Quote Originally Posted by H View Post
So what you are saying is that the basis of your case is that they the announced they'd make more game pieces and then did? What are your damages in this case?

No, you'd have to make the case that they somehow promised to make certain specific game pieces and then didn't. Except they never did that. Or, if they did, no one ever heard it.

They did, on the other hand, expressly state they would not make certain specific game pieces. And they don't (anymore) post-closing the Foil "loophole." That's the case that could be made with some likely weight of law. Just because no one took action based on Phyrexian Dreadnaughts, doesn't mean it couldn't have been done.

Then again, as I said, I am not a lawyer, so do your best Johnnie Cochran and go get 'em if you have the superior understanding and grasp of the facts of the matter.
As purple blood said you need four elements:
1 a promise: wizards announces a set
2 an expectation: wizards keeps releasing sets, so I expect them to release the announced set
3 an action: to release the announced set
4 an injustice: any plans I made to use the set, I have to cancel which can only be done with the now non-existent set
Congrats, you've now established the legal case that wizards can never cancel a set. Now if you say "wait a minute! That's nuts" then congrats! You're one step closer to understanding that the legal case for keeping the reserve list is only as strong as the lawyers paychecks