Printable View
Regarding Empty and discard: Planning to Empty gives your opponent more ways to interact, which further taxes your discard. When going for Tendrils, you often have a clear choice to select with Cabal Therapy (blind). With Empty, you might try to play around counter magic and want to strip a Golgari Charm, Explosives, etc. Theoretical but possibly a factor.
Empty actually favours Duress, as does the current meta in general. Cabal Therapy is obviously the more powerful card (it hits multiples, it hits creatures), but Cabal Therapy lives off information. In the past, and in some matchups still, it was/is not only reasonable but beneficial to hold onto your discard spells until later in the game, but currently, you are usually pressured to use them early. It is more important to hit at all than to hit all copies of a single card. Especially against decks like Aggro Loam and Eldrazi, you can't tell which of their hate pieces they have drawn without Gitaxian Probe, so it's better to go with the more reliable option. Empty only amplifies this effect by giving you shorter windows of reasonable combo turns as opposed to additional copies of Tendrils, Past in Flames or even Ad Nauseam.
Unless you're a Jedi Master of course, in which case you should just run Therapy.
What do you think of my point Jonathan? Your comment is partially meta dependent. I don't play mtgo and almost exclusively at my lgs.
I think what you said falls under "it's important to hit". Empty is susceptible to different forms of interaction than the other business spells, which makes it harder to make proper reads and thus more reliable to go with Duress.
(I kinda feel like this sounds condescending, definitely not intended. Should have put more effort into my earlier post, including quoting yours and making clear what I meant.)
Not at all. Thanks.
Back in the Established Decks forum. :smile:
/back among classic decks like Oozing, Burn, and Pox
Fiddlesticks and fudgesicles. Time for damage control?Quote:
Originally Posted by CabalTherapy
Revamping my sideboard again after a couple of losses to Eldrazi and Reanimator last weekend. Went 1-2 out of three rounds. I won game 2 against the Eldrazi, which was nice, and makes me feel more that the matchup isn't as hideous as it first appeared if we a) prepare for it and b) win the die-roll. I also 2-0'd Infect, which 0-2'd me last time I played the guy, so maybe I'm not totally Bad at Magic. Reanimator was pretty bad, though.
In light of last week's results, I've been thinking more and more that a second Empty the Warrens and the singleton KGrip are dead space in the sideboard, and that I might need either a second Rebuild or some form of graveyard hate. Or both, for that matter.
The only change I've made to my maindeck in a long time—aside from the continued rotation of an Empty and Dark Petition #2—was to replace Preordain #2 with a Chain of Vapor. It hasn't come up once, so no word on how that's affecting things. I'll get back with more info after the next time I take the deck for a spin.
I feel like Preordain is extremely clunky, and like I can't find a discard when I need it most. That's gotten me thinking that it'd be great if we could go up to eight disruption cards, but I don't have the experience with the deck to determine how much that would hamstring our whole gameplan. Bear in mind that I've only recently brought in the seventh piece of disruption again (the Chain of Vapor). Has anyone tried eight lately?
I'm also considering going to a 3-3 split between Therapy and Duress, but I'm still unsure how important that is or whether it'll yield appreciable benefits. I don't feel like I've noticed a problem with 4x Therapy that more Duresses would solve all that often, primarily because I've been firing successful Therapies that revealed redundant hate (e.g., a Chalice and a Thorn or Surgical and Force and [generic blue card]). Our chances of breaking through against either of those (plus a clock) are slim and none, and if our opponent knows what he/she is doing, Slim will have left town. Hatebears are a real problem that Duress can't answer, which was one of the reasons I decided to maindeck the Chain.
Here's hoping we can get back into the DTBs. Let's face it: this deck is a lot of fun, and I'm not interested in seeing it get blown out.
