Search:

Type: Posts; User: P.S.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,580

    Re: GP Kyoto discussion

    I don't want to have to use Google Chrome to Translate into English because I'll lose my Ad-Block+ and I don't want to sign-up for the website just to watch it. #Lazy :laugh:

    EDIT:...
  2. Replies
    30
    Views
    13,580

    Re: GP Kyoto discussion

    Aren't they just going to have a version on Twitch? This is disheartening. :frown:
  3. Replies
    5,230
    Views
    1,879,126

    Re: [DTB] Canadian Thresh (a.k.a. RUG Tempo, Tempo Thresh)

    This thread should have been renamed into RUG Delver forever ago. It has not been called anything other than that since Delver of Secrets was printed. It's just more confusing than it needs to be....
  4. Re: [Free Podcast] SMIP # 15: The Doomsday Scenarios & Legacy Doomsday Q&A

    As in-depth as the $5 article was, on top of the podcast & Stephen having a good showing at an SCG Open, I'm surprised more people aren't willing to give Doomsday, specifically Lab Man, a shot. It's...
  5. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    You're putting way too much faith into an outdated message forum with apathetic mods/admins. The decks listed in a certain category on this website really have no bearing on the current Metagame, as...
  6. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    No, sorry. In our group, we playtest against stock lists of all the metagame decks (well, a lot of them, I guess not all of them because there's so many in Legacy) and any decklists we come up with...
  7. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    Would you play Goblin Guide if it said "at any time, any player may pay 3 life to make you sacrifice Goblin Guide?"

    Once again, this circular argument continues. It is not a 4/3 creature for a R...
  8. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    Well, if you're on the play & you go Mountain, Guide, 2 you. Your opponent is at 18 (regardless of if the trigger gets them a land or not) and you still have a guy. If you're on the play and you go...
  9. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    I actually wouldn't play Keldon Mauraders or Hellspark Elemental (or Figure of Destiny, for that matter). I think they're all bad & pretty much go against what you're trying to do with Burn. I...
  10. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    I don't think it's far-fetched. In Legacy this card very much will be a R for a 4/3 dude. No one is paying 4-life to make you sac this guy in Legacy. Because they will instantly have you on Burn.dec...
  11. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    What you're failing to realize is that Magic is a reactive and situational game and you're giving your opponent all the decisions on if the card is relevant in a given situation or not. Unless they...
  12. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    You're missing the point. The point is THEY make the decisions. They won't give you a guy if they can't deal with a guy. They won't take four damage if they're at four life. You're just being...
  13. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    Sums that up. :wink:

    This has been mentioned before but it is being glossed over. So to put it in layman's terms, this card is never what you want it to be.

    If you want a R for a 4/3 creature,...
  14. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    It's interesting to see Wizards trying to print more "let your opponent decide" cards to see how far they can take things before players realize that they're just bad cards. Until then, it's a good...
  15. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    800,761

    Re: [DTB] Burn

    EDIT: Invalid remarks.
  16. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,546,842

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Edit: N/m
  17. Thread: [Deck] Belcher

    by P.S.
    Replies
    1,679
    Views
    458,251

    Re: [Deck] Belcher

    I don't really think there's any room left for Street Wraith in this deck. Plus, I mean, it kind of encourages keeping shitty hands. Now you're tempted to roll with a hand that has X number of...
  18. Replies
    122
    Views
    35,237

    Re: [Deck] Stompy Infect

    I like the Pendelhaven. I like Livewire Lash. I'm thinking the way to go might be to cut the Spirit Guides & Lotus Petals. I don't think their consistency for a faster start outweighs that they are...
  19. Replies
    1,471
    Views
    466,975

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I have been playing around with a Painter deck, however it is slower and plays more control-style than balls-to-the-wall speed. With Imperial Recruiter & Enlightened Tutor mainboard, I also run the...
  20. Replies
    5,962
    Views
    1,692,964

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    The 61st card is always worse than the 60th card. When going for efficiency, adding another card is just decreasing consistency.

    There was an old argument about people playing 41 cards in Limited...
  21. Thread: [Deck] Pox

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,250
    Views
    702,842

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    If I'm being 100% completely honest, I feel like this thread has hit a wall and will only stunt my Pox progression if I continue to actively partake in it.

    I am not going to make any hyperbolic...
  22. Thread: [Deck] Pox

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,250
    Views
    702,842

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    So now you've resorted to trolling the Magic community as a whole and trying to downplay competitive play because you got called out on playing bad cards? Which you're still trying to champion,...
  23. Thread: [Deck] Pox

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,250
    Views
    702,842

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I would never play Bump in the Night. That card is just...so bad.

    http://i.imgur.com/HkanQ.jpg

    What about this card is appealing at all? If you want to seem original and "go against the grain"...
  24. Thread: [Deck] Pox

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,250
    Views
    702,842

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    I concur. Right now I run three copies of both Pox and Lilliana. I wanted more Pox and less Lilliana. Pox wins games. That's why the deck is called Pox!
  25. Thread: [Deck] Pox

    by P.S.
    Replies
    2,250
    Views
    702,842

    Re: [Deck] Pox

    Pretty much any deck that plays Brainstorm is what it seems like so far. Maybe not the Delver deck. Also, a lot of the cards you're talking about costing me too much, remember that I play both Mox...
Results 1 to 25 of 120
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4