Originally Posted by
Mr. Safety
I've always been on the DGA side of the spectrum as well, which is where I originally got the Scullers. Before I had my set of Goyfs I was playing 4x Sculler in their place, and I would curve Thoughtseize into Sculler into Hymn and wreck a lot of decks (this was just around the time Deathrite Shaman was printed.) Old data is no way to build a current deck though. The scullers could become a 3rd Hymn and a 2nd Library main. It's probably correct to do that, honestly, I just love Sculler! I'm not a pro player, so fun-factor plays more into my card choices than it probably should.
Mox Diamond would only really be good if you were also dedicated to some sort of Loam synergy. Aggro-loam is a real deck, and it's a great way to take advantage of the fast mana MDiamond can give you. In this sort of 'good stuff Junk/DGA' style of deck I feel that all of the cards need to really pull their weight in a big way, and just playing the spells that do the best job is the way to do that. Mox speeds it up, but at what expense? I don't even know what I'd cut for 1 Chrome Mox, let alone 2 copies. Dark Confidant is the worst in multiples...but the best thing to do is t1 Dark Confidant.
Now that I have your attention, how do you feel about 3 copies of SFM? I have always done 2-3 copies, never 4, simply because with Tarmogoyf the need for Batterskull as a beefy threat gets smaller, and I didn't want dead cards in the late game (a 1/2 for 2 mana is silly, to say the least.) That might open up another redundant card for Chrome Mox. I think the general consensus of players, even with only 2 equips, is to play the full set of SFM. Curious on your take there.