Originally Posted by
CaptainTwiddle
After playing a few more matches, I was considering swapping the Maggot for a DRS as well. I'm not sure if the concerns about the lack of GSZ making Explorer less consistent and therefore making the high end of the deck unreachable are really accurate. GSZ lets you tap out on turn 2 to get an Explorer into play. In that scenario, I could have cast Oath of Nissa on turn 1 to find an Explorer and then turn two I can get the Explorer into play and still have a mana open (possibly to cast Therapy and then sac the Explorer, opening me up for 2 additional mana right away). Also, the high end of my build isn't that high. I'm only playing 3 cards at CMC 5-6. I acknowledge that GSZ is more consistent than Oath for getting your 1-drop by turn 2, but I think Oath trades for some different upsides. Against Sneak and Show, for example, I really like Oath, as you can get Palace Jailer into your hand to stave off the opponent's SNT. All this being said, I'll probably try to squeeze in one more GSZ. Basically, between GSZ, Traverse, and Oath, I think 8 total feels ideal. Maybe I'll trim an Oath for another GSZ.