Search:

Type: Posts; User: Bluehen28

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Ha no issue. You guys have been a big help
  2. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Awesome that's what I thought.
  3. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Yes but if they respond with a second removal to your activation that will resolve first before your initial sac
  4. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Correct me if I'm wrong . Lands can be sacked to safekeepers at instant speed in response to multiple swords stifle ect. Swords your token, response Sack a land, response second sword, response Sack...
  5. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Makes sense. Also seen Dryad Arbor in the board in some lists
  6. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    DNSolver thanks for the input. Looks like I'll be ordering traps lol. One other question why the switch to safekeepers over not of this world?
  7. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,154,989

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Thinking of running turbo depths this weekend for th e SCG open in DC. Couple questions on the deck and sideboard options. Expedition maps vs into the north or a mix what's the reason for one vs the...
Results 1 to 7 of 7