To be sure I wasn't suggesting that, or any other name for this particular deck. Only pointing out that, even if this deck uses new and innovative combinations of cards, it is still a chalice+mox deck at its core. 4 Chalice + 4 Mox is where this type of decklist always start, because it defines what you can have in the deck besides those 8. That is why I don't think it makes sense to name the deck after a sub-theme, like "punish blue" (the deck does so much more than that), or the Punishing Fire engine, or Loam for that matter.
I kind of like "Next Level Aggro Loam" or something along those lines. It's certainly not quite the traditional aggro loam, but it looks pretty derivative of the deck, just updated given new cards and a new metagame. A name like that I think would give a decent idea of what the deck is (somewhat related to Aggro Loam), yet indicates that it's changed in some significant way.
I like:
Anything But Blue
The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
1. Discuss the unbanning ofLand TaxEarthcraft.
2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
4. Stifle Standstill.
5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).
I think the biggest thing is the deep seeded emotional understanding that the right play is the right play regardless of outcomes. The ability to make a decision 5 straight times, lose 5 times because of it, and still make it the 6th time if it's the right play. - Jon Finkel
"Notions of chance and fate are the preoccupation of men engaged in rash undertakings."
Bad Guy
Bg
My inclination would be to call it:
I hate U.dec
Just looks like a much more controlling aggro loam, close to what it looked like when the loam/assault deck first took off.
Team FireBrothers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)