Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Barook
The ping doesn't seem worth the one extra mana and the backside doesn't matter.
Paying 3 mana for a transformer that doesn't pass the bolt or push test doesn't seem worth it at all.
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Purple Blood
Is that really much better than Rule of Law which AFAIK sees very little play?
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rufus
Is that really much better than
Rule of Law which AFAIK sees very little play?
Yes, I think so. The body makes a difference. While the body makes the effect easier to remove, having a 3/3 in play matters. Also, the second line of text can matter in initiative fights and vs. haste.
Now, I don't know if this is good enough to see play in a pretty crowded 3cmc slot for white (Anointed Peacekeeper, Elite Spellbinder, and Archon of Emeria).
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Whoshim
Yes, I think so. The body makes a difference. While the body makes the effect easier to remove, having a 3/3 in play matters. Also, the second line of text can matter in initiative fights and vs. haste.
Now, I don't know if this is good enough to see play in a pretty crowded 3cmc slot for white (Anointed Peacekeeper, Elite Spellbinder, and Archon of Emeria).
I have no idea how viable it is but the effect could also be incredibly lopsided if there are enough cards with the Phyrexian type on them? I assume the tribal spells are all trash but even just being able to outpace the opponent with creatures while keeping them under Rule of Law during opponent's turn sounds interesting
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Whoshim
...Yes, I think so. The body makes a difference. While the body makes the effect easier to remove, having a 3/3 in play matters. Also, the second line of text can matter in initiative fights and vs. haste. ...
Oh, I brainfarted and didn't see that it was a creature. That does make a big difference.
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
http://mythicspoiler.com/mom/cards/elspethstalent.jpg
Vulnerable and way too narrow due to depending on a PW, but the sheer amount of power this thing can generate is certainly something. Combine it with Samut, Tyrant Smasher and you have a nice junk brew.
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Barook
The Liliana one from the cycle is actually pretty nifty, especially when there's a high loyalty Walker involved
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
FourDogsinaHorseSuit
The Liliana one from the cycle is actually pretty nifty, especially when there's a high loyalty Walker involved
Pretty sure the ability is -8, which leaves the less than stellar passive.
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Barook
The problem with that is that the trigger resolves before the tokens are created.
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zoid
The problem with that is that the trigger resolves before the tokens are created.
They don't have haste and the ability ends at turn so they can't use it anyways
Re: March of the Machines Spoiler Thread (or 'What if we put all our lore in a blende
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Barook
Pretty sure the ability is -8, which leaves the less than stellar passive.
That passive was the whole reason I'd play it.
I said a high loyalty Walker because of you can get two attackers to commit....
