Search:

Very interesting, since it can let you use and recast Remorseful Cleric, which might be good consider opposing Lurrus' and Uro (and the rest of the Graveyard shenanigans around today). Worth noting...

Unfortunately that is not how it works.



You can see the rule explained here.

It definitely has been done, I used to do it in the Treasure Cruise era and at times when people happened to be playing a lot of Storm around here. Never in place of Thalia though, she is the reason...

First rule of talking about Stonecloaker is "you don't talk about Stonecloaker's art."

Second rule of talking about Stonecloaker is "you don't talk about Stonecloaker's art."

Monkey's Paw there, you failed to say "and definitely don't make it 4."

Indeed, if I am going to play a beater that is Karakas-able, it'd probably be Brimaz, King Of Oreskos, but obviously that guy has other downsides too.

Like Resto, he has a lot of upsides versus...

And a BUG deck, of course.

I mean, it's not as terrible as it seems. That plus Flickerwisps would probably be pretty decent if you expect to be racing True-Names/facing Burn.

Personally, I'd hesitate to move right to GQ over Port. I honestly feel like Port is probably the second best card in D&T, behind Vial, and the fact that we can and do run it is a key to our...

Honestly, I am the least cerebral player on Earth in all probability. My intuition was to just jam the Canonist and so I think my post was me mainly seeing if there was actually a rational reason to...

Yeah, it was discussed many pages ago. I mean, it's one of those long shot things, but I guess maybe it's better than Mirran Crusader or something.

My feeling here is that jamming the second Canonist is what I would do, because if they do have double Petal and Decay (for the Needle), they still can't go off (Canonist) and they are still mana...

I think it might be fair to consider removing Mangara, since you are already pretty heavy on 3 drops.

I love Mangara myself, but recently came around to removing him, since it's often just too...

If I understand correctly, they still can't combo through an Ethersworn Canonist, right? So Canonist + Mom aught to be good.

It's a joke, they obviously mistyped it as Phyrexian Devourer instead of Revoker.

I'm really not sure you do get what I am saying though, because that is neither what I said, nor what I meant. Including 2 is perfectly reasonable. I never said the anything about needing to be...

I grasped thier point perfectly well, but unfortunately it is a refutation of something I never said. You also refute something I never said, so while you imagine you are clarifying thier point, you...

Yeah, that isn't what I am saying at all.

My point was simply that this deck might not be the best one to use THC to her maximum effect, because her effect is stronger the earlier you can play...

If it is true that THC is that good (and it may well be) if we want a deck that can maximize her potential, I think we shouldn't be looking at Death and Taxes, but rather decks that can accelerate...

It might be correct, or alright, in a sense, to go -1 THC and +1 Crusader if you expect lots of GB/X decks.

This looks like a pretty reasonable approach, I still think keeping some number of Serra Avenger is more correct than not, because Flying + Equipment is just too good to throw by the way-side. When...

I like your list, for the most part DarthVicious, although some numbers I would run different here or there. What I really like is keeping Serra Avenger. Flying is just too good to lose.



One...

Fair enough. Still think that Angel is just bad, no matter how tutorable.

Angel of Invention just looks bad. There are already a host of unplayble 4 mana cards that are better and still not worth it, i.e. Hero of Bladehold, Gisela, the Broken Blade, Celestial Crusader,...

Not much that would be ideal, I don't think:

Capashen Unicorn (Substantial mana investment, needs to tap and sac itself, but can hit Enchantments)

Goblin Tinkerer (lower mana investment, can...