Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JohnnyCage
So what your doing is giving us a suboptimal list then saying try to make that work. And cutting down others advice isn't a way to get that done. Thoughtseize doesn't belong in the board and i agree with PF on that. The point everyone is making is you can't slave drive results and inspiration. You need to heed their advice. The list you posted is quite suboptimal, so asking us to go back and create a board for said list is quite the oxymoron...
Well, in my eyes and not only mine, also that of various other very good players I know, this is the best maindeck list for my meta. Because I will run this list anyway, I said to not change it, because that won't do me any good.
I do think Thoughtseize belongs in my board, but you can ignore it if you want. You may replace them with basic forests in the thought experiment if you want to.
If you are interested in why: it's my Sb plan against pretty much anything nonblue, to take their CotV, Trinisphere, Gaddock Teeg, Cannonist, Pillar, Hymn, Runed Halo, Chant, Thoughtseize, Duress, Sphere of Resistance, Thorn of Amethyst. I usually bring it in for 4 Chant.
Sorry if I came off a little harsh, it's just that I specifically said some things, because I knew if they would be ignored the advice wouldn't be of any use to me and then they get ignored...:rolleyes:
I don't see everyone making the point that I am slave driving results or creativity, but I apologise for sounding like it.
"Oxymoron"? I don't see the contradiction. (I had to look that up, I'm not from the States)
I do appreciate it when people at least try to help, because many times things just get ignored on this forum.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pulp_Fiction
These are the protection spells I run:
4x Orim's Chant
4x Duress
I am not a big fan of the Blast plan since it requires quite a few lands in play. If you are trying to ask what the best protection spell is, it is Orim's Chant by a clear mile (this can depend on what deck you are playing but usually this is it). Chant covers all the bases and allows you to cast IGG regardless of whats in the opponent's yard. It acts as a timewalk when cast in the early turns and OWNS Enchantress and Dredge as well as timewalks and fogs aggro, as good as it gets.
Regarding Pact of Negation, I will not argue this again in another combo thread but I will state this if you deck runs Lion's Eye Diamond then PoN is shit, if it doesn't then the card is very much viable.
vs. Orims chant, when you play your own chant, they chant in response thus time walking while Pact of negation just simply negates it.
and vs. a counterbalance in play pact of negation and chant sucks. when pyroblast counters it (ofcourse when he plays it)
The debate i'm trying to start is, what protective cards are most versatile, and how can you make a SB that is also versatile. But everyone is still posting decklists saying "what do i do against blue decks... "
well, what do you WANT to have?
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bahamuth
He is not giving a suboptimal list at all, he just said that. Please read carefully. You can't say anything about the quality of his list, because it's dependant on the metagame it's played in, and you don't know what metagame that is. I know matelml, he can most certainly defend his card choices in this list. The list is in our metagame certainly not suboptimal. Perhaps up for debate, but not bad.
I don't see the problem with the question. He's just asking for advice on how to construct the sideboard to fight CB Threshold, not wether the rest of his list is good. You could just give a (perhaps your own?) decent SB plan against CB Thresh, and maybe it'll be usefull.
So were back to 4 IT, really, maybe if the entire meta is completely underdeveloped but in any healthy meta IT should never be a four of. If he was openly asking for advice he wouldn't go around shooting down the advice given. I'm not saying his list is terrible. Its definately a start but it is worse then most the list on here for a healthy meta. His main is geared to completely destroy anything not blue. Its faster then the average list, I get that but the reason he is asking is because he keeps losing in top 8 to the one guy playing counter top. If he altered his main slightly he would be in better shape to begin with. Thats all i'm saying And i'm not trying to be harsh either, i reread my post and i came off sounding...with the wrong tone so please ignore that. But please take into account an edit of your main, i highly encourage it.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JohnnyCage
So were back to 4 IT, really, maybe if the entire meta is completely underdeveloped but in any healthy meta IT should never be a four of. If he was openly asking for advice he wouldn't go around shooting down the advice given. I'm not saying his list is terrible. Its definately a start but it is worse then most the list on here for a healthy meta. His main is geared to completely destroy anything not blue. Its faster then the average list, I get that but the reason he is asking is because he keeps losing in top 8 to the one guy playing counter top. If he altered his main slightly he would be in better shape to begin with. Thats all i'm saying And i'm not trying to be harsh either, i reread my post and i came off sounding...with the wrong tone so please ignore that. But please take into account an edit of your main, i highly encourage it.
Thanks, but there are some wrong assumptions you make.
I'm not openly asking for any advice, but just for the CB match-up. My assessment of my meta is that I don't need to change my main for the match-up, because it is so little played. You may call this an "undeveloped meta" if you want to, but it's like this in most of the Netherlands and Belgium, as far as I know.
The reason I'm asking for advice is not that I keep losing to CB in the T8. In fact, the last tournament I played that list, I split top 2, at 56 ppl. I'm pretty happy with my main, but my Sb could be better, probably. Since I know my meta better than most people on TheSource, I don't ask "What Sb and MB should I run?", but ask something more specific.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
What i reckon, the best thing against CB is pyroblast or something else that counters it, spellsnare has been debated but people didn't like it.
