-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
@qweerios, I tried your previous bug list with a couple of tweaks versus a miracles deck. We did 5 test games (all preboard) and I lost each one. Some of the main problems I encountered were jace, clique/karakas combo, and ironically, counterbalance. The root of the problem all started with him landing a jace and subsequently countering my pulses. He then ended up floating a 5 and 6 with countertop in one game, basically locking me out of my threats. Another game he got by using clique/karakas to protect jace while floating a 3 with balance to counter deed/pulse.
The matchup felt rather difficult as fow basically become another hardcastable counterspell after 1-2 turns and a resolved jace just gives them enough counters to close out the game (terminus also deals with thrun rather nicely). I should mention that I didn't get to resolve a therapy in any of the matches (either not drawn at all or was locked out by balance), but I was wondering how you dealt with jace.
Another concern was that I was rarely happy to draw a liliana in this matchup--miracles have more tops than nic fit as well as a greater capacity to topdeck something amazing (entreat/terminus). In general, the symmetrical discard felt lackluster without loam or fires to break that symmetry. Perhaps I'm using her wrong as the only decks I've used her in had those elements to turn her +1 into card advantage.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Qweerios I know you're a pretty staunch supporter of the no Dryad Arbor camp. I'm curious about the presence of Birds of Paradise in your new BUG list. One of your arguments against the Arbor was because you can usually just wait to Zenith for 1 and get an Explorer. When are you Zenithing for Birds instead? Is it for Merfolk to tap for blue without needing to fetch an Island? Blocker for Delver? Just curious about your reasoning.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Me too. We don't run any equipment to make use of the flying, and chumping delver for one turn doesn't seem all that appealing. Why not at least go with an elf that can kill a regular delver and can still ping your opponent?
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Oh and I forgot to suggest to BlackMetalSheep try out Diabolic Intent in that Innocent Blood slot!
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoneyT
Oh and I forgot to suggest to BlackMetalSheep try out Diabolic Intent in that Innocent Blood slot!
Yeah, I have already play 2x Diabolic Intent in GBw versione and I try it in the Innocent slot because I always want 6 sac-outlet!! ;)
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
@Qweerios Do you consider 2 Thragtusk to always be overkill? I always like playing control decks with just barely enough threats to win the game, but I've ran into multiple situations where my one Thragtusk gets swordsed and when I'm GSZing again I really want a second. For this reason, I've been using 2 Thragtusk and enjoying it.
Another thing I would like to ask people: a lot of the time when I play a Liliana I am very reluctant to use her discard ability, because it often ends up where I have one or two cards in my hand, at least one of which is a Thragtusk/Titan, and my opponent has four cards in hand. Therefore, the discard ability hurts me more than my opponent. Am I wrong? Is it better to just hope that I topdeck another threat/witness soon enough? I understand that we're better at topdecking than most, but this always seems like I'm making myself topdeck while they still have options. Should I just not use Liliana during one of these turns?
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ayotte
@Qweerios Do you consider 2 Thragtusk to always be overkill? I always like playing control decks with just barely enough threats to win the game, but I've ran into multiple situations where my one Thragtusk gets swordsed and when I'm GSZing again I really want a second. For this reason, I've been using 2 Thragtusk and enjoying it.
Another thing I would like to ask people: a lot of the time when I play a Liliana I am very reluctant to use her discard ability, because it often ends up where I have one or two cards in my hand, at least one of which is a Thragtusk/Titan, and my opponent has four cards in hand. Therefore, the discard ability hurts me more than my opponent. Am I wrong? Is it better to just hope that I topdeck another threat/witness soon enough? I understand that we're better at topdecking than most, but this always seems like I'm making myself topdeck while they still have options. Should I just not use Liliana during one of these turns?
