Creature type Phyrexian means we're gonna have a lot of errata to remember soon
Printable View
Creature type Phyrexian means we're gonna have a lot of errata to remember soon
Looking forward to my Pyre of Hero/Changeling/Phyrexian deck! :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by PirateKing
We can play Phyrexian Tribal soon? Neat.Quote:
Originally Posted by PirateKing
Phyrexians on the Viking plane is quite surprising, though.
Nine realms, nine spheres of phyrexia. Makes you think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barook
Finally the Cavern on Dreadnought will cast more than one thing. :laugh:
Why can't we have a viking plane and work with that? Why the *bleep* do we need Phyrexia to show up? This is a non sequitur that irks me. Are we getting Phyrexian Snow permanents? What does that even mean? Is this a legit card? This is not the Xmas present I wanted, Wizards.
You sound like on of those "Skyrim for the Nords!" folks from Windhelm. :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by the Thin White Duke
This is exactly the Christmas present I wanted. LONG LIVE YAWGMOTH!Quote:
Originally Posted by the Thin White Duke
He's dead. Get over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pittplayer
Then it's creature type is actually going to be Phyrexian Dreadnought - that's pretty neat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
The sheer creative bankruptcy at wizards is astounding.
After they left Dominaria, they never ever managed to make any interesting stories or create a continuous narrative.
It was already pretty bad that they had to unearth Nicol Bolas to make him a Thanos to give the multiverse power ranges a reason to exist.
Going back to the Phyrexians again after the last Mirrodin block is just embarrassing.
For Mirrodin it at least fit thematically.
I'm just waiting for them to bring back Yawgmoth because they can't come up with an engaging story if their life would depend on it.
What bothers me is the general though behind bringing back the Phyrexians.
How much of the standard crowd actually remembers sets with Phyrexians, let a lone has an emotional attachment to them?
New Phyrexia was released almost 10 years ago and even that lacked the year long build up and a setting the sets up to Invasion had.
However reference for reference has worked well for Dominaria, Modern Horizons, and the past Commander products, even though the later to don't attempt to tell a story.
I guess it's only natural in a sense given the trend in other media in the last decade to remake and recycle everything thinking it's safe while still failing at almost every attempt.
If they errata plague engineer that could actually be the start of an interesting deck...Quote:
Originally Posted by Barook
If Phyrexian Revoker gets errated as well and then we're talking!Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeplcheep
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeplcheep
There's also Phyrexian Negator, Phyrexian Obliterator and Phyrexian Metamorph, for what it's worth. The new Pyre into Obliterator might be something, but let's wait for the errata first before we brew Phyrexian Stompy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cire
Feel lucky there's no Jace involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by the Thin White Duke
https://mythicspoiler.com/khm/cards/...rofsecrets.jpg
Merry Christmas?
Can almost stop Oko.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoid
How? You play this pass the turn he makes this into a elk.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
Yep, exactly. Another overcosted creature that can't ever do anything about a PW; a truly great use of a rare slot. WotC needs to put pro-UG rather than "can't be countered" if they want cards like this to matter. Like what is this card? Is this just throwing a bone to Commander players who want a second [crappier] Edric?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pittplayer
It's a Squirrel in Standard, no need to actually make it good anywhere.