Originally Posted by
I am the brainwasher
"SD is a good question. I have no clue about the most played decktypes in my area, but Vexing Shusher and Pyrostatic Pillar seem very important and probably are going to be 4-of. I also like Searing Blaze, specially with fetches.
Is Volcanic Fallout that important? I already have 4 but never used them...."
Volcanic Fallout is more or less important against all sort of Tribla decks, especially Goblins and Merfolk (Elves hasnt seen much play in my area and is definetly more rare, Burning Keycards is also a lot more hurting to them than other Tribals, thats my impression as far as I tested this MU). Running 2-3 is fine, if its needed depends completely on your meta but its also very useful against all kind of decks that spam the board with small bananas (Mana accelerators, utility creeps like Mother of the Runes, and stuff, also most Affinity lists) and offers very good trades.
Towards Pyrostatic pillar:
I am so confused about the card. I found myself just getting slapped by combo after turn 1 Duress so often that I nearly come to the conclusion that its not worth boarding. Sure, this is a bit exaggerated but it happens so damn often that I am kinda disappointed by the card itself. I am really thinking about dropping and playing Tormods Crypt instead. Crypt sets them off the Ill-gotten Gains loop and Ad Nauseum isnt THE plan against burn that you might have better chances with it than Pillar because beeing able to Tutorchain with Infernal isnt the typical play (even if they prefer it IF its possible).
Another upside is that you strenghten your Dredge MU which is horrible to be honest. Against an experienced player you wont come very far against Ancestors Chosen/Iona because they rape your hand with Therapy naming Vortex (Chosen is obviously weak with it) or Volcanic Fallout (Fireblast when youre ahead in the race). I would be glad to test those 4 Slots out some more because beeing so unimpressed by Pillar after testing intense against good pilots of ANT and TES.
IMO the chances of stealing a game via Crypt is nearly equal to Pillar and so it makes definetly more sense to me playing it instead. The minimal use against other decks that spit out many spells in one round isnt enough to convinve me to be honest.
Towards Shusher:
I play them as a 4 of back when CB was a DTB but luckily the number of the deck has dropped due to the Printing of Green Suns Zenith and the ridicoulous mana courve of decks like Affiniy which see tons of play atm. He is still a fine choice but I am pretty happy with a split of 3/1 or 2/2 of Smash to Smithereens (Shattering Spree is NOT necessary against neither StaXXX (Chalice Trini) like decks nor Affinity with the additional sb cards and Vortex) and Shusher and I would just play the whole playset of em if your meta is heavy blue. The thing is that another Bear can be awesome agaist Leyline but I think the decks that play those can handle creeps as well and so its not that convincing, bad that Anarchy is cc4... .
I play the following sb atm:
4 Tormods Crypt
4 Searing Blaze
3 Volcanic Fallout
3 Smash to Smithereens
1 Vewxing Shusher
If you lack money for lavamancer and Chain Lightning you could assume that playing Searing Blaze maindeck and Spark Elemental could do a favour to you.
Greetings, youre welcome on criticising me on Crypt, discussion is progress!