I feel like Chain main is a miserable move. Wasn't it already discussed some pages ago that is has so many obvious downsides and doesn't support the game plan at all. I guess there is a little step left for someone to ask about Izzet Charm and friends. Chances are high that you'll draw it and not need it more often than really searching for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
I don't see how Preordain is "clunky". It's a cc1 cantrip that is faster than SDT and comparable to Ponder but selects better: you should find you discard spells easily. 6 are enough right now and I see your point on the Therapy vs. Duress problem. I have been playing with a 3-3 for quite a while before replacing one Duress with Thoughtseize, which is the best discard spell. Regarding counterspells, it's important to hit safely and presumably you might win after one hit in the current state of the format. Duress also takes down Eldrazi better than a blind CT.
Ah, and I of course, hope we stay here in this forum. We don't need to be in the DTB section to know that ANT is still the best deck.
So why not cutting Preordain for Abrupt Decay...will solve our worst problem : Counterbalance and Chalice Of The Void.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
Just top8'ed a tournament of 47 people, pretty standard decklist : 2 Pif 1 ToA 1 EtW maindeck...lost during swiss Eldrazi, top 8 lost against Eldrazi one more time (4x Decay and 2x Hurkyl's is not enough!!). 4 Eldrazi in top8....LOL! Time to ban Chalice? In vintage is restricted...
That's true, but I feel like one has the same problem if one draws Duress/Therapy against a permanent-heavy deck that's already deployed a threat. I've had a whole lot of game 1s in which people run out a Thalia or a Sphere of Resistance while I'm still monkeying around trying to find business, and I don't have an answer. Having something to bounce a hate permanent (or a gamebreaker like Marit Lage) feels like a really important thing, and Chain does some other nasty stuff with mana rocks on the board. This actually came up twice yesterday (worked once; my tutor got countered the second time, which another Duress might've solved). Not sure I'll keep it in (more on that in a minute), but it's a pretty useful trick in a lot of matchups. Obviously not universally good, but I've been yanking the Preordain it replaced in nearly every game 2 for a sideboard card, so I thought I'd replace it with a 1-costed card that comes in a lot of the time and solves much of the problem with game-1 permanent hate (excluding Chalice).Quote:
Originally Posted by CabalTherapy
I've been cantripping into a bunch of cantrips quite a bit lately. Oftentimes we either need to deal with a problem that'll zero us within a couple of turns or get the combo going right away; Preordain does neither of these things well. This has led me to believe that we're running too many cantrips, but there's no way I'm cutting a copy of Brainstorm or Ponder from the maindeck. Probe is useful for different reasons, and I don't think that's a card to cut either. The bang-for-buck factor on Preordain is the lowest out of all the cantrips in the deck, and I find that when I draw it after the first two turns, I'd rather have either business (five spells here already), mana (nine rituals and eight artifacts), or disruption.Quote:
Originally Posted by CabalTherapy
So when I say it's clunky, I don't mean that it's overcosted or that it's inherently slow; I mean that, of all the cards we use to find business/mana/disruption, it does the least, and I feel like we'd be better served to shore up one of those three components of the deck than to keep 2x Preordain.
I may not be approaching this properly, but again, I've sided out the Preordains for virtually all my G2s and G3s, and rarely has it been useful in G1.
I've been kicking around bringing back the third Duress instead of the Chain and going back to seven discards. I'm curious: do you feel like seven pieces of disruption in the maindeck has been a setup that's led to flooding? I used to think that because there were times when it would happen, but I feel like we're in an environment in which there are decks that'll just shut us out of the game immediately if we can't land a discard right away. Chain obviously doesn't solve this problem, but I felt like testing maindeck anti-permanent stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by CabalTherapy
I'm definitely keeping two Chains in the 75, whether split between main and sideboard or both in the side. It's so crushing when it works (which has been often, in my experience) and so versatile against a variety of matchups that I definitely think we need to keep two around. The fact that it builds storm count and removes problem permanents (Canonist, Germ tokens wielding Batterskulls, Reanimate targets) at the same time is superb.
