Hi, do you think Hoover signature is genuine?
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/05...8155cad88b.jpg
Inviato da mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
Printable View
Hi, do you think Hoover signature is genuine?
http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/05...8155cad88b.jpg
Inviato da mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
Tbh, if that would be my only mox emerald i would love it no matter how is damaged :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by Undomian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undomian
Beta Power, even if beat, better than UNL. Congrats on starting, now go after the Lotus.
-Matt
I am finally up to date on this thread from not visiting since the end of January. The best post was from nedleeds.
2nd best was the cube post.Quote:
Originally Posted by nedleeds
Vegas is closing in fast. If you plan on going, be sure to stop by the Grey Ogre booth to tell me about your pool or to BS.
This mox is gorgeous. I have a thing for cards with battlescars. Can you imagine how many Elvish Archers and Birds Of Paradise this thing must have casted ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Undomian
How much did you pay for it and where did you find it ?
Beautiful Mox Emerald!
Unfortunately, it looks fake. I would not buy it, or if you have, I'd get a refund. I know this only from being a lurker on the signed cards group on facebook. This is the signature put out by a fellow named Joaquin Hernandez who was forging Quinton's sig for a while and selling them on ebay and MCM. His forgeries have very distinct characteristics that don't match up with any of Quinton's known sig variants, and this one has all of the telltale signs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent-89
Markers would probably be the best to confirm this outright though.
You think? #NoRespectQuote:
Originally Posted by Undomian
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...pseaqiouiy.jpg
The point for posting:
http://i1166.photobucket.com/albums/...psmumjjbjw.jpg
That sig looks VERY off. +95% sure it's fake. I would get my money back.Quote:
Originally Posted by eays
you can see for yourself, in markers signature, the link me@WOTC his signed beta set is viewable which contains several cards signed by Quinton. Choose any of the following cards and compare the signature
Darkpact
Earthbind
Feedback
Meekstone
Nettling Imp
Regeneration
Vesuvan Doppelganger
Wrath of God
Hey there folks,
Today in my little shiny blog, some pictures of a nice Legacy deck!
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/b...pspr1wuybn.jpg
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/b...pspdcbh3l1.jpg
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/b...psbfsqnraa.jpg
And here's the sideboard:
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/b...pswkhf6pvt.jpg
More pictures, as always, in Super Secret Tech. Enjoy!
Continuing my trend of posting stuff that sdMatt wants.... I bought these for EDH and 93/94. I actually only needed 1 more but seeing as Matt is looking I decided to take another out of circulation :cool:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...200bfa516c9005
What do you guys prefer? The original foil Ravnica Dark Confidant or the foil judge promo?
Want to buy 2 foil Bobis but I'm unsure which version :rolleyes:
I almost always aim for the original print.
They're both great. It would be snap Judge but the shooting star is in the middle of text box and not where it should be on the bottom of the text box. Honestly, all personal preference. I prefer Judge Bobs over Rav ones because of old border.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manipulato
Ah, so it's you who contacted me via MKM about if I split my playset I planned to sell ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Manipulato
Always the first pack foil version.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manipulato
Always foil old border if available.
P.D.: Don't you have khans of tarkir polluted deltas? :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnGalt
this. always foil packQuote:
Originally Posted by JohnGalt
For sale :)Quote:
Originally Posted by guillemnicolau
I would absolutely love the Judge Dark Confidants because I love the old border, but the fugly shooting star in the middle of the text box is hideous. If it was at the bottom like the old foils, or where the set symbol normally goes... I'd have them instead of my set of foil Ravnica.Quote:
Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual
Ignore the trops :) Been working on this for years... and always first print pack foil!
http://i.imgur.com/SXvpF9Y.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/cv0xIZe.jpg
The first print pack foil Lightning Bolt is M10 but I'm gonna let it slide.Quote:
Originally Posted by rlesko
touche...Quote:
Originally Posted by thecrav
old style foiling > first pack foil > ....
I love SCG sales. I guess now I have to get into old school magic?
http://i.imgur.com/Zmn65IHh.jpg
Oozing in all of his splendour :)
Mana:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...7/IMG_0078.JPG
Combo:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...7/IMG_0079.JPG
Draw:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...7/IMG_0080.JPG
I don't like foils and I only use signed cards that I obtain myself (signed in front of me...)
The old triskellion image is so cool :)
Yeah, I have always found it very funny :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilhas
Not unless you bend the most ridiculous rule that format has:Quote:
Originally Posted by phazonmutant
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93/94 B/R List
There are numerous flavors of Old School, which was why I made a thread over in the Variant Format forum here to discuss it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Undomian
The original Swedish format is very elitist by design. The versions we have here in the US are much more inclusive (allowing Revised and FWB/FBB).
Found this on my phone today. A friend lent me this a few months back. He doesn't post on here so I'll do it.
Main:
http://i.imgur.com/yjHJ2d4.jpg
Lands:
http://i.imgur.com/PH4ZnqD.jpg
Board:
http://i.imgur.com/rpTa6kT.jpg
That looks awesome.
Is it me or are these pictures ginormous?
(Strangely they show up OK in preview when writing this post O.o What's up with that?)
What's everyones opinion on getting non MTG related stuff altered on cards? Part of me thinks its tacky and ugly. The other part of me REALLY wants to personalize my deck with pop culture references from my childhood.
Pimp is in the eye of the beholder.
They're your cards. Do what you want.
In my opinion is not a good idea if you plan to play big tournaments. Modifying the art of a card to the point that the card is no longer easy recognizable may lead to judges not allowing to play it. Another thing is extending the art, or making little changes, which won't affect the cards playability in big tournaments.
Example:
This card should be allowed to be played in a tournament:
http://teresenielsen.typepad.com/.a/...e3928834-500pi
These cards may not be allowed to be played in a tournament:
http://moxes.genexcomics.com/images/...iones_fows.jpg
http://www.fotos-hochladen.net/uploa...i0onzrjl8w.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by AznSeal
I drawed Homer and Bart on two of my Food Chain cards, because i love the Simpsons!
So u made both of them a big step forward to not get allowed in any REL comp event.
But in the end its allways the discission of the HJ if they are legal in that one tournament or not.
Gues this topic doesnt this belong here anyway-.-'
Very well. I'll post the entire deck when I have time but right now it's entirely s-chinese foil for the most part if possible, and s-chinese non foil if a foil printing doesn't exist. I'm in the process of getting stuff altered. Here's several I have done so far
http://i.imgur.com/MLeDh9t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/QC9xmG2.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/CUDbMgr.jpg
Not Legacy but I'm so proud of my P9 set that I want to show it nevertheless...
3 weeks ago I had none of them, now I have them all :-D
http://www.bilderload.com/bild/368251/p922Q4Y.jpg
Regards,
Alessio