Originally Posted by
cwcomposer
I'm playing mono-green Titan Post. This was a mono-black Reanimator brew with Lion's Eye Diamonds and Dark Rituals and lots of cards that were new to me.
Game one he was on the play, reanimated Sire of Insantiy, and said "go." I discard my seven cards, draw a non-land card for my turn one, and immediately concede.
Game two, I keep a hand with 2 Relic of Progenitus, Glimmerpost, Dryad Arbor, Crop Rotation, Eye of Ugin, one other card that I don't remember. Turn one, I play Glimmerpost, Relic. In hindsight, perhaps I should've played Dryad Arbor and passed. His turn one he puts Griselbrand into play, attacks, draws 21 cards, casts Unmask to take my Crop Rotation. My turn two, I draw another Crop Rotation, play Dryad Arbor (stupid summoning sickness), pass, thinking if I can make it one more turn I can Crop Rotate for Karakas and get rid of Griselbrand. His turn two he plays a creature and Liliana of the Veil, makes me sac my Dryad Arbor, moves to combat, and I immediately concede.
The round was over in about three minutes. He said, "I'm gonna teach you why Tormod's Crypt is better than Relic." I was like, "I have a policy in Modern that if my opponent will show me that they're playing Grishoalbrand before turn one, I'll immediately concede. I didn't come here to watch my opponent play while I get to do nothing at all. Looks like I found the Legacy equivalent."
Edited to add: I've never, not a single time in my five weeks of playing this deck, found a time when Dryad Arbor was a help rather than a liability. Is it wrong to just cut it?