Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 125

Thread: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

  1. #41
    !
    jrsthethird's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts

    1,654

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Deuce View Post
    I've complained about card prices for years, and I won't argue that it's not tough to sink hundreds of dollars into the land-base for a deck that's otherwise pretty similar to its incarnation in other formats. But if anything is killing Legacy, it's the stupidity of people who don't seem to notice that Tarmogoyf is more expensive than most of the dual lands, not the price of said dual lands or the fact that they're not coming back.
    Modern prices are pretty huge too. It's really the Shocks vs. Duals that keeps the price significantly below Legacy, when you look at averages. Sure, we have $150+ fringe cards like Recruiter, Cradle, Chains, Tabernacle, Eureka, etc. (I use the word fringe because you can play the format without investing in those cards, even if the card is only included in a single DTB), but most of the staple non-land cards are cheaper than Goyfs. If you are a player with a sizable Modern collection, you can trade your Goyfs and Lilianas for FOWs and Wastelands (and more) and have an entire Delver deck without the 6 dual lands necessary. Might have to pick up some C/U cards like Daze but that's negligible (and compensated by the value gained in trading down Goyfs/Lilis).

    But a counterpoint to your argument is that Legacy has a defined cap on the number of possible players due to the Reserved List. It makes complete sense that Wizards and SCG are pulling back support, since supporting Legacy at the same level that they support Modern or Standard is completely impossible without removing the Reserved List (or at least making an exception for dual lands). I don't know the exact numbers on print runs of ABU/Revised, but the number of dual lands in existence is finite. There is nothing killing Legacy per se, but the Reserved List effectively caps its growth.

  2. #42
    Do you have a moment to talk about Primeval Titan?

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Canada, eh
    Posts

    704

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by jrsthethird View Post
    Modern prices are pretty huge too. It's really the Shocks vs. Duals that keeps the price significantly below Legacy, when you look at averages.
    That is only because WoTC reprinted the shocklands en masse. Remember when shocklands were >$40 each and climbing? Remember when Thoughtseize was >$70 each and climbing?

    This is the lesson they learned with Chronicles. Now, years later, the shock land prices are still in the dumps because countless million shocklands were printed. It's just now they don't give a fuck about Modern collectors.

  3. #43

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by barcode View Post

    ....

    It's just now they don't give a fuck about Modern collectors.
    And why should they?

  4. #44
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    They shouldn't. Personally, I want to see a wide reprinting of all the Modern staples. I don't feel a staple in a format designed to get around the reserved list should cost 200 dollars.

    I would also like them to bite the bullet and admit that Modern is now above the power level they wished for the format and print direct to Modern cards. The idea that you can move from Standard straight into Modern is a joke and that old excuse holds no water in my opinion.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

  5. #45
    !
    jrsthethird's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2010
    Location

    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts

    1,654

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    They could introduce them into the Modern format with the next Modern Masters.

    The problem with letting sets like Commander and Conspiracy be Modern-legal is that you can't distinguish original cards made for the set with non-Modern reprints. If Commander and Conspiracy were made Modern legal, we'd get Brainstorm in Modern. And you think Flusterstorm is expensive now?

  6. #46
    Do you have a moment to talk about Primeval Titan?

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Canada, eh
    Posts

    704

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Blastoderm View Post
    And why should they?
    Magic is a collectible card game. Why should people collect the cards or buy packs if there is no security in their secondary value?

  7. #47
    Hamburglar Hlelpler
    TsumiBand's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Nebraska
    Posts

    2,774

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by barcode View Post
    Magic is a collectible card game. Why should people collect the cards or buy packs if there is no security in their secondary value?
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Creature type - 'Fuck you mooooooom'
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    EDIT: Tsumi, you are silly.

  8. #48
    Do you have a moment to talk about Primeval Titan?

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Canada, eh
    Posts

    704

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    You should salty. Are you salty?

  9. #49
    Ooh... Shiny!

    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Raincouver
    Posts

    694

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    There seems to be a clear divide in opinion between people who paid $20 for Seas and people who paid $200 for Seas.

  10. #50
    Hamburglar Hlelpler
    TsumiBand's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2005
    Location

    Nebraska
    Posts

    2,774

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by barcode View Post
    You should salty. Are you salty?
    I'm not salty but I find fault in the argument and it occurs to me that *demanding* a return on this alleged "investment" is a weirdly vicious kind of entitlement. It's so beyond absurd that honestly it surprises me that it was ever dignified with an actual response. For my part I couldn't care less if I ever even own so much as a Taiga. Your salt detector went off because I can't believe anyone would say "I deserve security on my kid's game purchase" and actually mean it. Such utter horse ass.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Creature type - 'Fuck you mooooooom'
    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    EDIT: Tsumi, you are silly.