You can't count on discarding their CB when they have brainstorm or just plain topdeck. Orim's chant doesn't do anything, neither do Pact of negation.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
That's why this deck should run Tropical Island and 3-4 Krosan Grips. You can afford to wait because usually Goyf is no more than a 3/4. EOT Grip, and on your turn Duress that FoW, Chant against Snares and Dazes, and go boom.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
I highly recommend one change to main, drop one IT and add one AdN at least that will help boarding. And perhaps a splash of red and 7 or 8 blast side would help. You would have to alter your main a little more but i honstly have been testing the blast version and have been loving it.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
So how would you suggest to board then? How many Blasts? Krosan Grips? How many Chants and Duress left in game 2? Keep LEDs? Keep IGG?
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
@matelml: Ur welcome :) I play lots o' combo so I am just helpful all around!
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
3 Gemstone Mine
3 Polluted Delta
3 Bloodstained Mire
2 Underground Sea
1 Badlands
1 Volcanic Island
1 Swamp
4 Brainstorm
3 Mystical Tutor
1 Ponder
4 Burning Wish
4 Infernal Tutor
4 Dark Ritual
4 Rite of Flame
4 Lotus Petal
4 Lion's Eye Diamond
3 Chrome Mox
2 Cabal Ritual
2 Ad Nauseam
1 Orim's Chant
1 Ill-Gotten Gains
1 Tendrils of Agony
--- Sideboard ---
2 Pyroclasm
2 Orim's Chant
2 Tormod's Crypt
1 Ill-Gotten Gains
1 Tendrils of Agony
1 Empty the Warrens
1 Thoughtseize
1 Chain of Vapor
1 Telemin Performance
1 Grim Tutor
1 Meltdown
1 Scrubland
I find it kinda funny that I came up with this list after reading about AnT variants with red, and after reading the GP coverages, it turned out that it's MD is one card off from Kolowith's (1 Iggy instead of 1 Ponder). Telemin performance was added after seeing Kolowith's list.
The maindeck Iggy may seem strange, especially with AdN getting to flip it, but it sped up the deck, allowing for more consistent kills.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
What do u mean it was one card off? The ponder vs ill-gotten gains confused the shit out of me.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
I mean I run an Ill-Gotten Gains in the main where Kolowith ran a Ponder.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
So I ran the eight blast version tonight in a tourney into a meta full of counterbalance and landstill and even a tog...i wanted to see if the deck could really take it and stand up thnks to blast...I was quite pleased when i went the entire night 5-1 only losing in finals to red thresh and one....NASTY AdN...it literally went..2...2...4...5...4...i was not a happy camper...but the spirit guides and blast were amazing...the only thing i would change is board...i dont feel we need 3 chains...most stuff we bounce goes up to hurklyls....i want two more tendrils actually...at least to test and try a double tendrils plan...perhaps even try boarding bob again...whats the thoughts peeps?
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
I'm going to play in the Scandinavian Masters in sweden, i have no clue about the meta, but my guess is there will be it's fair share of blue with and without CB but other decks as well. The most versatile version i like is the one with the LED-tutor package.
4 LED
3 Infernal Tutor
4 Dark Ritual
4 Cabal Ritual
4 Mystical Tutor
4 Brainstorm
4 Ponder
2 Ad Nauseum
1 Ill-Gotten Gains
1 Tendrils of Agony
1 Thoughtseize
4 Duress
4 Petal
4 Chrome Mox
4 Delta
3 Strand
1 Island
1 Swamp
1 Volcanic Island
2 Sea
2 City of traitors
The slots i twiddle with is
+- 1 ponder
+- 1 tendrils
+- 1 chrome mox
+- 1 IGG
But for my sideboard i wanna transition to fully compete with threshold and CB.
4 Simian spirit guide
4 pyroblast
3-4 red elemtal blast
1 Badlands
3-4 Bounce (wipe away, hurkyls, echoing)
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
I don't think SSG is very good because of Ad Nauseam. Also, it doesn't add to the storm count.
I also don't see why you don't run Burning Wish - you have red...
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Someone else posted that SSG doesn't pose a serious life threat.
And the deck isn't red, it just has a red sideboard, I dont have space to have a sorcery-sideboard.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Do not run SSG... For the love of god... Dont run it. Add like an additonal red fetch and another land if you must... but DONT RUN SSG...
That is all.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
You're not playing wish and only running 3 Infernal Tutor? Especially with LEDs...
You're siding in SSG/Red blast to compete with thresh? Why not run a single Scrubland to fetch and Orim's Chants instead? Considering you run Tutor, you should probably cut City for Gemstone Mine/Fetches and Scrubland to play a single Chant main.
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
hi, I've never been on this thread before. but it looks exactly like someone took TES and stuck some fetchlands in it. what am I missing ?
:confused:
Re: [DTW] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Seriously
hi, I've never been on this thread before. but it looks exactly like someone took TES and stuck some fetchlands in it. what am I missing ?
:confused:
Reading the other 41 pages.