-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HSCK
@Dice_Box: I feel the same way about the format with Miracles. Its worst match up is 50/50 which is just insane.
How in the world is 12-Post a 50/50 matchup for Miracles?
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lord Seth
How in the world is 12-Post a 50/50 matchup for Miracles?
Doubt it's that good for miracles, but Blood Moon/B2B/Mentor
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fox
Doubt it's that good for miracles, but Blood Moon/B2B/Mentor
Listing cards that can maybe make the matchup into 30/70 for Miracles isn't the same as a matchup being 50/50.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lemnear
Pointing at an outclassed killcondition while everyone runs Mentor anyways
Never underestimate the power of baddies and their refusal to admit that cards are good/bad.
(not referring to btm btw)
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
I haven't lost to an Angel in months. The only reason to run Angel's these days as I understand is for Shardless or when you bring in Moat. Even then it's normally a sideboard card.
Removing a sideboard card doesn't feel like an answer to any meaningful question.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
Removing a sideboard card doesn't feel like an answer to any meaningful question.
Clearly the answer is to restrict Ancient Tomb.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stevestamopz
Miracles is boring to play against, boring to watch. It's frustrating to play against and has draws that make you feel like you never had a chance. It can make you want to throw your deck out of the room and make you rage-quit magic as you ask yourself "why the fuck can't I just be a normal person that has hobbies they enjoy" for the millionth time.
Is Miracles unique in this? No. Every deck with Griselbrand in it is 100% devoid of skill and way too powerful. Storm decks are also super powerful and can beat decks with Force + Spell Pierce, and regularly do... so what chance does the deck not playing 4 Thalia, 3 Ethersworn and Revoker have? DRS is a huge turd and has reshaped the format into either playing it, or playing a deck that can ignore it/blank it.
The format is miserable all around now. Every deck is either derp I win or "let me assemble the best cards and mash them into 60 cards." Nothing is fun, nothing is enjoyable nothing feels like it's worth my time anymore. Miracles isn't the problem, it's just another symptom of what has become a shitty format. Mind, it's still the best format, but that's not saying much is it?
Your posts all sound legacy is a format which s too competetive to you. (Hopefully I remember correctly that you are also the guy who pissed because most decks stomp over your goblin-aggro deck and recruiter is still banned.)
I don't know what your defenition of "fun" is but legacy doen't seem to be fitting for you. I recommend trying EDH where everybody can do what they think is fun with most of legecay's card pool.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Steve is not playing Goblins any more.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
There are no bad decks, just bad players
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
swoop
There are no bad decks, just bad players
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
that is simply just not right
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
swoop
There are no bad decks, just bad players
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Nourishing Lich OP
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lord_Mcdonalds
Clearly the answer is to restrict Ancient Tomb.
I am so down for this.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Restrictions in legacy?
Hahahaha
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sidneyious
Restrictions in legacy?
Hahahaha
I heared StarCityGames does just that
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Guys, we've gotten off topic.
I for one, think Brainstorm should be banned.
Discuss.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Brainstorm 2016
Clearly Storm is a problem at the moment. Can we just get a ban on Dark Ritual?
They can unban Mind Twist since, for some retarded reason, people think RIT RIT RIT MINDTWIST! is better than Rit rit rit "actually win the game"
They feel the same about "Elves elves elves mind twist" as opposed to "elves elves elves" win too; but let's just hit storm cuz why not.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tescrin
Brainstorm 2016
Clearly Storm is a problem at the moment. Can we just get a ban on Dark Ritual?
They can unban Mind Twist since, for some retarded reason, people think RIT RIT RIT MINDTWIST! is better than Rit rit rit "actually win the game"
They feel the same about "Elves elves elves mind twist" as opposed to "elves elves elves" win too; but let's just hit storm cuz why not.
Clearly? Based on which multiple tournament dominating finishes?
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zooligan
Clearly? Based on which multiple tournament dominating finishes?
Sarcasm wrote a great tournament report on Storms dominance. Worth a read.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
Sarcasm wrote a great tournament report on Storms dominance. Worth a read.
Search for user name Sarcasm using the advanced search tells me "Invalid user specified". Also not seeing anything in the first three pages of the Tournament Reports forum that looks like something about Storm by anyone with a username close to Sarcasm.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Ouch. I almost feel bad for reading that.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Dice right now:
https://ageofshitlords.com/wp-conten...hit-poster.png
But seriously, when is Brainstorm getting banned?
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
Um...
Was that "Um..." for me? What am I missing? Where can I find the TR you mentioned?
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zooligan
Was that "Um..." for me? What am I missing? Where can I find the TR you mentioned?
The clue is in the name you are searching for.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Stevestamopz
Never
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Sometimes I feel down on myself, then I revisit this thread and a few posts later I feel much better about my life.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tescrin
Brainstorm 2016
Clearly Storm is a problem at the moment. Can we just get a ban on Dark Ritual?
They can unban Mind Twist since, for some retarded reason, people think RIT RIT RIT MINDTWIST! is better than Rit rit rit "actually win the game"
They feel the same about "Elves elves elves mind twist" as opposed to "elves elves elves" win too; but let's just hit storm cuz why not.
Actually banning brainstorm and remove mentor and banning ritual could be a solution to let the format shift.