Ayotte, you're still on Scapewish, right? The rules are a little different for Scapewish than for other versions, I feel. I strongly believe that 2 Thragtusks is correct for that version, and periodically have even entertained the idea of adding a 3rd. Thragtusk is not just an effective beatstick for Scapewish, it also buys you an inordinate amount of time, and really time is all Scapewish needs to win. If it can live long enough, it -will- kill you. That's one reason among many why I defend Huntmaster so voraciously.
I could see running double Tusk in BUG, but I think that's a bit of a stretch, and you can probably do better things. I also agree with virtually everything that Qweerios said about BUG in his last post.
As for Liliana, you're not the only one that feels that way, Ayotte. That's all I'm going to say because I don't want to spark that debate AGAIN. My advice would be that if you don't feel she's pulling her weight, cut her.
@Birds of Paradise -- Pretty sure this is adapted technology that I adopted from Paul Ewenstein when I met him at GP Boston. He'd put a Noble Hierarch into his BUG Fit deck, primarily because it improved the Merfolk matchup enormously (you have access to blue mana without needing islands, and usually BUG Fit only needs 1x Island unless you're dropping Jace and winning on the spot). It also provides a mana dork that can be Zenithed for when you don't have a sac outlet for the Explorer and/or are up vs a matchup where you don't really want Explorer g1. Paul preferred Hierarch because of the fringe benefit of having an Exalted trigger that you can Zenith out when you need an extra point of damage, whereas I believe Qweerios is siding with Birds because it produces black. Birds seems fine to me.
@Qweerios -- Speaking in Magic theory terms, I would add a 5th category to the zones that Nic Fit can interact with: library. I'm referring specifically to Cranial Extraction and Memoricide here. Attacking the actual deck can be highly relevant in some matchups, to the point where it can just straight win the matchup for you. BUG Fit is the only deck that I can think of that can actually attack on all 5 angles simultaneously, which is pretty cool IMO.
As for your latest list, are you planning on putting in Abrupt Decays/Vraska? I know you were talking about it a while ago, but since they aren't there now, I'm not sure if you decided against them for some reason. What are you planning on dropping for them, if you're still putting them in?
Also, has E. Plague been better than just straight sweepers for you? I'm thinking specifically of something like Infest that would kill Teeg, Revoker (while ignoring Mom), and other various pains in the ass. E. Plague won't do anything to like Merfolk, but Infest might...both are obviously blowouts vs Goblins and Elves. I don't think Damnation is correct for the backup sweeper, but I do question E. Plague. How has Dust Bowl been since you don't have Loam anymore to abuse it?
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
The reason I like Damnation over infest in the SB is because Infest does nothing against Opposing KOTR or if a merfolk player has multiple lords out. This is one thing I have been struggling with. I dont know what my back up sweeper should be in GB.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Her eis what I run atm. I had the Trinket Mage version for a while and Abrupt Decay was exactly what the deck needed. Can't ask for more than efficient 2-drop-removal that still ignores Spell Snare. Pulse was too slow and Doom Blades and the others too inconsistent.
I like Trinket Mage more than 2 addional Zeniths because it gives a lot of flexibility. With Explosives, Spellbomb and Top you always have something good in G1 and in G2 it can even grab Chalice/Crypt for more efficient Combo/Yard hate and Needle to fight all sorts of things (Top, Planeswalkers). It also lets you profit more from Primeval Titan when he gets Academy Ruins + Volrath's Stronghold.
A 2/2 split between Damnation and Deed has been working out good. Damnation is more efficient at killing creatures and Decay lets you handle some of the other stuff they might play. It also goes around D&Ts annoying Revoker/Mother of Runes combo. I'd almost always rather draw 1 Deed / 1 Damnation than 2 Deeds and usually it makes no big difference which one it is if I only draw 1.
