Stupid question about this card:
http://ww2.wizards.com/Gatherer/Card....aspx?&id=2554
Mana cost was changed in Oracle. There's no mention of it in the rulings section, which seems odd. Anyone know about this? In general I would follow the Oracle text.
The Oracle is always de jure correct, though the Head Judge can always deviate in unexpected circumstances (and face the consequences afterwards).
What you are looking at though is a misprinted Dire Wolves. If you look at other images or a real one (chances of you having a misprinted one are slim), it does indeed cost 2G.
Last edited by cdr; 01-31-2009 at 08:54 PM.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
They do. I don't know why they do, but they do.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)