Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
I just ordered my own playset but I have to agree it is a retarded design. And it just kills so many other archetypes
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
lol, I could count the number of competitive archetypes "killed" by TNN on one amputated hand.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bjholmes3
lol, I could count the number of competitive archetypes "killed" by TNN on one amputated hand.
So... 5? ;)
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mini1337s
So... 5? ;)
Technically it could be any number between 0 and 5 ;)
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MGB
Every deck had an "answer" to Survival of the Fittest and Mystical Tutor as well. That doesn't mean they were healthy for the format or added anything positive, and then were rightfully banned.
What answer did non-blue decks have to Mystical Tutor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bjholmes3
lol, I could count the number of competitive archetypes "killed" by TNN on one amputated hand.
Yeah that's an interesting point, what decks are now invalidated by TNN that were real decks to begin with?
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dontbiteitholmes
What answer did non-blue decks have to Mystical Tutor?
Lammastide Weave.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dontbiteitholmes
What answer did non-blue decks have to Mystical Tutor?
Surgical Extraction? After all, Mystical Tutor is card disadvantage, while on the other hand Extraction creates some sort of virtual card advantage…
Edit: Do you mean when Tutor was legal? Then I don't have a clue… Extirpate maybe.
Btw before seeing TNN gone, I'd like to see this kind of threads gone from the source.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kiblast
Edit: Do you mean when Tutor was legal? Then I don't have a clue…
I know
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dontbiteitholmes
I know
I see what you did there… well but I guess nobody can argue about that banning… I mean that call was not hard at all it was a no brainer.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apple713
Its not banworthy but its poor design. It improved midranged decks which didnt really need help
This is what confuses me the most about the printing of the card. R&D decided to print a legacy playable card so they looked at the format and thought hey you know what could really use a good card midrange blue decks because they could really use some help.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
True-Name Nemesis is ass, but it isn't oppressive yet. If there comes a time when the only way anyone makes top 16 with a creature deck is by playing Nemesis then we can talk about bannings.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dzra
True-Name Nemesis is ass, but it isn't oppressive yet. If there comes a time when the only way anyone makes top 16 with a creature deck is by playing Nemesis then we can talk about bannings.
Which is what actually happened in the last big tournaments since TNN became legal... Decks making Top8 were mostly "Combo", "TNN" or e few exceptions like some DnT lists which are naturally good against TNN...
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
bjholmes3
I love this. Legacy is not the place for people who have the EDH play-weak-crap-but-still-try-to-secretly-win-through-not-"cheap"-"op"-"unfun"-shenanigans "Gentlemen" mindset.
Except that EDH is play-retarded-crap-but-still-try-to-force-other-people-to-play-weak-crap-that-doesn't-interfere-with-your-"cheap"-"op"-"unfun"-shenanigans. Every time someone tries to win in EDH, he's acting against da spirit of da format.
"Dude, Stone Rain is unfun and overpowered, if you wish to stay part of our community, refrain from using such cheap tactics that's against da spirit, ok? Fine. Now: Tooth and Nail into Kiki-Jiki/Titan."
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
the R&D team threw us a candy.
and here we are complaining about the fact that the card is overpowered and broken.
Isn't that a pre-requesite for a card to reach a playable format in legacy?
Instead of being whiny little bitches and complain about a card that seems to have found is place in a pretty elitist and selective format, let's just find way to beat it!
How could I, a non-blue player, find way to play and beat TNN decks in DC?
Let's just simply put our brains to good use for once.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kayradis
and here we are complaining about the fact that the card is overpowered and broken.
That's a poor description of the complaints about TNN. And for many, it's a representation of a larger issue. And, many of these people welcome more powerful and interesting cards entering and shaking up the format, and forcing people to use their brains.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
I actually don't want to see this guy gone, even if it is dominant. Any fair (non-combo) card making RUG less popular is welcome by me.
I'd still rather see Delver gone. Fuck that card.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kayradis
the R&D team threw us a candy.
and here we are complaining about the fact that the card is overpowered and broken.
Isn't that a pre-requesite for a card to reach a playable format in legacy?
Instead of being whiny little bitches and complain about a card that seems to have found is place in a pretty elitist and selective format, let's just find way to beat it!
How could I, a non-blue player, find way to play and beat TNN decks in DC?
Let's just simply put our brains to good use for once.
the candy in this case is a vomit flavored jelly bean. Terrible design and idea. Worst of all its blue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shawon
I actually don't want to see this guy gone, even if it is dominant. Any fair (non-combo) card making RUG less popular is welcome by me.
I'd still rather see Delver gone. Fuck that card.
The issue is that if you want to play aggro now, you are pretty much forced into blue. or i guess you could play DnT or goblins... so really just DnT. Why has blue become one of the best aggro colors, control colors, and combo colors....reallly WOTC? There motto should be "there is no color pie"
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apple713
the candy in this case is a vomit flavored jelly bean. Terrible design and idea. Worst of all its blue.
Why are you complaining? You play Show and Tell, don't you just ignore this card?
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apple713
the candy in this case is a vomit flavored jelly bean. Terrible design and idea. Worst of all its blue.
The issue is that if you want to play aggro now, you are pretty much forced into blue. or i guess you could play DnT or goblins... so really just DnT. Why has blue become one of the best aggro colors, control colors, and combo colors....reallly WOTC? There motto should be "there is no color pie"
The day before TNN became legal, exactly which non-blue "aggro" decks were consistently Tier 1? Aside from goblins and elves, I really don't remember there being any.
Re: Would you like to see True-Name Nemesis gone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Star|Scream
The day before TNN became legal, exactly which non-blue "aggro" decks were consistently Tier 1? Aside from goblins and elves, I really don't remember there being any.
People like to think that Maverick, Rock and Jund were/are competitive decks.