CabalTherapy, thanks a lot for your input. I'm interested to hear what you think about adding discards at the moment/why we shouldn't, and I'll probably put Chain back in the 'board after its underperformance yesterday. Felt too narrow for the matchups I faced, though it would've been great in the matchups I had last week (barring Eldrazi).
First of all, well done!Quote:
Originally Posted by Alakhai84
To answer your question, I'm not a fan of Abrupt Decay in very many matchups at all. Green mana is a real choke that we won't be able to solve in the face of a number of decks, and unless we're in a slower matchup I think it'll really slow us down to have one in our opener.
It might be a necessity against Eldrazi because it can't be countered, but I don't think we should be putting in more than one or two. The Eldrazi player yesterday won game 2 by playing Chalice on 0, Chalice on 1, Chalice on 2, and Rest in Peace over the first three turns.
On an unrelated note, I just saw this list today: http://mtgtop8.com/event?e=12113&d=269470&f=LE
Your thoughts, everyone?
http://mythicspoiler.com/soi/cards/p...fthepuzzle.jpg
btw. how is it going in this department? anyone actually tried to build it?
Man plan????Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
I've had some success with it on Magic Online. In Limited.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloshthedark
I'm going to play a list with 4 tonight in a weekly tournament. I'll report back with results. In testing it's been good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloshthedark
Quote:
Originally Posted by phazonmutant
what did you cut?
Well that depends on what list you start with! :wink: How about I just copy my deck?Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasDowd
1 Island
3 Scalding Tarn
1 Bloodstained Mire
4 Polluted Delta
1 Swamp
1 Tropical Island
2 Underground Sea
1 Volcanic Island
1 Badlands
4 Gitaxian Probe
4 Brainstorm
4 Ponder
4 Pieces of the Puzzle
3 Cabal Therapy
3 Duress
4 Dark Ritual
4 Cabal Ritual
4 Lion's Eye Diamond
2 Lotus Petal
4 Infernal Tutor
2 Past in Flames
1 Empty the Warrens
2 Tendrils of Agony
// Sideboard:
1 Bayou
4 Abrupt Decay
1 Hurkyl's Recall
2 Dread of Night
2 Flusterstorm
2 Sensei's Divining Top
2 Surgical Extraction
1 Xantid Swarm
Overall the deck felt solid, but mayyyybe 4 Pieces of the Puzzle was excessive, but it was a solid card to draw one of. It warranted a Force from RUG Delver, and won the other game it resolved. Solid there. Round 2 I played against Miracles where it also warranted a Force once and was a great top-deck later. Round 3 against Painter, game 1 it would have been an insane draw, game 2 I crushed him before it was relevant, and game 3 he had kind of a nut draw against my somewhat slow draw. Round 4 I played against TinFins and it was garbage.
Overall I'd cut 1-2 for a Petal and a Top. But when I cast it, it was amazing. Would recommend.
Bonus! You can see me play it against RUG here: https://www.twitch.tv/cardkingdom/v/61488050 (game starts around 5 minutes)
So you actually more focused on turn 4 combo out ? Is it sometimes too slow vs for example Elves ? I watched your matches - not great examples:
G1 Free win - opponent keep 5 lander + brainstorm on draw. Turn 1 duress was enough.
G2 He had Zoo hand vs messy hand with Tendrils which you wanted to recast but he topdeck surgical with library (really library... in g2)
G3 opponent side out Spell Snares ==' and keep non lander n/c.
Interesting thing did you tested Chrome Moxes in your build - I like puzzle gives very fast threshold but this 3 cmc is killer. Also not having Ad N is a mistake what if you met other combo where you need to race.
You're right, the match vs RUG was not very representative. I think that the turn 2 Pieces was a good showcase of how it can be used to set up turn 3, but correct this is a Grinding Station build that can go toe-to-toe in the late game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatal
Chrome Mox is interesting. Maybe it's better than some Petals?
