Nah, for natural OrderQuote:
Originally Posted by Zombie
Printable View
Nah, for natural OrderQuote:
Originally Posted by Zombie
Nah, 1-of Culling the Weak to play around Surgical Extraction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemnear
You could Natural Order in a Verdant Force for even more flashbacked Cabal Therapies ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemnear
https://www.wizards.com/mtg/images/d...progenitus.jpg
Kills in two swings... or in one AdN flip.
Ok, back on tracks. Was the Dryad Arbor idea meant seriously? Becasue I find it really interesting!
Yeah it was interesting with Diabolic Intent and other creatures MD ...G means half of your fetches can't get certain colors when you need them and the other half can't fetch the Arbor... and now imagine you open 7 with the Arbor as your 1st/2nd land...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bed Decks Palyer
Yes I meant it, I've been experimenting with different ideas between Green Sun's Zenith, Summoner's Pact and Dryad Arbor lately in Veteran ANT and think having the utility to turn lands into disruption is one of the best things about that deck, the alternative man plan with Natural Order into Progenitus is another direction but there are a lot of strategies that come very close to having innate synergy like Green Sun's Zenith accelerating with Dryad Arbor or tutoring for Xantid Swarm or generating the 11 mana to tutor for Progenitus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bed Decks Palyer
It'd take a lot of space in your SB, but just think about what having 4 Green Sun's Zenith, 1 Dryad Arbor, 1 Xantid Swarm, 1 Tropical Island, 1 Bayou would let you do potentially, because suddenly Natural Order is in reach and nobody keeps Swords to Plowshares MD or SBs in Golgari Charm vs ANT.
I'm sure the above posters were just being dicks, but I think tightly weaving Green Sun's Zenith into a Storm shell is really interesting because even tho' it does so inefficiently the tutoring for Xantid Swarm or destroy target artifact/enchantment creature is pretty utilitarian and it effectively is a Llanowar Elf or another Cabal Therapy or both.
It's one of those ideas that people are going to instantly shoot down because they're all like "lol, that's an aggro-control card" but if you look at it from the perspective of being a card that lets you accelerate, disrupt or answer the board while compacting those functions around a single tutor instead of 4 Xantid Swarm or 3 Abrupt Decay or 2 Chrome Mox or whatever it makes some sense to trade efficiency for versatility and I guaranteed you nobody will see it comming at the very least.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nevilshute
Yeah, definitely was. I think for this Christmas I start asking for power :)
I've started gold fishing (without mulliganing) as suggested in the Carsten Kotter 'Storm Regimen' article, I have a notebook I am writing all plays in, but I am also keeping a google spreadsheet w/ the hands and some stats.
Don't know if it will be useful to anyone but I figured I'd link it just in case:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&usp=sharing
I am going to try to get in at least 3 goldfishes a day, work etc. permitting, we'll see how that goes.
Who goes out of town for business without taking their deck with them?Quote:
Originally Posted by anomie-p
Seems pretty bad bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bed Decks Palyer
Adding creatures that aren't Bob or that flying insect seems like a way to turn on their removal. Why not just kill them?
I thought about taking it, but decided not to because I didn't really want to drag that much money in cards six thousand miles without knowing for sure I'd be playing in something.Quote:
Originally Posted by gregtron
(I probably should have brought the deck, though, it would've given me the option of a side trip to scrub out in GP Paris ;) - My plan was to just draft on Fridays at a store a few blocks from the hotel, that turned into 'someone you just met spots you a pod deck so you can play in the modern because no one is drafting, then you go drinking with your opponents afterward', which was pretty sweet, to be honest)
Edit: Took the deck out to my weekly LGS legacy event tonight (second time playing it), four rounds, went 2-0, 1-2, 2-1, 0-2 (one more match than I won last time), had a ton of fun (playing matches with this deck sort of kicks my adrenaline up, there's a lot of suspense, I like it).
@sloshthedark:
Well done at the gp,i saw you on day 2 crushing michael bonde after my other friend defeated him with sneak show :-)
I'm Kai by the way,the guy with foil TES.We played against each other during Bazaar of Moxen in novembre on the sunday event,i was there together with lemnear and we both played the exact same 75 TES during the Bom.
I personally took my beloved 4c delver deck into battle but unfortunately went not very well on the main event although i had many good results the weeks before.
Well happens.
So from now on i'm gonna sleeve up my 3rd deck,ANT.
Probably gonna play it at the next Bazaar of Moxen,see how it goes.
