Search:

Type: Posts; User: dte

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Taking the example of a wild nacatl deck is wrong. There are not that many cards that interact with land types in legacy: daze, by far the most important (and yes, a non-shadow daze deck with...
  2. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    FoW was not reprinted until very recently, without a big effect on its cost. You might have confused "reserve list" and "rare"?



    Those are two different arguments. In your first, you had that...
  3. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    I really doubt that would make legacy players happy. But it is a bit puzzling to me to argue on one hand that duals are absolutely needed, and on the other that they "function well"? They do the job...
  4. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    To not double down on a clear design mistake?
    From a gameplay perspective, ABUR duals are bad/boring. Modern databases are much more interesting both to play and to build, when you have to balance...
Results 1 to 4 of 4