So game 1 I did see mentor, so I didn’t feel that cutting swords entirely was the right call. I never got to see EtA, he very well could be running it though. Verdict was largely an effort to contain an out of control mentor. I’ve seen the deck burn through 2-3 cantrips in a turn. STP doesn’t address this, and is counterable vs a deck full of counters. I could very well be wrong, but I like verdict because it’s an unconditional middle finger to mentor and his students.
I agree with your Liliana call. I didn’t put her in because I didn’t see what she could kill. Her just being a board presence that must be dealt with is a reasonable assessment. I’ll have to revisit my sideboard choices here.
IMO Tasigur gets cut because he’s pretty bad against a deck with 4x STP. Tasigur is in there to give me a diversity of threats, in this case miracles just has the perfect answer.
-1 Tasigur
-3 Collective Brutality
-2 Swords to Plowshares
+1 FoW(Jace/Search are must stop cards)
+1 Disenchant
+1 Supreme Verdict
+2 Surgical Extraction
+1 Liliana
I think you’re pretty much spot on with this assessment. Verdict probably doesn’t address the underlying problems in this matchup. My knee jerk reaction to remove pierce was probably just due to the massive amount of mana this deck produces in the first place. I’ll try this next time
-1 Supreme Verdict
-1 Unearth
-1 Sorin, Lord of Innistrad
-3 Collective Brutality
+1 Force of Will
+1 Disenchant
+1 Supreme Verdict
+1 Engineered Explosives
+2 Back to Basics
Hmm I guess we’re seeing two different versions of pox. The pox deck I’m encountering doesn’t run bloodghasts, or at least I haven’t seen them over the 3-4 matchups I’ve played against him. His primary threats are mishra’s factory and I think 2 tombstalkers. Given this threat suite I feel like I’m sideboard appropriately.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)