Steve Menendian
wrote "Loam Lion is just better than Kird Ape, but the results haven’t borne that out – yet." I'm wondering why the Lion is "just better."
Does blue use sufficient blue blasts that they start aiming them at Kird Apes of all things? If the cards were both red and one simply said "cannot be the target of blue elemental blast and hydroblast" then I'd understand. However, the fact that the Lion is white also has downsides.
A deck that's primarily red can tailor its manabase to support that, especially if it also packs Fireblast. Red creatures can piggyback off that foundation and be more easily cast, whereas you're slightly more likely to hold a Lion without the white source to cast it. The chances are small, but so are the chances of your 2/3 getting color-hosed when it's often branded as the worst card in the deck anyway.
So I'm probably missing something, unless Steve thinks that the blue blasts or other red-hate are a huge deal. Any ideas?