Search:

Type: Posts; User: FourDogsinaHorseSuit

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Typed Fast Lands I think are in the realm of possibility but the issue is that they can't be too good because you shouldn't have 8 duals in the format/deck.
    So either you reprint duals, make...
  2. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    So in 2010 I could take a risk on duals when they were just over 200 and I could make it all back if I cashed the weekly SCG. Nowadays the risk to pay off those thousand dollar Seas is so high that...
  3. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    The difference in price has never been this high. Even before scg dropped legacy
  4. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    If the difference between a 60 card deck and a 62 one was a thousand bucks I'd run 62 every time.
  5. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    I think if UR delver replaced two of its three duals with shocks you would lose less than 3% of games because of it
    The only decks that are going to lose significant percentage points are the ones...
  6. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    These numbers are made up and bad (seriously, are you telling me one out of every ten games is decided by weather or not you paid two life to have a singular land in your deck, which you could have...
  7. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    There's so many stupid teams here I don't even know which one you're on.
    Wait are you in favor of printing RL cards because I thought you were on the opposite team.
  8. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Nope. Past collectable versions absolutely can drive modern prices. See: Sneakers.
  9. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Yes, you posted two conflicting meanings of your post because your argument doesn't work if they can make more cards, but then you pull a rehtorical trick where you use can and does interchangeably...
  10. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Actually they can. Thanks for playing.
  11. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Correct, I want it more but is it 100 times better? To justify the price tag I need to be earning $998 more than had I run Watery Grave instead.
  12. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Is an Undergroudn Sea 100 times better than a Watery Grave?
    Y/N
  13. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Yes. Because that is exactly what they are. A luxury good is any item whose price out scales its value. An Underground Sea is not one hundred times better than a Watery Grave, lol.
  14. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Hey, if an Underground Sea isn't a luxury good, what do you people think luxury goods even are?
  15. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Don't Sign Your Posts!
  16. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    We already have a shitty card creation thread
  17. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Oh my god I posted that without knowing you people filled up another page with this stupid slap fight.

    E: And it was a page because I just page sniped myself onto a new one. Now I have to make...
  18. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Don't sign your posts
  19. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Because they're a publicly traded company and need to have constant growth forever or be gutted and sold for parts. So they have this emergency revenue stream that they can break open exactly once...
  20. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Unlike this post which is made in the goodest of faith...
  21. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    I showed you two cards that were on the reserved list and have since been reprinted. If WOTC was sued over it I'm sure you can find it.
  22. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    https://c1.scryfall.com/file/scryfall-cards/large/front/a/0/a084d0fb-8db2-4873-a2f9-e6e5fecdd38c.jpg...
  23. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Gonna need the quote on that....
  24. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    They're not even that loud. I don't think I've met a single person in twenty years of playing this game that is pro reserved list.
  25. Re: Do you think Wizards will ever again print dual lands that are better than shocks

    Bosk already exists and the RL list is just a wink wink fiction.
Results 1 to 25 of 32
Page 1 of 2 1 2