// Lands
3 [ZEN] Misty Rainforest
3 [ZEN] Verdant Catacombs
2 [ON] Polluted Delta
2 [B] Underground Sea
2 [B] Tropical Island
2 [B] Bayou
2 [B] Forest
2 [B] Swamp
2 [B] Island
1 [US] Phyrexian Tower
1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
1 [SH] Volrath's Stronghold
// Creatures
4 [WL] Veteran Explorer
2 [SOM] Trinket Mage
1 [M12] Acidic Slime
1 [CMD] Eternal Witness
1 [M13] Thragtusk
1 [M12] Primeval Titan
// Spells
2 [MBS] Green Sun's Zenith
3 [WWK] Jace, the Mind Sculptor
1 [RTR] Vraska the Unseen
4 [JU] Cabal Therapy
3 [LRW] Thoughtseize
2 [AP] Pernicious Deed
2 [PLC] Damnation
3 [RTR] Abrupt Decay
4 [IA] Brainstorm
1 [SOM] Nihil Spellbomb
1 [FD] Engineered Explosives
1 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
// Sideboard
SB: 3 [US] Carpet of Flowers
SB: 3 [M11] Negate
SB: 2 [UL] Engineered Plague
SB: 1 [CMD] Scavenging Ooze
SB: 1 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
SB: 1 [TSB] Tormod's Crypt
SB: 1 [SOK] Pithing Needle
SB: 1 [MR] Chalice of the Void
SB: 1 [TSP] Krosan Grip
SB: 1 [PLC] Extirpate
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
I actually really like the look of that Trinket Mage toolbox aswell as the list as a whole.
I'll post the Planeswalkers centered Gifts version i'm playing atm as soon as i have some more time.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
More than anything I love a good Trinket Mage toolbox. I would totally play that list if I had the lands for it. How good is chalice of the void really for this deck though? We do tand to have some key 1 drops.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Me too. Both Explosives and Top are really good in this deck and a Spellbomb won't hurt.
Chalice is not meant as a value card against cantrips. It is there against Storm Combo and Belcher so that you can Trinket Mage and immediately set it at 0 to shut down Lotus Petal, Chrome Mox and LED. It can also come in against Burn and be set on 1. I wouldn't fault you for taking it out if you don't expect any Storm, it is not a key card.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Viridia
I actually really like the look of that Trinket Mage toolbox aswell as the list as a whole.
I'll post the Planeswalkers centered Gifts version i'm playing atm as soon as i have some more time.
I'm very interested in seeing this. I still haven't figured out a good gifts list with abrupt decay.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
22 Lands
2 Bayou
3 Forest
3 Island
2 Misty Rainforest
2 Phyrexian Tower
2 Polluted Delta
2 Swamp
1 Tropical Island
1 Underground Sea
4 Verdant Catacombs
11 Creatures
4 Baleful Strix
1 Consecrated Sphinx
2 Eternal Witness
4 Veteran Explorer
22 Other spells
2 Abrupt Decay
4 Brainstorm
4 Cabal Therapy
1 Diabolic Intent
2 Gifts Ungiven
1 Maelstrom Pulse
4 Pernicious Deed
1 Recurring Nightmare
3 Sensei's Divining Top
5 Planeswalkers
1 Garruk, Primal Hunter
3 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
1 Karn Liberated
Sideboard (15)
3 Vendilion Clique
3 Carpet of Flowers
1 Maelstrom Pulse
1 Memoricide
3 Surgical Extraction
1 Telemin Performance
3 Thoughtseize
It seems to work quite well, need to test vs Miracles tho, having uncounterable removal for Clique/Counterbalance is quite good tho, aswell as another Pulse and Carpet in the side.
The deck usually ends the game with atleast 2 Walkers on the field, simply because it needs them to win, and is pretty much build to get them online.
I'm thinking of putting in Liliana of Vraska, but i'm not sure yet what to cut as i've been really happy with Karn lately, even at its cmc of 7.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
@Viridia -- Telemin Performance is hilarious. I like it.
Is Nightmare good enough in this deck? I'm fully aware that turning it into a draw engine with Strix is quite good, but I feel like there should be something else to do with it. It might be more efficacious just to cut it for a Vraska, to further emphasize your walker package. Alternatively, you could put in a Keiga and take all of the things...