  11. #51
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    234

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.C View Post
    There seems to be a clear divide in opinion between people who paid $20 for Seas and people who paid $200 for Seas.
    I paid around $100-150 for my blue duals and I really wish they would starting to print all legacy staples massively. I don't give a crap about the value of my cardboard. I'm trying to play legacy, not swim in a cardboard-filled vault. What I do care about is if all my friends join me to legacy tournaments because now they are willing as well to invest a much more reasonable price for their decks instead of the rediculous prices we have now.

    The divide is probably more clear between people who enjoy and play the format and those who just have $$ in as eyes. If money is that important, get a proper job.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Non games are not only a common sight in Legacy, they are every decks plan. [...] Playing a deck like DnT and then complaining about "Non games" is hypocritical, because non games are your plan, you just disapprove of the way someone else is trying to achieve that same goal.

  12. #52
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Cards are expensive, I agree. Shelling out 2k is not chump change for most.

    I'm in support of reprinting cards not on the reserve list, and bringing those prices down into affordability. Realistically, the duals and a few other niche cards will be, and should be, the most expensive. Forces don't need to be infinite, nor do Fetches, Wastes, Goyfs, etc.

    I paid $20 for duals, and I've paid $2000 for duals. Price will be a barrier to some, even at $50 duals. If you want it, you'll pay, but it's certainly a freakin' fun format and I wouldn't be opposed to having more people in it.

  13. #53

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    I wish to sign up for your newsletter, vote you for president and generally wave the 'TsumiBand' banner!

    I thought I was alone in thinking this way. It's like insisting that Games Workshop don't create any more Space Marines because the plastic ones I bought ages ago should have their value protected and be a secure vehicle for financial investment. And yes I've paid a lot of money (for me) for out of print cardboard in the past and I can honesty say, hand on heart, that if it dropped 90% in value tonight I wouldn't care, especially if the result of that was more people able to play Legacy so that I could use that cardboard more.

  14. #54
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts

    684

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    Cards are expensive, I agree. Shelling out 2k is not chump change for most.

    I'm in support of reprinting cards not on the reserve list, and bringing those prices down into affordability. Realistically, the duals and a few other niche cards will be, and should be, the most expensive. Forces don't need to be infinite, nor do Fetches, Wastes, Goyfs, etc.

    I paid $20 for duals, and I've paid $2000 for duals. Price will be a barrier to some, even at $50 duals. If you want it, you'll pay, but it's certainly a freakin' fun format and I wouldn't be opposed to having more people in it.
    Matt, while I wouldn't be against a non-reserved list reprint of say, force, waste, karakas, port etc in principle, I'd be worried about the ramifications of such a move. I mean, let's say that happens. Legacy get's more popular because whooop, you can crack force of will in boosterpacks and the price of force drops to like half of what it is. Well then more players want in to the format. However, the duals (and a few other cards like cradle, LED etc) now get even more expensive because the more non-reserved list staples get reprinted and drop in price, the more people will be looking at getting into the format, the more expensive the reserved list staples are bound to get. What will happen then? Can the format handle $5-700$ blue 3rd edition duals? Will a proper "developed/non-developed world" evolve where a large portion of players can only play with shocks and not duals. I'd imagine that's (among other things) what's keeping WotC from doing a "Legacy Masters" type release.

  15. #55
    Bald. Bearded. Moderator.
    Mr. Safety's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2010
    Location

    Hell in a Nutshell
    Posts

    5,246

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    You're the best, this post fucking rocks.

    Edit: on a seriois note, I believe all playable cards in formats should be reasonably available to all players. Vintage is still a format but the rarity and value of the cards only in that format should keep collectors happy (p9, etc.) Let the rest of us play some cards.
    Brainstorm Realist

    I close my eyes and sink within myself, relive the gift of precious memories, in need of a fix called innocence. - Chuck Shuldiner

  16. #56
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    The woods again
    Posts

    1,096

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    They fucking shouldn't. It's a goddamned game made of card stock. A flock of hatfuckers decided that collectible was synonymous with valuable and locked in one of the most abhorrent blights on the entire game of Magic. If you want secure investments get a motherfucking IRA, this argument fails under the weight of its absurdity - that one would expect security in the purchase of game pieces for kids 13 and older. Christ on a quiz show.
    If I pay hundreds of dollars for tangible objects that don't wear out quickly and can be resold (unlike, say, lawnmower blades), I certainly would hope those items wouldn't plummet in value. And demand sets the prices of the cards; only insofar as they can manipulate the demand do collectors have any impact. There's nothing absurd about any of that.

