I would, but I don't own over half of those cards... and I own a lot of cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Printable View
I would, but I don't own over half of those cards... and I own a lot of cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Needs more Tarmogoyf.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Can we just rename Tarmogoyf 'Cowbell' and be done with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego_Army_Man
Doesn't Humility erm... screw with your combos since Replenish brings back all enchantments and you can't pick and choose?
Are you going to provide the cards? If so, I'll happily play that.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Humility screws with a lot of things. The idea was to give lego something fun to do every round since he is judging.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante
I wasn't expecting to be called out on it twice. But, no, I can't build that deck completely. Why would I build a deck and pay you to play it? Where is the sport in that? But if you can and play it I will pay your entrance fee. (Limited to one player more for avoidance of the mirror in the 0-3 bracket than anything).
Needs more Tarmogoyf? A bit dry isn't it?
He could be studing the Judge's handbook.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Honestly, rules questions like that aren't the biggest headache we have to deal with. If you want "big headache.dec", then you missed Dark Confidant and Sensei's Divining Top, just as a start.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
But seriously... can that deck actually win games?
It certainly could win games but I can't think of a single legacy deck it would win against. Maybe reanimator.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego_Army_Man
Has anyone tried replenish? It is like salvagers game a bit but without the vulnerability to chalice 0,1 and counter top. It is just high CC and slow.
Why was confidant and top so hard? Were people wanting to top after revealing to change the value?
@Cavius
You get a deck to play yet?
It ended like this:
This thread has a one way express ticket to suck-town.
__________________
You have received an infraction at The Source.
Reason: General Asshattery
All the best,
The Source
I don't think I'm going. I'm in the process of building a new deck and I hate borrowing cards from people.Quote:
Originally Posted by never easty
Decks I'm working on...
"Nourishing Lich"
"Spanish Inquistion"
and "Jank Sligh" - exact name soon to be announced.
Show up for moral support. I may have a random jank deck for you to play.:rolleyes:
Is the $10 dollar entry fee set in stone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavius The Great
If you're interested, I have SI built (obviously), and I was planning on playing something else. I know you just said you hate borrowing cards, but I'm just saying...
Thanx for the offers guys, but I definitely can't make this one. I'm definitely going to start going to these things once I get Nourishing Lich built. Evn, sell me your Underground Seas! :wink:
Aggronulet cometh!
So who won out of the Top 4?
P.S. - Great tournament, awesome people, nice gathering, definitely will go again.
Extra kudos to B.C. for loaning me a deck. =)
Top 2 split... Dragon Stompy and R/W Vial Goblins (B.C.?)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavius The Great
Is it possible to get a top 8 (4?) and head count for people who didn't show up maybe?
How many people showed up? Assuming there was a Top 8, what did it look like?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante
Only like 8?Quote:
Originally Posted by kabal
2 Vial Goblins, 1 SI, 2 Dragon Stompy, 1 TES (myself), 1 monowhite angel stompy variant, 1 burn?
Yeah, we got just enough people to make it sanctioned. It was great fun though and playing laid back amongst friends beats playing in any major tournament. I had a great time.