You could also pursue a slight transformational board, with Jarad's Orders into Body Double + fatty. Would only take something like 4 slots, (2 Orders, 1 BD, 1 fatty), and could work with Gifts with a little tinkering as well, if you don't draw into the Orders. It's a thought...not sure how good it is, but there it is. Probably better than Clique.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
The Nightmare is mainly to be able to Gifts for Witness/Nightmare/Walker/Walker(Sphinx)
I've had alot of Gifts Piles where people just gave me the Walker/Walker because else i'd also have the Nightmare/Witness engine online. It's mainly there to make sure your Walkers are never going anywhere but into hand->play.
Keiga is actually a good idea i might test that.
Also Orders into Body Double + fatty sounds good, however people probably allready side in graveyard hate :(
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
It's a very interesting take on it. No GSZ to speak of. If you do keep the recurring nightmare, perhaps switch the consecrated sphinx for a sphinx of uthuun? It gets you 1-4 cards immediately each time you recur.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
I never thought of that, might be better then Consecrated Sphinx, i'll try it out as soon as i got some time.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
@Tao
Did you test against Goblins? It's still one of the harder matchups as far as i am concerned even if you know what to do with Therapies etc. you will eventually be overwhelmed by the green men. Chieftain + Krenko + Piledriver can one-shot you out of nowhere.
Engineered Plagues seem narrow and need to be doubled to really affect them. Is there anything else besides Crawlspace?
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Viridia
The Nightmare is mainly to be able to Gifts for Witness/Nightmare/Walker/Walker(Sphinx)
I've had alot of Gifts Piles where people just gave me the Walker/Walker because else i'd also have the Nightmare/Witness engine online. It's mainly there to make sure your Walkers are never going anywhere but into hand->play.
Keiga is actually a good idea i might test that.
Also Orders into Body Double + fatty sounds good, however people probably allready side in graveyard hate :(
Do they really? Looking at your list, I wouldn't side in gy hate vs it...only if I had a lot of dead cards and wanted to trade up for marginal value. Also, even if they have gy hate, you still tutor for something to hand -- and B.Double can take things out of your opp's gy, too, if they Crypt you or some such. And that makes sense RE Nightmare -- I'd still like to see one or two other things to really get some solid abuse going, but that's certainly fair. Could also put in a 1x Green Sun to throw into Gifts piles -- people would be pretty scared of it, and it would let you go Gifts -> GSZ, Witness, Nightmare, X, ensuring that you get all 4 cards (eventually), and that you get your Witness engine set up in one shot.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlackStarDeceiver
@Tao
Did you test against Goblins? It's still one of the harder matchups as far as i am concerned even if you know what to do with Therapies etc. you will eventually be overwhelmed by the green men. Chieftain + Krenko + Piledriver can one-shot you out of nowhere.
Engineered Plagues seem narrow and need to be doubled to really affect them. Is there anything else besides Crawlspace?
Good point.
Like you said G1 against Goblins is a lot about Cabal Therapy to take out their Matron/Ringleader engine. Unless you would really die to Warchief or Piledriver you should always nuke their draw engine and take a bit of damage. Thoughtseizs can also do that if they only have one.
The game is often that you take quite a bit early damage, then nuke the board and they have 2-3 turns to topdeck a Ringleader/Matron while you are busy finishing their remains and setting up your engine. If they don't and you have untapped with a stable board and Jace or Primeval in play then you win. If you can't prevent them from going nuts with Ringleaders or they kill you before you can clean the board then they win. I like the matchup, it is pretty fun and using Explorers correctly is challenging because brainlessly ramping will often result in them killing you in one big attack. Sometimes you just have to go for it, other times it is correct to hold it back.
For the SB Plague is insanely good against Goblins if you find room in the SB. Don't believe rumours it would be not good or that it is only good if you draw two of them, that is nonsence. One alone kills all Lackeys, War Marshalls, Matrons, SGC/Krenko tokens, Instigators and severely weakens the rest. Unless you draw only lands this is usually wrecking enough that you can take the game easily. Crawlspace (or any Artifact for that matter) is useless against a deck that can Matron for Tuktuk Scrapper and it is worse than Plague to begin with.