Not having Ad Naus is definitely not a mistake. I've been hating it even in the combo mirror with a full playset of Lotus Petal because it encourages high-variance plays. You'll notice I have 4-5 combo hate cards in the sideboard (Surgical, Fluster, Xantid), and they have always been consistently better for me than Ad Naus. Ad Naus in the board would require adding in Lotus Petals, which I don't think go well with Grinding Station in general.
"High variance plays" are not necessarily a bad thing, especially in matchups that come down to goldfishing anyway. 80% to win on turn two can be a lot better than 100% to win on turn three. Not having Ad Nauseam definitely hurts in non-Force of Will combo mirrors.
Pieces does restock your hand and helps with gaining the CA lost from Chrommox. Sounds interesting. Is a build with ancient tombs too cute...
As awesome as that sounds, it might be a little too hard on the colors to run Ancient Tomb.
Phazonmutant:
Do you whiff a lot with Pieces? I'm running it in a different combo deck with 35 Instants and Sorceries and I get only 1 card off it quite a few times.
I don't think that there is a higher philosophy to discard spells but I feel like 6 with 2 Pif main are a decent set up. As Jonathan Alexander pointed out some pages ago, format switched to a rather permanent based fight with less counterspells over the course of the last months. There are more non-U MUs and there we generally don't need discard spells but more juice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
Thank you for the response!Quote:
Originally Posted by CabalTherapy
Do you feel similarly about a six-count in builds running Dark Petition instead of double-PiF? For the time being, I've gone back to six discards, and I'll try a 3-3 split next time I bring the deck out. Seven discards felt like it flooded. Back to two Preordains for the time being:rolleyes:
Some time ago, someone mentioned using Personal Tutor. Is anyone still working with that card? What spot in the deck did it fill?
I hit one spell once, but never straight whiffed. I have 39 hits, a few more than you. Running the math: I'm assuming that it takes 3 non-spells to cast Pieces and Pieces itself, so we can exclude those 4 from the deck population to approximate proportions of success to population size in an actual game.Quote:
Originally Posted by .Ix
Population (N): 56 (60 - 3 lands - 1 Pieces)
Successes (K): 38 (39 spells - 1 Pieces)
Sample Size (n): 5
Successes in Sample (k): 1
P(X <= k = 1) = 0.03268
For K=34
P(X <= k) = 0.07200
So 39 spells is about a 96.7% chance to hit 2 or more spells, whereas 35 spells is 92.8%.
It's that time again, I'll be researching, playtesting, and updating the guide in the weeks to come. Best of luck in your matches everyone, and may the storm count be ever in your favor.
Played 3 Pieces tonight against Shardless, 4c control brew with Thing in the Ice, Burn and Esper Mentor ... none of these deck play Daze, so theoreticaly all 3 U are perfect MUs for the tech, all my opponents respected the card - I had it discarded or countered EVERY time I (could) cast it (roughly 10 times), if countered I haven't advanced my gameplan at all, felt pretty bad, lost 1 game because I couldn't cast or get rid of it, it forced weird cantripping (3 lands instead of more effective plays), I haven't had the guts to DR into Pieces in the dark if that should be a standard play I'm not interested anyway... overall I felt more manascrewed than usual, I could imagine it as omnipotent topdeck on 5 lands, unfortunately wasn't the case... generally it went as I thought it would, just no Daze got involved, too expensive, too sorcery and U on the top of it
Eff we got moved to the slums. That's probably good though because people are more likely to be unprepared. This deck is actually one of the best right now IMO.
I am afraid, I cannot help here: I never played Dark Petition, thus it's for other people to evaluate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
If you run Petitions, that's because you don't expect to face much countermagic in the first place. Wouldn't make much sense to run heavy disruption maindeck then. Although I liked my Dark Petition list with four extra sideboard discard spells to go up to ten against Miracles and in combo mirrors.