    You're right, though: an investment is an investment; a game is a game. When a game becomes an investment, that's not good for the game or the investors. Er, players. Plainvestors. Or something. Speculating on cards isn't good, either.

    But I don't see anything irrational or entitled about people's hoping their stuff doesn't become valueless. Especially when the people who create the global supply absolutely can figure out whether they'll impact said objects' value by producing or not producing items.
    Last edited by Ronald Deuce; 11-27-2015 at 11:41 PM.

  17. #57

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Two thoughts:
    1.
    Could they get away with timeshifting the duals at rare or mythic in another timespiral block? So you have a shot of opening a rare and a dual, but the chances are slim?

    a.
    Create a third un-set called "unreserved". Only reprint reserved list cards, but give them stupid names. Reprint the duals but call them things like "swampy island" and "mountainous plains", etc. give them a dash of that ol' digital art everyone seems to be so fond of, and politely ask Sheldon and the RC to make them legal in EDH. It would reduce some of the demand the from EDH crowd for the cards, Wizards makes a buttload of money off casuals, and grows the playerbase for a cashcow format. I can see the packaging now: Juzam Djinn wearing a fez and holding a bespectacled collector between two dingy fingernails. Tagline: "Unreserved: Unapologetic, Unleashed and Uncalled For."
    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    It's like arguing your way out of a speeding ticket by saying "it's not like I'm wearing oven mitts, officer."
    Twenty Kavus and a Dream is NOT a Legacy deck.

  18. #58
    Do you have a moment to talk about Primeval Titan?

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Location

    Canada, eh
    Posts

    704

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Quote Originally Posted by kirkusjones View Post
    Two thoughts:
    1.
    Could they get away with timeshifting the duals at rare or mythic in another timespiral block? So you have a shot of opening a rare and a dual, but the chances are slim?

    a.
    Create a third un-set called "unreserved". Only reprint reserved list cards, but give them stupid names. Reprint the duals but call them things like "swampy island" and "mountainous plains", etc. give them a dash of that ol' digital art everyone seems to be so fond of, and politely ask Sheldon and the RC to make them legal in EDH. It would reduce some of the demand the from EDH crowd for the cards, Wizards makes a buttload of money off casuals, and grows the playerbase for a cashcow format. I can see the packaging now: Juzam Djinn wearing a fez and holding a bespectacled collector between two dingy fingernails. Tagline: "Unreserved: Unapologetic, Unleashed and Uncalled For."
    When they made the reserved list they said they wouldn't make functional reprints. So they can't make 1 mana blue instant that says "target player draws 3 cards" even if they call it "Brain Growth" or whatever.

    A great example of functional reprints are Lightning Strike and Searing Spear. However Chain Lightning and Lava Spike are different because Lava Spike can't target creatures and can't be bounced back.

    So "Swampy Island" wouldn't work because it would still be a land with types Swamp and Island with no other drawback (like the shocklands are a drawback).

    ninja edit: However: they could probably get away with, U, Instant, You draw 3 cards. Or, U, Sorcery, You draw 3 cards. The problem is that now Vintage has 2 Ancestral Recall cards.
    Last edited by barcode; 11-28-2015 at 08:10 AM.

  19. #59

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Lol so a Recall that cant be misdirected... I like it xD
    Why not just make better cards? U draw 4? Island Mountain scry 1?
    “Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.

  20. #60
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: [Article] No Reserved List Legacy

    Playing Modern today with a Legacy event happening tomorrow, I started asking around who was coming to Legacy. Shock and horror, someone mentions this article. "I read a really good article about Legacy" kind of made me a touch pissed. The issue was, here is someone that has never played Legacy who thinks this idea is the best thing ever, because regardless of the impacts on the format, then he could play it.

    Now trying to explain that it's not all sunshine and rainbow's turned out to be hard. His argument being who could afford to play Legacy anyway and it was not until I got around to explaining that Legacy as it is right now still fires an event every week that he shut up.

    We are a group who understand what this would do, but to the outsiders this idea seems great. This leads me to think this is not a true suggestion to help Legacy, but a way to get views for a site that has little market share in the shadow of SCG and Channelfireball. Because it has found a home in the minds of some but these happen to be the some that do not understand what losing Duals mean. I guess if they go on posting Modern and Standard content and get eyes on it well mission accomplished.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)