So with Goblins in the Meta in the USA I should probably replace the Virtue's Ruin with Engineered Plagues. It is also okay against Maverick / D&T. I edited my list because I forgot about the Goblin trend in SCGs.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
I tested the matchup from the Goblin side and managed to win several games against a singleton Plague, though i think it might be more shifted against some random player at a tourney who either just goes for Krenko -> win! or doesn't know how to interact with Nic Fit style decks properly.
The point you made about using Explorers correctly come up more often by now anyways, as Miracles and Blade may use the mana.
What are our opinions on Memoricide? I'd love to play Slaughter Games but i want to remain in BUG. The real threat that Miracles has against us are Entreats as we play our own Jaces. But Explosives may be unrealiable if UW plays any of them as well preventing us from setting Explosives 0 preemptively.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Damnation.
Kev Walker is an unfavorable match up for Goblins.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Sure if you follow up with the other cards and apply pressure fast enough it works, otherwise it's about the same situation as for Miracles. Enough mana and Ringleader/Matron refuel their game pretty effectively.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
somethingdotdotdot
@qweerios, I tried your previous bug list with a couple of tweaks versus a miracles deck. We did 5 test games (all preboard) and I lost each one. Some of the main problems I encountered were jace, clique/karakas combo, and ironically, counterbalance. The root of the problem all started with him landing a jace and subsequently countering my pulses. He then ended up floating a 5 and 6 with countertop in one game, basically locking me out of my threats. Another game he got by using clique/karakas to protect jace while floating a 3 with balance to counter deed/pulse.
The matchup felt rather difficult as fow basically become another hardcastable counterspell after 1-2 turns and a resolved jace just gives them enough counters to close out the game (terminus also deals with thrun rather nicely). I should mention that I didn't get to resolve a therapy in any of the matches (either not drawn at all or was locked out by balance), but I was wondering how you dealt with jace.
Another concern was that I was rarely happy to draw a liliana in this matchup--miracles have more tops than nic fit as well as a greater capacity to topdeck something amazing (entreat/terminus). In general, the symmetrical discard felt lackluster without loam or fires to break that symmetry. Perhaps I'm using her wrong as the only decks I've used her in had those elements to turn her +1 into card advantage.
G1 against Miracle is unfavorable for any control Nic Fit versions I've ever played. Explorer ramp is inherently flawed against MUs that can take advantage of those basics as well as we do.
@Ayotte,
Yes I think 2 Thragtusk is overkill. His primary purpose is to gain life and persist, not to seal a game (in some MUs its all you need sometimes). I prefer Shroud/Hexproof creatures for that purpose.
To answer the other questions;
-Decay will definitely find a home as a 2-4of in BUG Fit
-Birds is there for the blue mana against Merfolk and a T2 ramp in the absence of a sac outlet
-E Plague helps against the recurrence of goblins. Their ability to refuel makes sweepers less than ideal
@Tao,
Welcome back! I had completely forgotten about your Trinket Mage tech that you suggested at the begining of the thread. I think Trinket is BUG's Rector and I have been looking for a way to include an Academy Ruins engine in the deck. I am looking forward to finding a good Trinket package.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Qweerios, still wondering what the birds does over hierarch or a mana elf besides block a delver or emrakul?
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
They work with Engineered Plague on Human and they make black mana as opposed to Hierarchs ^^
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
It grants double black for a T2 Liliana
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
May I ask why faith's fetters over oblivion ring in rector version? fetters doesn't do shit against omniscience and elesh norn and probably other cards too that I can't think of right now.
And for that matter, as deed doesn't blow up planeswalkers it doesn't rly matter if u have o-ring or fetters on a walker
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Fetters can hit creatures with Shroud/Hexproof, like Thrun and hitting a walker with Fetters prevents them from dropping a second one.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
litenkatt
May I ask why faith's fetters over oblivion ring in rector version? fetters doesn't do shit against omniscience and elesh norn and probably other cards too that I can't think of right now.