How much of a difference do you think there really is between running Petition and running 2x PiF? I ask because I find that oftentimes it doesn't feel like it matters which card I have in hand; they either don't have enough to stop me, or their hand is totally stacked. I lost to BUG Delver Sunday because in game 3 he was sitting on three untapped lands with a hand of Clique, Force of Will, Flusterstorm, 2x Stifle, and some other irrelevant stuff. Wouldn't have mattered which config I was running; beating four counterspells and a clock feels pretty much impossible for our deck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander
Feels like I've started to have a lot of unwinnable matchups in my meta, but that could just be that it's a small enough meta that people will board against my deck rather readily. There's still a whole lot of blue control floating around, as well. Getting a bit discouraged, so I might mix it up and play something else next time.
With Petition, you tend to run Ad Nauseam. Petition is a much better flip than Past in Flames, because it can be LED or Tutor (or both), depending on what you need/have. I think the biggest difference outside of Ad Nauseam (or at least most noticeable for me) is the lack of extra Storm spells. Not having the second Tendrils can be really annoying.
When I tested 2 Past / 2 Tendrils / 1 Petition, I never noticed a difference between that and clean 2/3.
Are you a proponent of running additional business over Ad Nauseam at this point? I like having the AdN in my maindeck, but I'm starting to sour on playing this deck without more answers to countermagic than I'm finding right now, and AdN doesn't help there. Currently I'm running singletons of AdN, Petition, Empty, PiF, and Tendrils.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander
Have you tested with singletons AdN, Petition, Tendrils, and 2 PiF? I've been feeling more and more like I've been banking too heavily on hands that look like they could develop into a quick Empty but that never do. I used to run two Petitions maindeck (the other one's in my 'board), but I think the players in my meta have stepped up their blue game. I'm not taking last week's experience to be evidential (that god-hand from BUG Delver; also, there were only three rounds and I had a bye), but I am starting to feel like the increase in resilience of a second PiF would be better than the speed of maindeck Empty or the flexibility of a second Petition.
Here's hoping this weekend doesn't herald any opponents' drawing 2x Stifle, 2x Flusterstorm, Delver, Island, Force...
I played in a GPT today and had the pleasure to play 2 PIF, 2 Tendrils, 1 Grim, and 1 Empty because the store let me borrow their Grim Tutor (pretty nice). AN was in my side board.
One of my opponents was on RUG and had a hand of 3 FOW, 2 Stifle, Daze. He Forced my 2 CTs and so his hand was FOW / Stifle, which I baited out with an Empty and then blew him out with a gazillion Tendrils via PIF on the same turn. So much mana! I felt like I was constantly discarding tutors, PIF, and Tendrils with my LEDs. Maybe luck but it was fun.
That was me. It's good. I ran it with 0 Dark Petition, 1 Tendrils, 1 PIF, 1 Empty. That said, I think the metagame is pretty horrible right now for storm, and for 1-mana cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
Thanks for the feedback!Quote:
Originally Posted by thefringthing
Agreed on the 1-mana thing (and the meta in general), but I've been looking for an alternative to Dark Petition or Preordain lately. Petition's worked out pretty well for me, but it's a bit difficult to parlay a Petition into a fast Empty, so I've moved Empty back to the 'board for now because I've been liking the fifth tutor. Still really dislike Preordain, but I'm learning to live with a singleton in the absence of something better.
Have you noticed any distinct advantages or disadvantages to running Personal Tutor? Obviously it requires cantrips to fire immediately and it can't find AdN, but I'm wondering how often those problems arise and whether Personal Tutor's advantages (mana cost, primarily) have outweighed the difficulties.
No tournament last Sunday, but I got to practice against Eldrazi, and it went better than expected. Came out close to a tie after 5+ games.
I've been running an unorthodox setup lately: 2 PiF and singletons Tendrils, AdN, Petition, Preordain, Chrome Mox, Rain of Filth. 14 lands (Tropical in the 'board), 3-3 Duress to Therapy. Singletons of Petition and Empty in the sideboard.