Don't know if they like to shift.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tescrin
Brainstorm 2016
Clearly Storm is a problem at the moment. Can we just get a ban on Dark Ritual?
They can unban Mind Twist since, for some retarded reason, people think RIT RIT RIT MINDTWIST! is better than Rit rit rit "actually win the game"
They feel the same about "Elves elves elves mind twist" as opposed to "elves elves elves" win too; but let's just hit storm cuz why not.
YOU LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE
/s
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chatto
The clue is in the name you are searching for.
Ah. The lousy sentence structure and flimsy punctuation makes it seem like a user named Sarcasm (not out of the realm of possibility) wrote a tournament report (which logic dictates would the in the Tournament Reports forum) and probably having some sort of title referring to Storm somehow.
And apparently Dice_Box thinks it's a good read. However, if the report has similar writing style (or lack thereof, really) to Dice_Box's post, I'm not sure reading it would really be that great. :eyeroll
Just for reference:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
Sarcasm wrote a great tournament report on Storms dominance. Worth a read.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zooligan
Ah. The lousy sentence structure and flimsy punctuation makes it seem like a user named Sarcasm (not out of the realm of possibility) wrote a tournament report (which logic dictates would the in the
Tournament Reports forum) and probably having some sort of title referring to Storm somehow.
And apparently Dice_Box thinks it's a good read. However, if the report has similar writing style (or lack thereof, really) to Dice_Box's post, I'm not sure reading it would really be that great. :eyeroll
If we're in the business of long form explanation; my post was just saying that people think DRits into Mind Twist is bad; but DRits into AN is fine; which is dumb.
Derogatory language removed. Please don't use that word as an insult here, even in jest. Thanks. -zilla
They also think the same thing about Elves.
The problem of course being that if Storm's whole plan is "lol I'll stall the game by Twisting you for 3!" or "I'll Twist them before using Tendrils" when they could have just won instead, or used therapy post AN; is not functional. Similarly, Elves could generate 4 mana and "lol 3-for-1'd ya!!" but they could've instead just NO'd you for the win; meaning that all they did was make the deck worse. It could replace Glimpse I guess.. but probably not. They may even say "lol but what about Tezz or MUD!?"
To which I say "why would you add Discard spells to a deck that is made to lock you out of the game?"
Mind Twist 2016
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zooligan
Just for reference:
I was being cute with my post. Others seemed to get it. It did not seem like that much of a stretch that it would be understood. Doubly so once you work out that its not a username on the site. Not that it matters, you and I did liven up a shitty thread for a day or so. Thanks for that.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
I was being cute with my post. Others seemed to get it. It did not seem like that much of a stretch that it would be understood. Doubly so once you work out that its not a username on the site. Not that it matters, you and I did liven up a shitty thread for a day or so. Thanks for that.
Uh.. you're welcome?? I'll do my best to remain entertainingly obtuse in the future. In case you haven't heard, it's now a trend in the US to be willfully ignorant. :tongue:
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zooligan
Uh.. you're welcome?? I'll do my best to remain entertainingly obtuse in the future. In case you haven't heard, it's now a trend in the US to be willfully ignorant. :tongue:
I did smile at the great direct hit Dice scored with the sarcasm bit. And Willfully ignorant is a good boiler plate description and all. But just stop right there. It hurts too much. Seriously, it's a real problem for the planet how batshit stupid we Americans are.
Pardon me now. I have to go paint a picket sign.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
I have already nuked a pair of posts with direct political undertones, let's.... Not. Not today.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Is there something unbannable to make mono white lantern control viable? Like can we get balance? World can't get much worse than it already got anyway.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gheizen64
Is there something unbannable to make mono white lantern control viable? Like can we get balance? World can't get much worse than it already got anyway.
I second that. Just do it and put the format to its deserved rest
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Finn
I did smile at the great direct hit Dice scored with the sarcasm bit. And Willfully ignorant is a good boiler plate description and all. But just stop right there. It hurts too much. Seriously, it's a real problem for the planet how batshit stupid we Americans are.
Pardon me now. I have to go paint a picket sign.
I agree with you. The lack of empathy, and context, in this country is unfortunately lacking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
I have already nuked a pair of posts with direct political undertones, let's.... Not. Not today.
Can we do it tomorrow? Or the day after tomorrow?
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ahg113
Can we do it tomorrow? Or the day after tomorrow?
If you believe that right now is a good time to open dialogue on this subject, PM Zilla for permission to open a thread on the matter. If you personally asked me though, I would say no.
-
Re: All B/R update speculation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dice_Box
If you believe that right now is a good time to open dialogue on this subject, PM Zilla for permission to open a thread on the matter. If you personally asked me though, I would say no.
Hmmm, on SB Nation blogs/boards, one can activate sarcasm font by book-ending text with the "@" symbol. That would've made the sarcasm more obvious, without having to type Sarcasm as a faux user name. No request being made.
-
Why is contract from below banned?
IMO Contract from Below does not belong on the banned list.
With the current oracle wording, Contract from Below must be removed before you play if you do not play for ante, so it is not possible to cast Contract from Below in a sanctioned environment. The function Contract from Below would have would be to run a virtual 56 card deck similar to Street Wraith and (to some degree) Gitaxian Probe.
Contract from Below
"Remove Contract from Below from your deck before playing if you're not playing for ante.
Discard your hand, ante the top card of your library, then draw seven cards."