Your current list looks interesting by the way,
Why don't you run ad nauseam anymore?
Isn't it just crazy in the mirror or let's say against any combodeck?
Lightning bolt md to akr care about thalia g1?
I instantly thought about magma jet,as it also scrys for 2 but has a drawback in it's manacost.
This is my current list by the way:
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/26/asyjuseh.jpg
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/26/9u9eqyra.jpg
(Sry for the really bad picture quality)
- Team RUG-STAR Berlin -
Hello, i picked up the deck recently and so far i'm enjoying it and having decent results with it.
My list is pretty stock with 3 preordain, 4 Duress and 3 Cabal therapy and my SB is
3 Xantid Swarm
3 Carpet of Flowers
3 Abrupt Decay
2 Chain of Vapor
3 Dread of Night
1 Empty the Warrens
The matchups that i am struggling the most are Patriot, RUG and DeathBlade (this last one is really a PITA), but surpsingly i'm also having a lot of trouble against Jund/Junk and sometimes Shardless BUG.
The main reason for that is the presence of Surgical Extraction/Extirpate in the sideboard of this decks. What is your main strategy against this cards? I try to keep brainstorm up agains the discard, but i find it very difficult to play around the card, it just makes it quite difficult to win via a PIF loop and with all the discard that is played against us it makes it difficult to win via a natural Tendrills. Not to talk about the situations where you end up with a Tendrills in your hand and you end up with no win condition because it is removed from the game. This happened to me 3 times during the GP Paris, it is quite frustrating.
I have been thinking about adding dark confidant in the SB and one top to the main for this matchups, but that doesnt solve the extraction problem. I play with one ETW to play around it but so far it is not working. Yesterday i thought about adding a single burning wish to the side and another tendrills, this way i can side one burning wish and still have one out.
So a new side would be:
3 Xantid Swarm
3 Abrupt Decay
1 Chain of Vapor
3 Dread of Night
3 Dark confidant
1 Burning Wish
1 Tendrills of Agony
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Sideboarding question here. I see lists with 3 Carpet + 3 Xantid Swarm in the SB (Timo's GP Paris list for example). Aren't these competing slots against tempo/blue counter decks? How do you sideboard when you are running with both?
Hey, they don't compete with each other, usually you dont sideboard the Xantid Swarm against tempo decks, because usually they still have bolts in that can kill them, i just side them against Sneak and Show and Merfolk for example, they are awesome in this match ups.Quote:
Originally Posted by Higgs
Siding BW is wrong, I played two main about a year ago and it wasn't completely bad. It helps against hatebears and extracton effects, and when you paly only two, it won't clog your hand.
Why is siding in BW wrong? You only bring it in if you smell extraction effects from your opponent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bed Decks Palyer
Of cause this makes only sense if you play a second Tendrils in the SB, but personally I hate the idea of being just dead if Tendrils gets extracted.
What has to happen for your opponent to be able to cast a Surgical Extraction targeting Tendrils of Agony? You would have to have Tendrils in your graveyard against an opponent that you already "smell extraction effects from."Quote:
Originally Posted by NoizeMe
Basically, you'd be devoting two sideboard spots (that can be used for a better effect) to a situation that shouldn't be occurring with too much frequency.
What has to happen? Discard :D.Quote:
Originally Posted by Namida
Sometimes you just draw Tendrils and it gets hit by Hymn + Extraction. Also none of this SB slots is wasted.
The second Tendrils comes in handy in matchups like Miracles were games tend to be grindy and firing Mini-Tendrils with help of there counter spells becomes an option.
Burning Wish can come in combo matchups as a 5th business spell.
Sure, I would prefer to have two additional SB slots, but a) I do not want to be dead against discard + extraction effect and b) they are not dead slots.
I'm considering running Bob in the Side also. But i think it's either Bob or Xantid Swarm. They compete for slots, since you want both in the same matchups (Combo Mirror / Esper / Miracles). Would you aggree? I still don't know if Bob is the real deal. People turned away from it for a reason in Storm... Why do you think Bob has become more present in ANT Sideboads in the last weeks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordofthestringz
So your opponent has the discard, the Surgical, and you haven't been able to effectively protect yourself by using your cantrips to avoid putting Tendrils in your hand. I wouldn't blame you for not wanting to be dead against this, but I don't think it should be happening with so much frequency that you would need to bring sideboard cards in for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoizeMe
Also, what else are you going to have in your sideboard to make Wish into a business spell?