I'm not missing the second Petition too much, but I need to play the deck more to see how flexible the list is with only 4-5 tutors. I don't like having more than one piece of business in the 'board, so I may just run without the second Petition. Seems like an upgrade over the second PiF against non-blue decks, though. Of course, so is Empty, but Empty's pretty bad in a lot of matchups where another tutor would help (Elves, Gobbos, anything with Ensnaring Bridge).
I've also been toying with the idea of running a second Tendrils in the board, but I'm still having trouble wrapping my head around how exactly that would help us. Feels like it just reduces flexibility compared with a tutor and reduces resilience compared with PiF. Not trolling; I'd appreciate any observations or pointers people could give me. Could be that I'm just bad at Magic, but I feel like a minimum of five tutors is pretty important for the deck's consistency and flexibility.
I'm not getting a strong feeling for how useful the Mox is. It bailed me out once, but I still get cantrip-flooded and have trouble finding a discard when I need it. The discard problem might be solved by PiF, but I'm not sure yet because I wasn't battling blue. I like Rain a lot, but it seems like a lot of people have been replacing it with the Mox lately for AdN and other fast starts. I also feel like Rain has been extremely helpful for stopping soft-counters and reaching Threshold. Anyone else running both cards?
Thanks in advance for any feedback, everybody!
@Ronald Deuce, how do you SB vs Eldrazi? What wasEldrazi's list? What were the scenarios of games you won and lost?
Also interested in the details about the Eldrazi.
I've been running a chrome mox as well, and I share your distaste for preordains, so I know the feeling. I'm currently running one PiF, one ToA in the main, but an extra of each in the board. The second tendrils helps you have more business against decks where you have a little time to set up, and it's nice that sometime you can fire off a tendrils that isn't lethal, but gives you time to work up to a second one. Also, it's nice when you can get a decent amount of mana but not much storm, or grave hate stops you from going the PiF route.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OlegtheSuper
For quick reference, here's what I played: standard skeleton with 14 lands; 6 discards; 2 PiF; 1 Preordain, Mox, Rain, AdN, Petition, Tendrils. 4x Decay, 2x Hurkyll's, 1x Rebuild, Trop, Empty, and Petition (among other things) in the sideboard.Quote:
Originally Posted by taconaut
Opponent was running a blue-white list, with Drowner of Hope, Skyspawner, 8 lock pieces in the 75 (Chalices and Thorns), and at least 2 Mindbreak Traps in the 'board. It looked like it was less strong against us than colorless lists with 10-12 lock pieces, but like it might be better against more creaturey decks like D&T. Eldrazi Spawn have been wreaking havoc on me when I play Dredge, too, though it's possible to get around that. Didn't see any Wastelands that I can remember.
For G2, I boarded in 2x Hurkyl's, 1x Rebuild, Abrupt Decay, Tropical. Took out 3 Cabal Therapy, 1 Preordain, 1 PiF (I think). Subsequently I also added Empty in exchange for (I think) Rain of Filth. In the future, I might try to side a tad lighter and keep a Therapy or replace Rebuild with another Hurkyl's or a Decay.
I didn't take notes and a couple of the games weren't particularly memorable (either fast lock shut me out or he didn't find the pieces before a combo), but I'll try to remember as much as I can.
I won two games off of Ad Nauseam. If the Eldrazi player doesn't drop a T1 lock-piece or swing out quickly, we can get where we need to be with little trouble using it, and it's a great tutor target if we only have one Ritual to go with our mana rocks. It also can't be countered by Warping Wail, though I've never had trouble with that card because Eldrazi taps out pretty much every turn. AdN loses a great deal of effectiveness with every turn we don't use it, but it's saved me several times against the Eldrazi after taking me down to 1 life, including once yesterday.
I lost my opening game after keeping a strong hand. Had two or three Cabal Rituals, an LED, and a tutor. Trouble was that the opponent dropped two Thorns and no Chalices, so I didn't really have plays after that.