And for that matter, as deed doesn't blow up planeswalkers it doesn't rly matter if u have o-ring or fetters on a walker
What BlackStar put, but a few more notes too:
-) If you have a heavy Show and Tell presence in your meta, O-Ring is better. Fetters is better against literally everything else.
-) 4 life is not insignificant, and that 4 life has saved my ass on more occasions than I really care to admit. There have been games vs RUG in particular where I'd fetch it to stick on a land just to gain the life....as they topdeck a bolt that would have been lethal next turn.
-) CMC 4 vs CMC 3 is a huge deal where Deed is concerned. 3 is a commonly used number (something something KotR), whereas 4 is almost never hit. Sure, Deed won't hit 'walkers, but it will hit the enchantment that you're locking them down with.
-) As BSD noted, it shuts down the walker in question basically permanently, because since it's still "in play," the offending deck would have to play a 2nd (to legend rule the first), and then a 3rd before actually representing the same threat. If you O-Ring it, they can just drop another copy, with the 3rd still in deck. Sure, you can kill your O-Ring then to legend rule them, but it makes you jump through another hoop...and who knows what damage the 2nd copy has done while in play.
-) A fringe benefit that people -always- forget about is that you can also use it to lock down offensive lands that we otherwise have virtually no way of interacting with (Vindicate). Turning off Maze of Ith, Academy Ruins, etc can be absolutely huge.
-) Lack of ability to respond. If you're up against Miracle Top, and you really, really need to shut down their Top for some strange reason, you can do that with Fetters, but you can't with O-Ring. If you Rector O-Ring, they can respond to the trigger. If you do Fetters, it comes in attached to the permanent: if they didn't respond to the Rector trigger, there's no way for them to respond at that point. No drawing off Top, no activating Ruins in response, no Bolting their Delver so you don't gain 4 life.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Fetter is actually surprisingly good.
I see what you guys are saying about engineered plague... How many do you think I should run in GB in the SB? Last time I played at my LGS I saw 2 or 3 Folk decks and a couple of goblins as well. So about 20% of my LGS meta. Also is siding them vs Maverick any good? Naming human kills of Hierarchs and Moms while shrinking Knight
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qweerios
It grants double black for a T2 Liliana
okay got it.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
EPlague on humans also directly turns Explorer into ramp.
As far as the Trinket package go, what other maindeck 1CMC artifacts are worth it besides Nihil Spellbomb, Top, and EE? So far I have, Executioner's Capsule and maybe Darksteel Citadel
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Qweerios
EPlague on humans also directly turns Explorer into ramp.
As far as the Trinket package go, what other maindeck 1CMC artifacts are worth it besides Nihil Spellbomb, Top, and EE? So far I have, Executioner's Capsule and maybe Darksteel Citadel
None I think. My list is pretty good^^
I didn't include Capsule because there is not much it can shoot that Explosives can't and I really can't find any room in the list. I wouldn't fault you for playing it, tough. It can get Knight of the Reliquary if you don't have the time or mana for EE on 3 or a random fattie like Hero of Bladehold.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tao
None I think. My list is pretty good^^
I didn't include Capsule because there is not much it can shoot that Explosives can't and I really can't find any room in the list. I wouldn't fault you for playing it, tough. It can get Knight of the Reliquary if you don't have the time or mana for EE on 3 or a random fattie like Hero of Bladehold.
It can lie in wait against Emrakul. It can even be fetched by a trinket mage off of an SNT
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
To take some tech from Death and Taxes, roll with Leonin Bola as a 1cc artifact to humiliate Show and Tell.
-
Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)
If we're talking Trinket Mage (and ExCap/EE), there needs to be a Glissa, the Traitor IMO. She's a 1-card engine and she's almost playable just by herself as a 3/3, Zenithable Moat.