor for Visions and let it resolve in 4 turns? When you're winning more of course! What happens when you are getting beaten in the face? You would more than likely tutor EE or play that land tapped to get more mana to play planeswalker/removal.
As a big lover of Landstill, I don't like the arguments that you propose against Standstill. It's the most situational draw that's true, but the deck is tailored to abuse it the most. We are seeing Landstill playing 3 instead of 4 Standstills but that's because of the meta shifting to vial decks (merfolks). However, recent Landstill builds have much better matchups against Folks with a good board plan, as well as knowing the deck better. For instance, dropping to 2 Standstill is great on the draw agains Merfolks after you lost game 1 since you won't get them early, and you can land it later after you've reset the board with EE/Disk/Wrath.
I cannot justify the lack of Brainstorm. There's a reason why it's restricted in Vintage despite the format having so much filtering power. Brainstorm is in par with Recall in terms of card knowledge (not card advantage) and is one of the biggest spells for a control deck to dig for answers. The only reason why I see you not running Brainstorm is because you run 3 Jace, but Jace is board dependent. He does detract attention from you when creatures swing to him, but then he just becomes a bad 1UU draw a card whereas you could have had a U: Draw 3 cards and dig for answers against a board.
I understand how this deck made T8 in the meta. It's a good deck, but I think it's unoptimized and not running Brainstorm or focusing too much on Visions is not too good. Perhaps you didn't run into decks that disrupted your manabase, or had Top/Standstill against Visions. In every way, Fact or Fiction >>> visions, but I think you can't run those since your curve is already very high. I do like Forbid over Counterspell and might consider it in Landstill myself, but in all honesty, Forbid <<< Counterspell or even negate if you're faced against Tempo Thresh/TA/Eva/waste.dec/stifle.dec. This deck is strong because it plays a group of permanents that Legacy is not experienced with i.e. Planeswalker. I do like how you manage to use Vengeant to its fullest in Legacy, but I think he's at best the 3rd best Planeswalker, and he's good to a large extent only because REB/Pyroblast in the board is larger than blue in this format.
Hope this is a civil discussion and contribution to this thread. Just curious though, is this deck considered to be established with only one tournament result and no deep discussions at all?
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
This is a really nice anti-CB-Goyf list. It makes Spell Snare next to useless and significantly weakens CounterTop. Its value is very strong in metas that are heavy in the Goyf-CBTop engine. It's probably less strong in metas that are Landstill heavy.
I suspect that it'll stay strong as long as CounterTop is the primary blue archetype in play. It'll be interesting to see how it does if Landstill continues its resurgence and begins to overtake CounterTop in the played lists.
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
- How the hell does this deck not play Brainstorm?
- Why do you run only 3 Factory?
- What makes Ancestral Visions any good? Control is all about surviving the early game and gaining position later on. AV hits way too late for that to have any effect. The card is almost dead against anything aggro-ish.
- What justifies Fire//Ice over other spot removal? Why won't you run PtE main?
- Forbid seems like a card that's either a 3CC counter with no benefit, or a complete overkill. Is this card really that useful, and can't you win the games you win on it anyway?
Re: [Deck] Ultimate Walker
I tried this out on mws and got murdered by goblins. I think you could use a few more sweepers main.