Another game I lost because my opponent had a Mindbreak Trap and I couldn't find a discard. Had an easy combo in hand and went through about four cantrips in the final turn looking for Duress, but he'd built up his board, so he just swung for the fences.
Surprisingly, I didn't see a double-Chalice opening at all that day.
So here's what I've been thinking about the matchup lately:
—AdN is great in this matchup if you can fire it quickly. They don't have instant-speed damage—at least, not without Endbringer, which I didn't see—so we can afford to drop to 1 if absolutely necessary to find a kill.
—Rebuild is a bit of a lemon. It's great against Chalices, but it's really bad against Thorns. I'm probably switching it out.
—Hurkyl's Recall is excellent, but it didn't come up much the other day. I think I drew one in a game in which there was a Thorn on the board, and I just didn't have/draw the lands to cast it. I don't think we should take these out, though; we're gonna have to live with those lock-pieces, and Recall can wipe their hate while getting around Chalice on 1 but without having a base cost of 3. Not sure whether three Recalls would be better than two, but I'd like to try a third one for the time being.
—Running 15 lands is important against Eldrazi, though I don't tend to like it against decks without Wasteland. Opens up Abrupt Decay (not the greatest, but it's something) and makes it easier to work around Thorn, but does these things at the cost of making our topdecks worse.
—I've been hurting for another discard spell in this matchup. T1 Duress on the play is often all we need to stop them from doing anything meaningful against us. I still like the fact that Therapy can take multiples, though. Not sure whether I'd run a fourth Duress or Therapy, especially because at least some of the discards are probably getting sided out for other forms of disruption.
—Empty never came up. Not sure why; I think in one game I had a choice between Empty and AdN and I picked AdN because I didn't have the storm for a big Empty or the opponent already had a solid board. Empty has worked in the past, though, and it's faster than Petition, so I think one is pretty important for this matchup. Not sure how much the Scion-heavy builds will reduce its effectiveness, so pending further discussion I'm not totally on board with running multiples.
—Thorn of Amethyst is really, really bad. I've had significantly fewer problems with Chalice than I've had with Thorn. Getting locked out of 1- or 2-costed cards is abysmal, but it requires more than one Chalice to seal us in. A single Thorn makes everything we do worse, and we're light enough on lands that it's really tough to get around it without breaking our rocks. (It's for this reason that I'm very reluctant to board out any copies of Petal.) There's also the fact that—good as it is against Thalia in D&T/Mav—Chain of Vapor is pretty much dead against Thorn in this matchup because of Chalice. I'm interested to hear what (if anything) you guys think is best against Thorn because it's really, really savage.
Nevilshute, enjoying your latest set of League videos. Keep 'em coming! Sorry about how disappointing the Eldrazi match was, but I found it really helpful to watch. I found your using additional Empties against Eldrazi to be an interesting choice. Have you found running additional Empties to give you better odds than running Recalls, etc.? Couldn't tell whether you were saying in the vid that Hurkyll's was worse or that you just wanted to try multiple Empties. I feel like comparing the odds of having Hurkyll's but not being able to use it/getting it Thought-Knazi'd to the odds of flooding on business is the best measure, but I'm curious as to what you think. Also, I think Ad Nauseam is more useful in this matchup than additional Empties would be, but I don't think I have enough experience to make that call. You could try running Empty in place of Grim Tutor. I feel like we can't really mix Grim and AdN, and AdN has saved me an inordinate number of times against Eldrazi.
Thanks for the feedback! Sounds similar to what I'd had in mind; maybe it's not making as much sense as it should because I haven't played it out myself. Are you running Rain of Filth?Quote:
Originally Posted by taconaut
I believe that ingot chewer is the best card vs both chalice and thorn - the problem - is anti ad nauseam, but hey! thats a TES problem... you explode much more the PiF engine...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce
Any links to videos of ANT defeating Eldrazi?
Went 2-2 at my local last night with both losses to the menace.