Quote:
No... we are in the middle of 2 discussions that you obviously didn't follow.
That wasn't talking about this thread =p
[quote]If you like statistics then let me tell you the following: The chance to have Leyline on your opening hand with 4 copies in deck is 49,18% - with 3 copies it's 36,89%. I run 3 copies in SB becaue the chance to draw a second one is too high in the course of the game. There goes my first question: When do you bring Leyline in and how does it change your decisions on mulligan in g2 and 3?[quote]
I can see running 3 copies being perfectly fine, this SB was kind of thrown together today while I was driving around and I was a little worried about sticking one copy beginning of game and then getting stuck with 2 others in my hand.
Quote:
An alternative to Back to Nature ist Reverent Silence. What do you think?
While Rev Silence is nice, isnt giving our opponent life the complete opposite of goblins game plan?
Quote:
I think Pyrokinesis is a great card but it needs practice to use it right. Many people come to the conclusion that "this card just sucks, cause I always have to pitch my Matron or Ringleader or what ever other wincondition!". Therefore: Use it as LATE as possible.
I will keep that in mind and practice/test with it some more.
Quote:
I wouldn't add Anarchy, maybe you can REPLACE Back to Nature, but adding Anarchy is not an option imo.
Quote:
Thorn is imo only good for 2 MU's: Combo and Enchantress. Against most other decks it's either useless or there are just better cards waiting in your SB. Therfore: I wouldn't run it as a 2 of if you dont have any other combo hate.
Our MU against TES and ANT is 49-51 in our favor. I explained this like 2 pages ago, maybe you can read the post. It seems though that we win 2-1 most of the matches. Therefore we seem to have rather effective combo hate. Because of this I'd dedicate 3-4 slots to combo hate, it's worth it!
Well we have alot of enchantress running around our meta, hence the back to natures to get rid of elephant grass. but I guess rev silence would be better against that matchup with Sterling Groves.
Quote:
@ you maindeck: I run a 3colored build with 4 Ports and 4 Wastes and I came to the conclusion that we should keep our nonbasic-count low and fetchland count rather high - to be flexible and less vulerable to wastelands. I'd either cut some black cards MD and go for 2 Badlands or just leave them out. Especially with Kiki-Jiki (with mana costs RRR) it's not wise to run 8 colorless lands.
I'm not impressed with running 8 colorless sources and thinking of cutting ports for 2 reasons, I dont have access to any and 8 colorless sources is just too much.