Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AlmostGrown
@grinningdemon Why are there 2 different ponders? Needs more 3 ball ponder!
I guess I haven't got around to that yet.
Re: [Bragging] Pimp Legacy Decks
Insane.
Just insane!!
Does this deck rock??
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thegrinningdemon
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
door
These are actually extremely common on ports. They're not scratches, but a printing error. I've seen more jap foil ports with the dots than ones without them. So knowing this, it's probably unethical to ask for a refund since it's not damage.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hukstor
These are actually extremely common on ports. They're not scratches, but a printing error. I've seen more jap foil ports with the dots than ones without them. So knowing this, it's probably unethical to ask for a refund since it's not damage.
Keep in mind too that this was the first full production of foils disbursed in boosters. There were a higher frequency of foil-cut lines and other printing errors.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hukstor
These are actually extremely common on ports. They're not scratches, but a printing error. I've seen more jap foil ports with the dots than ones without them. So knowing this, it's probably unethical to ask for a refund since it's not damage.
Wow, didn't know about that. Thank you very much, that helped.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Well.. after a long time in the mail, those finally came back to me :)
Though I am extremely grateful that he did sign them, this wasn't the nicest experience I had with an artist. Getting them back with four different signatures and in a (at least I think so) slightly worse condition doesn't help, too.
But oh well, I got them back, so that counts ;D
http://mortr3d.funpic.de/Kaertchen/GGT_chin_signed.jpg
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hukstor
These are actually extremely common on ports. They're not scratches, but a printing error. I've seen more jap foil ports with the dots than ones without them. So knowing this, it's probably unethical to ask for a refund since it's not damage.
Yes, mine have dots.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Angry trolls. Needs m0@r gold ink pen.
Re: [Bragging] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sdematt
You realize this is going down at Denver, right? It just has to.
-Matt
Matt, if I make it to Denver I'll bring a deck. Are we using http://oldschool-mtg.blogspot.com/p/banrestriction.html rules? Reprints (except for unlimited) are not allowed.
Re: [Bragging] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jjflipped
I would be fine with that.
-Matt
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Important question re 93/94.
If I am at one life, can I use a city of brass, go to zero, then mirror universe for the win?
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
saspook
Important question re 93/94.
If I am at one life, can I use a city of brass, go to zero, then mirror universe for the win?
Of course you can. Also, REB from alpha is unplayable. Interrupts are strictly enforced.
The time wasted in 1997 learning the Interrupt Bubbles will finally pay off.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
So I have been testing 93-94 magic on Cockatrice and its a blast. I would probably drop Type1 for it if there was a stronger player base here in the US with tournaments and such, but for now it wont happen.
I have a small pile of stuff for it, but unfortunately all of my duallands are revised as I didn't care to spend the extra amount at the time I was picking them up. But here is some of the other stuff I have..
http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/v...-05-28_139.jpg
Why is it that revised is not one of the sets allowed? I mean, it was printed in early 1994 wasn't it?
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kratos
So I have been testing 93-94 magic on Cockatrice and its a blast. I would probably drop Type1 for it if there was a stronger player base here in the US with tournaments and such, but for now it wont happen.
I have a small pile of stuff for it, but unfortunately all of my duallands are revised as I didn't care to spend the extra amount at the time I was picking them up. But here is some of the other stuff I have..
http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/v...-05-28_139.jpg
Why is it that revised is not one of the sets allowed? I mean, it was printed in early 1994 wasn't it?
It was, and it was also printed before Legends and The Dark.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
I think looser enforcement is fine if your player group can't afford the other versions. I'd rather have fun than have zero players.
-Matt
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
sdematt
I think looser enforcement is fine if your player group can't afford the other versions. I'd rather have fun than have zero players.
-Matt
Ditto! Here in Halifax, there is a group of 10-12 people who have interest, but only have Revised duals. We've added Revised as a whole, just to ease the cost of entry.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mini1337s
Ditto! Here in Halifax, there is a group of 10-12 people who have interest, but only have Revised duals. We've added Revised as a whole, just to ease the cost of entry.
Here in Toronto we will allow any reprint in order to have enough players. If you can organize a tournament in Hallifax I will definitely come to play it. 93/94 format is way more fun than Type 1.
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
I think that our homepage might explain it but basicly there is no "real" reason why Revised shouldn't be allowed. The creators have choosen not to allow it simply because of the "pimp"-factor. They wanted more of an old-school format and I personaly hate the look of rev-duals but I can definatly understand why people choose to play with them.
Also, here is my decklist from our recent event, I made it to the finals but we didn't have time to play the finals (but it will be at a later event, I'm trying to get people to film it). We were around 25 players or so.
4 Tundra
4 Volcanic Island
2 Underground Sea
4 Mishra's Factory
1 Library of Alexandria
1 Strip Mine
3 City of Brass
1 Maze of Ith
4 Swords to Plowshares
3 Disenchant
1 Divine Offering
4 Mana Drain
4 Counterspell
1 Ancestral Recall
1 Recall
1 Time Walk
1 Braingeyser
1 Mind Twist
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Lightning Bolt
2 Fireball
1 Mox Pearl
1 Mox Sapphire
1 Mox Jet
1 Mox Ruby
1 Mox Emerald
1 Sol Ring
4 Fellwar Stone
2 Disruptive Scepter
3 Jaymaede Tome
SB:
1 Disenchant
1 Divine Offering
2 Greater Realm of Preservation
4 Red Elemental Blast
4 Blue Elemental Blast
1 Control Magic
1 Balance
1 Giant Shark (This is a requirement since I won a signed one in a tournament before, every time you win a signed Shark you have to play it.)
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
elof
I think that our homepage might explain it but basicly there is no "real" reason why Revised shouldn't be allowed. The creators have choosen not to allow it simply because of the "pimp"-factor. They wanted more of an old-school format and I personaly hate the look of rev-duals but I can definatly understand why people choose to play with them.
Also, here is my decklist from our recent event, I made it to the finals but we didn't have time to play the finals (but it will be at a later event, I'm trying to get people to film it). We were around 25 players or so.
4 Tundra
4 Volcanic Island
2 Underground Sea
4 Mishra's Factory
1 Library of Alexandria
1 Strip Mine
3 City of Brass
1 Maze of Ith
4 Swords to Plowshares
3 Disenchant
1 Divine Offering
4 Mana Drain
4 Counterspell
1 Ancestral Recall
1 Recall
1 Time Walk
1 Braingeyser
1 Mind Twist
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Lightning Bolt
2 Fireball
1 Mox Pearl
1 Mox Sapphire
1 Mox Jet
1 Mox Ruby
1 Mox Emerald
1 Sol Ring
4 Fellwar Stone
2 Disruptive Scepter
3 Jaymaede Tome
SB:
1 Disenchant
1 Divine Offering
2 Greater Realm of Preservation
4 Red Elemental Blast
4 Blue Elemental Blast
1 Control Magic
1 Balance
1 Giant Shark (This is a requirement since I won a signed one in a tournament before, every time you win a signed Shark you have to play it.)
Thanks for the list, I could not find it on http://oldschool-mtg.blogspot.ca/. Why not take a nice picture of the deck too and post it her :P !
Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nicolasbol
Here in Toronto we will allow any reprint in order to have enough players. If you can organize a tournament in Hallifax I will definitely come to play it. 93/94 format is way more fun than Type 1.
Sadly I think I have too many korean cards to make a deck :|