Quote:
Originally Posted by
Draconicsteel
Our deck shouldn't be too afraid of anti-X/1 spells. In fact, I put some Zealous Persecutions in my own board, which in itself is answer to a Zealous Persecution/Golgari Charm. But all of our big guys don't care. And if your guys are going to die, just sac them all to Ravager or something. I also play Masters (2), though, because I just think his threat level is too good to be ignored.
SB Persecution is pretty interesting. How did it work out against The Nemesis?
Quote:
I really like one of Jitte main board, by the way - helps shore up the fair matches. Against Merfolk game one, I landed a SFM, searched up Jitte, resolved Champion, and next turn when I attacked he just scooped. Jitte just kills so many other decks, I definitely prefer that over a mainboard Batterskull.
When I tested MD Jitte, what I didn't like about it was that if you are resetting your offense, Jitte isn't particular stellar if you are starting from ground zero. This is why I decided to keep Batterskull instead of Jitte, because with Batterskull, it is always a creature no matter what. Jitte is amazing when it connects, but without any charge counters on it, you can't equip something like Ornithopter or Signal Pest and expect to gain any counters. Jitte is still good, but I've had so many hit-or-miss moments with Jitte that I decided to not bother with it.
Quote:
Also, while the card itself may be retarded, I kind of like what TNN has done for the format. The number of fair decks has been significantly increased, and our deck is generally really good, or at least very competitive with, fair decks.
I think the only way The Nemesis directly affects Affinity is that no matter many creatures you have to protect Tezz, if an opponent has TNN already in play, your opponent can stop you from activating the ultimate simply by safely attacking Tezz. It's not a big deal, but that caveat should be noted.