I don't want to have to use Google Chrome to Translate into English because I'll lose my Ad-Block+ and I don't want to sign-up for the website just to watch it. #Lazy :laugh:
EDIT:...
Type: Posts; User: P.S.
I don't want to have to use Google Chrome to Translate into English because I'll lose my Ad-Block+ and I don't want to sign-up for the website just to watch it. #Lazy :laugh:
EDIT:...
Aren't they just going to have a version on Twitch? This is disheartening. :frown:
This thread should have been renamed into RUG Delver forever ago. It has not been called anything other than that since Delver of Secrets was printed. It's just more confusing than it needs to be....
As in-depth as the $5 article was, on top of the podcast & Stephen having a good showing at an SCG Open, I'm surprised more people aren't willing to give Doomsday, specifically Lab Man, a shot. It's...
You're putting way too much faith into an outdated message forum with apathetic mods/admins. The decks listed in a certain category on this website really have no bearing on the current Metagame, as...
No, sorry. In our group, we playtest against stock lists of all the metagame decks (well, a lot of them, I guess not all of them because there's so many in Legacy) and any decklists we come up with...
Would you play Goblin Guide if it said "at any time, any player may pay 3 life to make you sacrifice Goblin Guide?"
Once again, this circular argument continues. It is not a 4/3 creature for a R...
Well, if you're on the play & you go Mountain, Guide, 2 you. Your opponent is at 18 (regardless of if the trigger gets them a land or not) and you still have a guy. If you're on the play and you go...
I actually wouldn't play Keldon Mauraders or Hellspark Elemental (or Figure of Destiny, for that matter). I think they're all bad & pretty much go against what you're trying to do with Burn. I...
I don't think it's far-fetched. In Legacy this card very much will be a R for a 4/3 dude. No one is paying 4-life to make you sac this guy in Legacy. Because they will instantly have you on Burn.dec...
What you're failing to realize is that Magic is a reactive and situational game and you're giving your opponent all the decisions on if the card is relevant in a given situation or not. Unless they...
You're missing the point. The point is THEY make the decisions. They won't give you a guy if they can't deal with a guy. They won't take four damage if they're at four life. You're just being...
Sums that up. :wink:
This has been mentioned before but it is being glossed over. So to put it in layman's terms, this card is never what you want it to be.
If you want a R for a 4/3 creature,...
It's interesting to see Wizards trying to print more "let your opponent decide" cards to see how far they can take things before players realize that they're just bad cards. Until then, it's a good...
EDIT: Invalid remarks.
Edit: N/m
I don't really think there's any room left for Street Wraith in this deck. Plus, I mean, it kind of encourages keeping shitty hands. Now you're tempted to roll with a hand that has X number of...
I like the Pendelhaven. I like Livewire Lash. I'm thinking the way to go might be to cut the Spirit Guides & Lotus Petals. I don't think their consistency for a faster start outweighs that they are...
I have been playing around with a Painter deck, however it is slower and plays more control-style than balls-to-the-wall speed. With Imperial Recruiter & Enlightened Tutor mainboard, I also run the...
The 61st card is always worse than the 60th card. When going for efficiency, adding another card is just decreasing consistency.
There was an old argument about people playing 41 cards in Limited...
If I'm being 100% completely honest, I feel like this thread has hit a wall and will only stunt my Pox progression if I continue to actively partake in it.
I am not going to make any hyperbolic...
So now you've resorted to trolling the Magic community as a whole and trying to downplay competitive play because you got called out on playing bad cards? Which you're still trying to champion,...
I would never play Bump in the Night. That card is just...so bad.
http://i.imgur.com/HkanQ.jpg
What about this card is appealing at all? If you want to seem original and "go against the grain"...
I concur. Right now I run three copies of both Pox and Lilliana. I wanted more Pox and less Lilliana. Pox wins games. That's why the deck is called Pox!
Pretty much any deck that plays Brainstorm is what it seems like so far. Maybe not the Delver deck. Also, a lot of the cards you're talking about costing me too much, remember that I play both Mox...